使用聚类分析的肉样瘤病临床表型:一项基于西班牙人群的队列研究。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY Clinical and experimental rheumatology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-09 DOI:10.55563/clinexprheumatol/q2idtc
Raúl Fernández-Ramón, Jorge Javier Gaitán-Valdizán, José Luis Martín-Varillas, Rosalía Demetrio-Pablo, Iván Ferraz-Amaro, Santos Castañeda, Ricardo Blanco
{"title":"使用聚类分析的肉样瘤病临床表型:一项基于西班牙人群的队列研究。","authors":"Raúl Fernández-Ramón, Jorge Javier Gaitán-Valdizán, José Luis Martín-Varillas, Rosalía Demetrio-Pablo, Iván Ferraz-Amaro, Santos Castañeda, Ricardo Blanco","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/q2idtc","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sarcoidosis is a clinically heterogenous disease. The objective of this study is the identification of clinical phenotypes using cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model-based clustering relaying on 19 clinical variables was performed in a retrospective cohort of 342 sarcoidosis patients, diagnosed and followed-up from 1999 to 2019 in a tertiary hospital at Northern Spain. Chi-square test and ANOVA were used to compare categorical and continuous variables among groups. Two-sample t-tests and the partition of Pearson's chi-square statistic were used in pairwise comparisons. The Wasfi severity score was calculated and compared among clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster analysis identified five groups: C1 (16.1%), C2 (14.3%), C3 (24.3%), C4 (5.0%), and C5 (40.4%). Lung involvement was predominant, ranging from 55.1% (C2) to 100% (C1 and C4). Extrapulmonary involvement was significantly higher in C2 (96.4%) and C3 (98.0%). A significant lower FEV1 percent predicted was detected in C5 (90.5±21.8) versus C1 (102.0±22.9), C3 (102.3±17.6) and C4 (105.8±20.8). The cluster 5 had a lower FVC percent predicted (96.6±18.9) than others, ranging from 108.1±18.0 (C3) to 111.5±21.7 (C4). The prescription of systemic glucocorticoids and non-corticosteroid immunosuppressants was higher in the clusters 1, 3 and 5. Chronicity rates were higher in C3 (31.3%) and C5 (32.6%) compared to C1 (9.1%) and C4 (0%), as well as the Wasfi severity score values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Five phenotypes with different clinical and prognostic characteristics are proposed in our study. Cluster analysis can be a useful tool for identifying clinical patterns in a disease as heterogeneous as sarcoidosis and optimising its management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"2150-2158"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical phenotypes of sarcoidosis using cluster analysis: a Spanish population-based cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Raúl Fernández-Ramón, Jorge Javier Gaitán-Valdizán, José Luis Martín-Varillas, Rosalía Demetrio-Pablo, Iván Ferraz-Amaro, Santos Castañeda, Ricardo Blanco\",\"doi\":\"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/q2idtc\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Sarcoidosis is a clinically heterogenous disease. The objective of this study is the identification of clinical phenotypes using cluster analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A model-based clustering relaying on 19 clinical variables was performed in a retrospective cohort of 342 sarcoidosis patients, diagnosed and followed-up from 1999 to 2019 in a tertiary hospital at Northern Spain. Chi-square test and ANOVA were used to compare categorical and continuous variables among groups. Two-sample t-tests and the partition of Pearson's chi-square statistic were used in pairwise comparisons. The Wasfi severity score was calculated and compared among clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cluster analysis identified five groups: C1 (16.1%), C2 (14.3%), C3 (24.3%), C4 (5.0%), and C5 (40.4%). Lung involvement was predominant, ranging from 55.1% (C2) to 100% (C1 and C4). Extrapulmonary involvement was significantly higher in C2 (96.4%) and C3 (98.0%). A significant lower FEV1 percent predicted was detected in C5 (90.5±21.8) versus C1 (102.0±22.9), C3 (102.3±17.6) and C4 (105.8±20.8). The cluster 5 had a lower FVC percent predicted (96.6±18.9) than others, ranging from 108.1±18.0 (C3) to 111.5±21.7 (C4). The prescription of systemic glucocorticoids and non-corticosteroid immunosuppressants was higher in the clusters 1, 3 and 5. Chronicity rates were higher in C3 (31.3%) and C5 (32.6%) compared to C1 (9.1%) and C4 (0%), as well as the Wasfi severity score values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Five phenotypes with different clinical and prognostic characteristics are proposed in our study. Cluster analysis can be a useful tool for identifying clinical patterns in a disease as heterogeneous as sarcoidosis and optimising its management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2150-2158\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/q2idtc\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/q2idtc","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肉样瘤病是一种临床异质性疾病。本研究的目的是利用聚类分析确定临床表型:方法:对西班牙北部一家三甲医院 1999 年至 2019 年诊断和随访的 342 名肉样瘤病患者进行了基于模型的聚类分析,根据 19 个临床变量进行聚类。采用卡方检验和方差分析比较各组间的分类变量和连续变量。配对比较采用双样本 t 检验和皮尔逊卡方统计分区。计算 Wasfi 严重程度评分并在各组间进行比较:聚类分析确定了五个组别:C1(16.1%)、C2(14.3%)、C3(24.3%)、C4(5.0%)和C5(40.4%)。肺部受累占主导地位,从55.1%(C2)到100%(C1和C4)不等。C2(96.4%)和C3(98.0%)的肺外受累率明显更高。与 C1(102.0±22.9)、C3(102.3±17.6)和 C4(105.8±20.8)相比,C5(90.5±21.8)的 FEV1 预测百分比明显较低。第 5 组的预测 FVC 百分比(96.6±18.9)低于其他组,从 108.1±18.0(C3)到 111.5±21.7(C4)不等。群组 1、3 和 5 中全身使用糖皮质激素和非糖皮质激素免疫抑制剂的比例较高。与C1(9.1%)和C4(0%)以及Wasfi严重程度评分值相比,C3(31.3%)和C5(32.6%)的慢性化率更高:我们的研究提出了具有不同临床和预后特征的五种表型。聚类分析是一种有用的工具,可用于识别肉样瘤病这种异质性疾病的临床模式并优化其治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical phenotypes of sarcoidosis using cluster analysis: a Spanish population-based cohort study.

