Mohd Nehal, Jahanarah Khatoon, Salman Akhtar, Mohd Kalim Ahmad Khan
{"title":"抑制 EphA2 的计算见解:整合基于结构的虚拟筛选、对接和分子动力学模拟以发现小分子。","authors":"Mohd Nehal, Jahanarah Khatoon, Salman Akhtar, Mohd Kalim Ahmad Khan","doi":"10.14715/cmb/2024.70.8.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Elevated expression and dysfunction of ephrin type A receptor-2 (EphA2) have been implicated in the initiation and progression of cancer, metastasis, and unfavorable clinical outcomes. A promising strategy to counteract this dysregulation involves the development of small-molecule inhibitors that target EphA2. Our study focuses on this objective. To initiate Structure-Based Virtual Screening (SBVS), we leveraged an advanced online platform, the Mcule database, which houses an extensive collection of millions of chemical compounds. Using drug similarity filters, we efficiently identified ten thousand potential hits. By further refining the selection through toxicity profiling, we prudently narrowed down the candidates to a more manageable set of 100 molecules. Using the Mcule Single Click, DockThor, and SwissDock tools, we conducted multi-scoring docking assessments of thirty-seven compounds that satisfied the ADME standards. A comprehensive evaluation of Gibbs binding free energy terms, as derived from these docking tools, facilitated the identification of top-ranking docking hits. Remarkably, among the known inhibitors, dasatinib displayed the most robust binding to EphA2 with an average ΔG of -9.0 kcal/mol. Intriguingly, alternatives have emerged in recent years. Notably, small molecules such as Mcule-1579910267 (ΔG: -9.3 kcal/mol), Mcule-1893218381 (ΔG: -9.2 kcal/mol), Mcule-3981378344 (ΔG: -9.3 kcal/mol), and Mcule-8617639093 (ΔG: -9.1 kcal/mol) exhibited a notably strong binding affinity to EphA2, rivaling dasatinib. Subsequently, the four leading ligands along with dasatinib were selected for the MD simulations. Our rigorous analyses during the MD simulation phase encompassing RMSD, RMSF, SASA, ΔGsolv, and Rg underscored the favorable stability of Mcule-8617639093. This compelling evidence ultimately signifies the potential for selective EphA2 inhibition.</p>","PeriodicalId":9802,"journal":{"name":"Cellular and molecular biology","volume":"70 8","pages":"16-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computational insights into inhibiting EphA2: Integrating structure-based virtual screening, docking, and molecular dynamics simulations for small molecule discovery.\",\"authors\":\"Mohd Nehal, Jahanarah Khatoon, Salman Akhtar, Mohd Kalim Ahmad Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.14715/cmb/2024.70.8.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Elevated expression and dysfunction of ephrin type A receptor-2 (EphA2) have been implicated in the initiation and progression of cancer, metastasis, and unfavorable clinical outcomes. A promising strategy to counteract this dysregulation involves the development of small-molecule inhibitors that target EphA2. Our study focuses on this objective. To initiate Structure-Based Virtual Screening (SBVS), we leveraged an advanced online platform, the Mcule database, which houses an extensive collection of millions of chemical compounds. Using drug similarity filters, we efficiently identified ten thousand potential hits. By further refining the selection through toxicity profiling, we prudently narrowed down the candidates to a more manageable set of 100 molecules. Using the Mcule Single Click, DockThor, and SwissDock tools, we conducted multi-scoring docking assessments of thirty-seven compounds that satisfied the ADME standards. A comprehensive evaluation of Gibbs binding free energy terms, as derived from these docking tools, facilitated the identification of top-ranking docking hits. Remarkably, among the known inhibitors, dasatinib displayed the most robust binding to EphA2 with an average ΔG of -9.0 kcal/mol. Intriguingly, alternatives have emerged in recent years. Notably, small molecules such as Mcule-1579910267 (ΔG: -9.3 kcal/mol), Mcule-1893218381 (ΔG: -9.2 kcal/mol), Mcule-3981378344 (ΔG: -9.3 kcal/mol), and Mcule-8617639093 (ΔG: -9.1 kcal/mol) exhibited a notably strong binding affinity to EphA2, rivaling dasatinib. Subsequently, the four leading ligands along with dasatinib were selected for the MD simulations. Our rigorous analyses during the MD simulation phase encompassing RMSD, RMSF, SASA, ΔGsolv, and Rg underscored the favorable stability of Mcule-8617639093. This compelling evidence ultimately signifies the potential for selective EphA2 inhibition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cellular and molecular biology\",\"volume\":\"70 8\",\"pages\":\"16-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cellular and molecular biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2024.70.8.3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cellular and molecular biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14715/cmb/2024.70.8.3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Computational insights into inhibiting EphA2: Integrating structure-based virtual screening, docking, and molecular dynamics simulations for small molecule discovery.
Elevated expression and dysfunction of ephrin type A receptor-2 (EphA2) have been implicated in the initiation and progression of cancer, metastasis, and unfavorable clinical outcomes. A promising strategy to counteract this dysregulation involves the development of small-molecule inhibitors that target EphA2. Our study focuses on this objective. To initiate Structure-Based Virtual Screening (SBVS), we leveraged an advanced online platform, the Mcule database, which houses an extensive collection of millions of chemical compounds. Using drug similarity filters, we efficiently identified ten thousand potential hits. By further refining the selection through toxicity profiling, we prudently narrowed down the candidates to a more manageable set of 100 molecules. Using the Mcule Single Click, DockThor, and SwissDock tools, we conducted multi-scoring docking assessments of thirty-seven compounds that satisfied the ADME standards. A comprehensive evaluation of Gibbs binding free energy terms, as derived from these docking tools, facilitated the identification of top-ranking docking hits. Remarkably, among the known inhibitors, dasatinib displayed the most robust binding to EphA2 with an average ΔG of -9.0 kcal/mol. Intriguingly, alternatives have emerged in recent years. Notably, small molecules such as Mcule-1579910267 (ΔG: -9.3 kcal/mol), Mcule-1893218381 (ΔG: -9.2 kcal/mol), Mcule-3981378344 (ΔG: -9.3 kcal/mol), and Mcule-8617639093 (ΔG: -9.1 kcal/mol) exhibited a notably strong binding affinity to EphA2, rivaling dasatinib. Subsequently, the four leading ligands along with dasatinib were selected for the MD simulations. Our rigorous analyses during the MD simulation phase encompassing RMSD, RMSF, SASA, ΔGsolv, and Rg underscored the favorable stability of Mcule-8617639093. This compelling evidence ultimately signifies the potential for selective EphA2 inhibition.
期刊介绍:
Cellular and Molecular Biology publishes original articles, reviews, short communications, methods, meta-analysis notes, letters to editor and comments in the interdisciplinary science of Cellular and Molecular Biology linking and integrating molecular biology, biophysics, biochemistry, enzymology, physiology and biotechnology in a dynamic cell and tissue biology environment, applied to human, animals, plants tissues as well to microbial and viral cells. The journal Cellular and Molecular Biology is therefore open to intense interdisciplinary exchanges in medical, dental, veterinary, pharmacological, botanical and biological researches for the demonstration of these multiple links.