Surgical strategy and long-term outcomes of dissected carotid artery with false lumen thrombus in acute type A aortic dissection.

Background: Optimal management of involved common carotid artery (CCA) with false-lumen thrombus remains unclear in aortic dissection patients. We aim to investigate outcomes and compare different surgical strategies.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study and the institutional database of acute type A aortic dissection was reviewed. The patients with CCA involvement and extended false-lumen thrombus were enrolled and grouped according to the management of CCA: extra-thoracic carotid artery replacement (CAR) and reconstruction in situ (RIS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the effect of management on neurological outcomes. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and log-rank test was used to compare the difference on survival rate.

Results: From March 2011 to December 2019, 68 patients were enrolled (24 in the CAR group and 44 in the RIS group). The overall operative mortality was 7.4% (5 patients) and 21 patients had the incidence of postoperative neurological deficit was (30.9%). The rates of main postoperative complications were similar between the two groups. Twenty-five (56.8%) patients in the RIS group had residual false-lumen thrombus at discharge. In multivariate analysis, CAR was the only independent protective factor of postoperative neurological deficit [odds ratio (OR) =0.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.0-0.61, P=0.02] and age was the only risk factor (OR =1.34, 95% CI: 1.11-1.62, P=0.002). The median follow-up time was 40 (interquartile range, 24-69) months and some of the patients received imaging follow-up. The overall survival rates at 5 and 10 years were 95.8%, and 95.8% in the CAR group and 84.1%, and 76.4% in the RIS group, with no significant difference (P=0.22). No cerebrovascular accident and reintervention occurred and 20 (90.9%) patients with residual false-lumen thrombus had reabsorption of thrombus during the follow-up period.

Conclusions: CAR was a thorough technique and could protect patients from postoperative neurological deficit than RIS. Patients in either group could have a satisfying long-term prognosis after surviving from perioperative period. Most patients had reabsorption of residual false-lumen thrombus after anticoagulant therapy.