利用氘代内标,开发一种同时测量 13 种抗癫痫药物的 UPLC-MS/MS 方法。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical laboratory Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240206
Jae Hyun Cha, Hyebin Choi, Jisook Yim, Keun Ju Kim, Minjeong Nam, Myung Hyun Nam, Chang Kyu Lee, Dae Won Kim, Yunjung Cho, Seung Gyu Yun
{"title":"利用氘代内标,开发一种同时测量 13 种抗癫痫药物的 UPLC-MS/MS 方法。","authors":"Jae Hyun Cha, Hyebin Choi, Jisook Yim, Keun Ju Kim, Minjeong Nam, Myung Hyun Nam, Chang Kyu Lee, Dae Won Kim, Yunjung Cho, Seung Gyu Yun","doi":"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this study was to develop and validate a UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous mea-surement of 13 AEDs, including carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, primidone, zonisamide, gabapentin, lacosamide, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, and vigabatrin, in whole blood samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of 13 AEDs in whole blood was developed, and validation was conducted for accuracy, precision, limit of quantification (LOQ), matrix effect, and stability. Our method was compared to two different hospitals using UPLC-MS/MS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All AEDs exhibited linearity across the AMR (analytical measurement range), with R2 values ranging from 0.994 to 1.000. The imprecision and inaccuracy for low and high quality control (QC) levels were within an acceptable range, with the coefficient of variation (CV) < 15%. The LOQ was 0.62 µg/mL for carbamazepine, 1.61 µg/mL for oxcarbazepine, 1.30 µg/mL for lamotrigine, 13.20 µg/mL for levetiracetam, 1.26 µg/mL for topira-mate, 1.01 µg/mL for primidone, 1.59 µg/mL for zonisamide, 1.09 µg/mL for lacosamide, 1.61 µg/mL for gabapentin, 0.50 µg/mL for pregabalin, 0.07 ng/mL for perampanel, 3.00 µg/mL for rufinamide, and 2.06 µg/mL for vigabatrin. All AEDs demonstrated acceptable assay parameters for carryover, stability, and matrix effects. Moreover, the assay showed satisfactory results compared to two different hospitals with a bias of less than 15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We successfully developed and validated a fast and robust UPLC-MS/MS method for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of thirteen antiepileptic drugs simultaneously.</p>","PeriodicalId":10384,"journal":{"name":"Clinical laboratory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a UPLC-MS/MS Method to Simultaneously Measure 13 Antiepileptic Drugs with Deuterated Internal Standards.\",\"authors\":\"Jae Hyun Cha, Hyebin Choi, Jisook Yim, Keun Ju Kim, Minjeong Nam, Myung Hyun Nam, Chang Kyu Lee, Dae Won Kim, Yunjung Cho, Seung Gyu Yun\",\"doi\":\"10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The goal of this study was to develop and validate a UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous mea-surement of 13 AEDs, including carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, primidone, zonisamide, gabapentin, lacosamide, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, and vigabatrin, in whole blood samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of 13 AEDs in whole blood was developed, and validation was conducted for accuracy, precision, limit of quantification (LOQ), matrix effect, and stability. Our method was compared to two different hospitals using UPLC-MS/MS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All AEDs exhibited linearity across the AMR (analytical measurement range), with R2 values ranging from 0.994 to 1.000. The imprecision and inaccuracy for low and high quality control (QC) levels were within an acceptable range, with the coefficient of variation (CV) < 15%. The LOQ was 0.62 µg/mL for carbamazepine, 1.61 µg/mL for oxcarbazepine, 1.30 µg/mL for lamotrigine, 13.20 µg/mL for levetiracetam, 1.26 µg/mL for topira-mate, 1.01 µg/mL for primidone, 1.59 µg/mL for zonisamide, 1.09 µg/mL for lacosamide, 1.61 µg/mL for gabapentin, 0.50 µg/mL for pregabalin, 0.07 ng/mL for perampanel, 3.00 µg/mL for rufinamide, and 2.06 µg/mL for vigabatrin. All AEDs demonstrated acceptable assay parameters for carryover, stability, and matrix effects. Moreover, the assay showed satisfactory results compared to two different hospitals with a bias of less than 15%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We successfully developed and validated a fast and robust UPLC-MS/MS method for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of thirteen antiepileptic drugs simultaneously.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical laboratory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical laboratory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240206\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical laboratory","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2024.240206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景本研究旨在开发并验证一种UPLC-MS/MS方法,用于同时测定全血样品中的13种AEDs,包括卡马西平、奥卡西平、拉莫三嗪、左乙拉西坦、托吡酯、普立米酮、唑尼沙胺、加巴喷丁、拉考沙胺、培南帕奈、普瑞巴林、鲁非那胺和维格巴曲林:建立了同时测定全血中13种AEDs的UPLC-MS/MS方法,并对该方法的准确度、精密度、定量限(LOQ)、基质效应和稳定性进行了验证。我们的方法与两家不同医院使用的 UPLC-MS/MS 方法进行了比较:结果:所有 AED 在 AMR(分析测量范围)内均呈线性关系,R2 值在 0.994 至 1.000 之间。低质量控制(QC)水平和高质量控制(QC)水平的不精确度和不准确度均在可接受范围内,变异系数(CV)小于 15%。卡马西平的 LOQ 为 0.62 微克/毫升,奥卡西平的 LOQ 为 1.61 微克/毫升,拉莫三嗪的 LOQ 为 1.30 微克/毫升,左乙拉西坦的 LOQ 为 13.20 微克/毫升,托吡酯的 LOQ 为 1.26 微克/毫升,普立米酮的 LOQ 为 1.01 微克/毫升,唑尼酮的 LOQ 为 1.59 微克/毫升。59微克/毫升,拉考沙胺 1.09微克/毫升,加巴喷丁 1.61微克/毫升,普瑞巴林 0.50微克/毫升,培南帕奈 0.07纳克/毫升,鲁非那胺 3.00微克/毫升,维加巴曲林 2.06微克/毫升。所有 AED 在携带、稳定性和基质效应方面的检测参数均可接受。此外,与两家不同的医院相比,化验结果令人满意,偏差小于 15%:我们成功开发并验证了一种快速、稳健的 UPLC-MS/MS 方法,可同时对 13 种抗癫痫药物进行常规治疗药物监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a UPLC-MS/MS Method to Simultaneously Measure 13 Antiepileptic Drugs with Deuterated Internal Standards.

