{"title":"鼻咽部样本中未检测到 SARS-CoV-2,但在支气管肺泡液中检测到了 SARS-CoV-2。","authors":"Fucun Ma, Jiaying Hu, Mingjian Bai, Xuekai Liu, Guowei Liang","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection typically relies on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology. However, there is a certain rate of missed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples, particularly among immunosuppressed individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) using RT-PCR. Pulmonary imaging was performed using computed tomography (CT). Patient clinical data were retrieved from the Laboratory Information System (LIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 was negative in two nasopharyngeal tests of the patient, but was finally detected in BALF, confirming that the lung lesions were infected by SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the post-epidemic era, it is necessary to use BALF to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection in cases where other factors have been ruled out in immunosuppressed individuals with pulmonary infections, especially when the nasopharyngeal test yields a negative result.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":"70 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARS-CoV-2 not Detected in the Nasopharyngeal Sample but in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.\",\"authors\":\"Fucun Ma, Jiaying Hu, Mingjian Bai, Xuekai Liu, Guowei Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection typically relies on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology. However, there is a certain rate of missed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples, particularly among immunosuppressed individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this case, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) using RT-PCR. Pulmonary imaging was performed using computed tomography (CT). Patient clinical data were retrieved from the Laboratory Information System (LIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SARS-CoV-2 was negative in two nasopharyngeal tests of the patient, but was finally detected in BALF, confirming that the lung lesions were infected by SARS-CoV-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the post-epidemic era, it is necessary to use BALF to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection in cases where other factors have been ruled out in immunosuppressed individuals with pulmonary infections, especially when the nasopharyngeal test yields a negative result.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical laboratory\",\"volume\":\"70 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical laboratory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240404\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240404","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
SARS-CoV-2 not Detected in the Nasopharyngeal Sample but in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection typically relies on reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) technology. However, there is a certain rate of missed detection of SARS-CoV-2 in nasopharyngeal samples, particularly among immunosuppressed individuals.
Methods: In this case, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in nasopharyngeal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) using RT-PCR. Pulmonary imaging was performed using computed tomography (CT). Patient clinical data were retrieved from the Laboratory Information System (LIS).
Results: SARS-CoV-2 was negative in two nasopharyngeal tests of the patient, but was finally detected in BALF, confirming that the lung lesions were infected by SARS-CoV-2.
Conclusions: In the post-epidemic era, it is necessary to use BALF to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection in cases where other factors have been ruled out in immunosuppressed individuals with pulmonary infections, especially when the nasopharyngeal test yields a negative result.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.