[公共卫生研究生课程中的定性研究培训:巴西概况]。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Cadernos de saude publica Pub Date : 2024-09-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0102-311XPT116723
Dais Gonçalves Rocha, Nilza Rogéria Andrade Nunes, Giannina do Espírito-Santo, Maria Lúcia Magalhães Bosi
{"title":"[公共卫生研究生课程中的定性研究培训:巴西概况]。","authors":"Dais Gonçalves Rocha, Nilza Rogéria Andrade Nunes, Giannina do Espírito-Santo, Maria Lúcia Magalhães Bosi","doi":"10.1590/0102-311XPT116723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article analyzes the evidence of qualitative research training in graduate programs in Public Health accredited by Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) in Brazil in 2021. To map out the disciplines, the Sucupira Platform was accessed to locate the graduate programs in Public Health, and the institutional portals were searched. A total of 98 courses were identified. Using reflective thematic analysis, it was possible to group the data production and the characterization of the courses into the following macro categories of analysis: (a) workload and type of course offered (mandatory or optional); (b) teaching-learning objectives; (c) content (with emphasis on the investigation of scientific paradigms or different theoretical-methodological approaches to qualitative research); (d) teaching-learning methodologies. The results show that only 40.4% of the courses are mandatory and the predominant teaching-learning objectives focus on instrumentalization and enabling graduate students to create research projects. In total, 59.3% of the courses did not inform the type of teaching-learning methodology. There is a gap in the use of digital technologies and spaces and a predominance of the text-based approach. Furthermore, the epistemological-theoretical training is fragile. The learning of the Positivist paradigm predominates over the interpretive paradigm of critical theories/traditions. The article concludes by systematizing elements for a training itinerary with increasing degrees of complexity, intentionally structured and developed in an institutional environment that fosters decoloniality and epistemic reparation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9398,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de saude publica","volume":"40 8","pages":"e00116723"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11405022/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Qualitative research training in graduate programs in Public Health: an overview in Brazil].\",\"authors\":\"Dais Gonçalves Rocha, Nilza Rogéria Andrade Nunes, Giannina do Espírito-Santo, Maria Lúcia Magalhães Bosi\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0102-311XPT116723\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article analyzes the evidence of qualitative research training in graduate programs in Public Health accredited by Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) in Brazil in 2021. To map out the disciplines, the Sucupira Platform was accessed to locate the graduate programs in Public Health, and the institutional portals were searched. A total of 98 courses were identified. Using reflective thematic analysis, it was possible to group the data production and the characterization of the courses into the following macro categories of analysis: (a) workload and type of course offered (mandatory or optional); (b) teaching-learning objectives; (c) content (with emphasis on the investigation of scientific paradigms or different theoretical-methodological approaches to qualitative research); (d) teaching-learning methodologies. The results show that only 40.4% of the courses are mandatory and the predominant teaching-learning objectives focus on instrumentalization and enabling graduate students to create research projects. In total, 59.3% of the courses did not inform the type of teaching-learning methodology. There is a gap in the use of digital technologies and spaces and a predominance of the text-based approach. Furthermore, the epistemological-theoretical training is fragile. The learning of the Positivist paradigm predominates over the interpretive paradigm of critical theories/traditions. The article concludes by systematizing elements for a training itinerary with increasing degrees of complexity, intentionally structured and developed in an institutional environment that fosters decoloniality and epistemic reparation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cadernos de saude publica\",\"volume\":\"40 8\",\"pages\":\"e00116723\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11405022/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cadernos de saude publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XPT116723\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XPT116723","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了2021年巴西高等教育人事改进协调局(CAPES)认证的公共卫生研究生项目中定性研究培训的证据。为绘制学科地图,我们访问了 Sucupira 平台以查找公共卫生研究生课程,并搜索了各院校的门户网站。共确定了 98 门课程。通过反思性专题分析,可以将数据生成和课程特征归纳为以下宏观分析类别:(a) 工作量和课程类型(必修或选修);(b) 教学目标;(c) 内容(重点是科学范式调查或定性研究的不同理论方法);(d) 教学方法。结果表明,只有 40.4% 的课程是必修课,主要的教学目标侧重于工具化和使研究生能够创建研究项目。总共有 59.3% 的课程没有说明教学方法的类型。在数字技术和空间的使用方面存在差距,以文本为基础的方法占主导地位。此外,认识论-理论培训也很脆弱。实证主义范式的学习比批判理论/传统的解释性范式占主导地位。文章最后系统阐述了在促进非殖民化和认识论补偿的体制环境中有意构建和发展的、复杂程度不断提高的培训课程的要素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Qualitative research training in graduate programs in Public Health: an overview in Brazil].

This article analyzes the evidence of qualitative research training in graduate programs in Public Health accredited by Brazilian Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) in Brazil in 2021. To map out the disciplines, the Sucupira Platform was accessed to locate the graduate programs in Public Health, and the institutional portals were searched. A total of 98 courses were identified. Using reflective thematic analysis, it was possible to group the data production and the characterization of the courses into the following macro categories of analysis: (a) workload and type of course offered (mandatory or optional); (b) teaching-learning objectives; (c) content (with emphasis on the investigation of scientific paradigms or different theoretical-methodological approaches to qualitative research); (d) teaching-learning methodologies. The results show that only 40.4% of the courses are mandatory and the predominant teaching-learning objectives focus on instrumentalization and enabling graduate students to create research projects. In total, 59.3% of the courses did not inform the type of teaching-learning methodology. There is a gap in the use of digital technologies and spaces and a predominance of the text-based approach. Furthermore, the epistemological-theoretical training is fragile. The learning of the Positivist paradigm predominates over the interpretive paradigm of critical theories/traditions. The article concludes by systematizing elements for a training itinerary with increasing degrees of complexity, intentionally structured and developed in an institutional environment that fosters decoloniality and epistemic reparation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cadernos de saude publica
Cadernos de saude publica 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
356
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Cadernos de Saúde Pública/Reports in Public Health (CSP) is a monthly journal published by the Sergio Arouca National School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/FIOCRUZ). The journal is devoted to the publication of scientific articles focusing on the production of knowledge in Public Health. CSP also aims to foster critical reflection and debate on current themes related to public policies and factors that impact populations'' living conditions and health care. All articles submitted to CSP are judiciously evaluated by the Editorial Board, composed of the Editors-in-Chief and Associate Editors, respecting the diversity of approaches, objects, and methods of the different disciplines characterizing the field of Public Health. Originality, relevance, and methodological rigor are the principal characteristics considered in the editorial evaluation. The article evaluation system practiced by CSP consists of two stages.
期刊最新文献
[Descriptive study of events allegedly attributable to mpox vaccination in Brazil in 2023]. [Impact of telediagnostics on hospitalizations due to cardiovascular diseases: an approach in municipalities of Bahia State, Brazil]. [Intersectoral actions and the recognition of a source of primary care for Brazilian adolescents]. [Organizational roles, work-family conflict, job satisfaction, and mental health of teachers regarding affective organizational commitment]. [The symbolic value of drug use for ill-housed people: drug that kills and nourishes].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1