Background: The goal of this study was to develop and validate a UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous mea-surement of 13 AEDs, including carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, topiramate, primidone, zonisamide, gabapentin, lacosamide, perampanel, pregabalin, rufinamide, and vigabatrin, in whole blood samples.

Methods: A UPLC-MS/MS method for simultaneous determination of 13 AEDs in whole blood was developed, and validation was conducted for accuracy, precision, limit of quantification (LOQ), matrix effect, and stability. Our method was compared to two different hospitals using UPLC-MS/MS.

Results: All AEDs exhibited linearity across the AMR (analytical measurement range), with R2 values ranging from 0.994 to 1.000. The imprecision and inaccuracy for low and high quality control (QC) levels were within an acceptable range, with the coefficient of variation (CV) < 15%. The LOQ was 0.62 µg/mL for carbamazepine, 1.61 µg/mL for oxcarbazepine, 1.30 µg/mL for lamotrigine, 13.20 µg/mL for levetiracetam, 1.26 µg/mL for topira-mate, 1.01 µg/mL for primidone, 1.59 µg/mL for zonisamide, 1.09 µg/mL for lacosamide, 1.61 µg/mL for gabapentin, 0.50 µg/mL for pregabalin, 0.07 ng/mL for perampanel, 3.00 µg/mL for rufinamide, and 2.06 µg/mL for vigabatrin. All AEDs demonstrated acceptable assay parameters for carryover, stability, and matrix effects. Moreover, the assay showed satisfactory results compared to two different hospitals with a bias of less than 15%.

Conclusions: We successfully developed and validated a fast and robust UPLC-MS/MS method for routine therapeutic drug monitoring of thirteen antiepileptic drugs simultaneously.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical laboratory
Clinical laboratory 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
494
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Laboratory is an international fully peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of laboratory medicine and transfusion medicine. In addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies. The journal publishes original articles, review articles, posters, short reports, case studies and letters to the editor dealing with 1) the scientific background, implementation and diagnostic significance of laboratory methods employed in hospitals, blood banks and physicians'' offices and with 2) scientific, administrative and clinical aspects of transfusion medicine and 3) in addition to transfusion medicine topics Clinical Laboratory represents submissions concerning tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular and gene therapies.
期刊最新文献
One Case of Abnormal Decrease of Interferon Gamma Release Assay Result Caused by Melphalan. Pulmonary Crystal-Storing Histiocytosis Misdiagnosed as Lung Cancer. Reference Intervals of Renal Function Set Established for Healthy Pregnant Women. SARS-CoV-2 not Detected in the Nasopharyngeal Sample but in Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid. The Diagnostic and Therapeutic Value of Anti CCP Antibodies and Double Stranded DNA in Rhupus Syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1