Lisa Gamalero, Teresa Giani, Nicola Rebellato, Veronica Lazzaretto, Stefano Martelossi, Francesca Biscaro, Giorgia Martini
{"title":"奈利膦酸钠治疗儿科 I 型复杂区域疼痛综合征的疗效和安全性:多中心经验。","authors":"Lisa Gamalero, Teresa Giani, Nicola Rebellato, Veronica Lazzaretto, Stefano Martelossi, Francesca Biscaro, Giorgia Martini","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/oak19l","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evidence regarding the efficacy of neridronate in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) is increasing, however, very little data are available in paediatric age. Our aim was to analyse the safety and the efficacy of neridronate in a case series of children with CRPS I, according to the Budapest criteria, who did not respond to previous pharmacological and physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data of children affected by CRPS I from three paediatric rheumatology centres who received neridronate. Efficacy was evaluated by changes in pain intensity, vasomotor changes, physical function, need for pain medications and MRI findings. Adverse effects were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five children (3 females and 2 males, mean age 10.4 years, range 7-13 years) who received neridronate (4 intravenous, 1 intramuscular) were included. All patients had failed previous medical treatments (NSAIDs in 4, local steroids in 2, gabapentin, vitamin D and calcium supplementation in 1) and non-medical therapies (physiotherapy in 4, magnetotherapy in 2, laser in 1). Four out of five patients reported a significant improvement in pain (average VAS pre-treatment 9.6, post-treatment 2.6), recovery of physical function, and a reduced need for pain medications. Before treatment, all patients underwent MRI which revealed bone oedema that disappeared in the three of them after treatment. Neridronate was well-tolerated as only one patient experienced mild flu-like symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that in children as in adults with CRPS I, neridronate may represent an effective and safe treatment option, particularly in those who do not respond to other pain treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of neridronate in paediatric type I complex regional pain syndrome: a multicentre experience.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Gamalero, Teresa Giani, Nicola Rebellato, Veronica Lazzaretto, Stefano Martelossi, Francesca Biscaro, Giorgia Martini\",\"doi\":\"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/oak19l\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Evidence regarding the efficacy of neridronate in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) is increasing, however, very little data are available in paediatric age. Our aim was to analyse the safety and the efficacy of neridronate in a case series of children with CRPS I, according to the Budapest criteria, who did not respond to previous pharmacological and physical therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data of children affected by CRPS I from three paediatric rheumatology centres who received neridronate. Efficacy was evaluated by changes in pain intensity, vasomotor changes, physical function, need for pain medications and MRI findings. Adverse effects were also documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five children (3 females and 2 males, mean age 10.4 years, range 7-13 years) who received neridronate (4 intravenous, 1 intramuscular) were included. All patients had failed previous medical treatments (NSAIDs in 4, local steroids in 2, gabapentin, vitamin D and calcium supplementation in 1) and non-medical therapies (physiotherapy in 4, magnetotherapy in 2, laser in 1). Four out of five patients reported a significant improvement in pain (average VAS pre-treatment 9.6, post-treatment 2.6), recovery of physical function, and a reduced need for pain medications. Before treatment, all patients underwent MRI which revealed bone oedema that disappeared in the three of them after treatment. Neridronate was well-tolerated as only one patient experienced mild flu-like symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data suggest that in children as in adults with CRPS I, neridronate may represent an effective and safe treatment option, particularly in those who do not respond to other pain treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/oak19l\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/oak19l","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的有关奈利膦酸钠治疗I型复杂性区域疼痛综合征(CRPS I)疗效的证据越来越多,但有关儿科的数据却很少。我们的目的是根据布达佩斯标准,分析奈利膦酸钠在对之前的药物和物理治疗无效的 I 型 CRPS 儿童病例系列中的安全性和疗效:我们从三个儿科风湿病中心收集了接受奈利膦酸钠治疗的 I 型 CRPS 患儿的数据。疗效通过疼痛强度、血管运动变化、身体功能、止痛药需求和磁共振成像结果的变化进行评估。此外,还记录了不良反应:共纳入5名接受奈利膦酸钠治疗的儿童(3女2男,平均年龄10.4岁,7-13岁不等)(4名静脉注射,1名肌肉注射)。所有患者都曾接受过失败的药物治疗(非甾体抗炎药 4 例、局部类固醇 2 例、加巴喷丁、维生素 D 和钙补充剂 1 例)和非药物治疗(物理疗法 4 例、磁疗 2 例、激光 1 例)。五名患者中有四名表示疼痛明显改善(治疗前平均 VAS 值为 9.6,治疗后为 2.6),身体功能得到恢复,对止痛药的需求也有所减少。治疗前,所有患者都接受了核磁共振成像检查,结果显示其中三人的骨水肿在治疗后消失。奈利膦酸钠的耐受性良好,只有一名患者出现了轻微的流感样症状:我们的数据表明,对于儿童和成人 I 型 CRPS 患者,奈利膦酸钠可能是一种有效而安全的治疗选择,尤其是对于那些对其他疼痛治疗无效的患者。
Efficacy and safety of neridronate in paediatric type I complex regional pain syndrome: a multicentre experience.
Objectives: Evidence regarding the efficacy of neridronate in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I (CRPS I) is increasing, however, very little data are available in paediatric age. Our aim was to analyse the safety and the efficacy of neridronate in a case series of children with CRPS I, according to the Budapest criteria, who did not respond to previous pharmacological and physical therapy.
Methods: We collected data of children affected by CRPS I from three paediatric rheumatology centres who received neridronate. Efficacy was evaluated by changes in pain intensity, vasomotor changes, physical function, need for pain medications and MRI findings. Adverse effects were also documented.
Results: Five children (3 females and 2 males, mean age 10.4 years, range 7-13 years) who received neridronate (4 intravenous, 1 intramuscular) were included. All patients had failed previous medical treatments (NSAIDs in 4, local steroids in 2, gabapentin, vitamin D and calcium supplementation in 1) and non-medical therapies (physiotherapy in 4, magnetotherapy in 2, laser in 1). Four out of five patients reported a significant improvement in pain (average VAS pre-treatment 9.6, post-treatment 2.6), recovery of physical function, and a reduced need for pain medications. Before treatment, all patients underwent MRI which revealed bone oedema that disappeared in the three of them after treatment. Neridronate was well-tolerated as only one patient experienced mild flu-like symptoms.
Conclusions: Our data suggest that in children as in adults with CRPS I, neridronate may represent an effective and safe treatment option, particularly in those who do not respond to other pain treatments.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.