Objectives: Sarcoidosis is a clinically heterogenous disease. The objective of this study is the identification of clinical phenotypes using cluster analysis.

Methods: A model-based clustering relaying on 19 clinical variables was performed in a retrospective cohort of 342 sarcoidosis patients, diagnosed and followed-up from 1999 to 2019 in a tertiary hospital at Northern Spain. Chi-square test and ANOVA were used to compare categorical and continuous variables among groups. Two-sample t-tests and the partition of Pearson's chi-square statistic were used in pairwise comparisons. The Wasfi severity score was calculated and compared among clusters.

Results: Cluster analysis identified five groups: C1 (16.1%), C2 (14.3%), C3 (24.3%), C4 (5.0%), and C5 (40.4%). Lung involvement was predominant, ranging from 55.1% (C2) to 100% (C1 and C4). Extrapulmonary involvement was significantly higher in C2 (96.4%) and C3 (98.0%). A significant lower FEV1 percent predicted was detected in C5 (90.5±21.8) versus C1 (102.0±22.9), C3 (102.3±17.6) and C4 (105.8±20.8). The cluster 5 had a lower FVC percent predicted (96.6±18.9) than others, ranging from 108.1±18.0 (C3) to 111.5±21.7 (C4). The prescription of systemic glucocorticoids and non-corticosteroid immunosuppressants was higher in the clusters 1, 3 and 5. Chronicity rates were higher in C3 (31.3%) and C5 (32.6%) compared to C1 (9.1%) and C4 (0%), as well as the Wasfi severity score values.

Conclusions: Five phenotypes with different clinical and prognostic characteristics are proposed in our study. Cluster analysis can be a useful tool for identifying clinical patterns in a disease as heterogeneous as sarcoidosis and optimising its management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
期刊最新文献
Cluster analysis identifies the differential impact of disease activity and severity on functional status and patient satisfaction in rheumatoid arthritis: the FRANK registry. Survival and early outcomes following lung transplantation for interstitial lung disease associated with non-scleroderma connective tissue disease: a national cohort study. A Phase 3, 28-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (OA-10) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single injection of lorecivivint in the target knee joint of moderately to severely symptomatic osteoarthritis patients. Phase 3, 56-week, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study utilising patient-reported and radiographic outcomes evaluating the efficacy and safety of a lorecivivint injection in patients with moderate to severe knee osteoarthritis: OA-11 Study. The association between radiographic progression, functional impairment, markers of dyslipidaemia and inflammation in patients with hand osteoarthritis: a five-year longitudinal study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1