DeepPlaq:基于深度神经网络的牙菌斑索引。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Clinical Oral Investigations Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1007/s00784-024-05921-x
Xu Chen, Yiran Shen, Jin-Sun Jeong, Hiran Perinpanayagam, Kee-Yeon Kum, Yu Gu
{"title":"DeepPlaq:基于深度神经网络的牙菌斑索引。","authors":"Xu Chen, Yiran Shen, Jin-Sun Jeong, Hiran Perinpanayagam, Kee-Yeon Kum, Yu Gu","doi":"10.1007/s00784-024-05921-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The selection of treatment for dental plaque is closely related to the condition of the plaque on different teeth. This study validated the ability of CNN models in assessing the dental plaque indices.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In 70 (20 male and 50 female) healthy adults (18 to 55 years old), frontal and lateral view intraoral images (210) of plaque disclosing agent stained permanent and deciduous dentitions were obtained. A three-stage method was employed, where the You Look Only Once version 8 (YOLOv8) model was first used to detect the target teeth, followed by the prompt-based Segment Anything Model (SAM) segmentation algorithm to segment teeth. A new single-tooth dataset consisting of 1400 photographs was obtained after applying a two-stage method. Finally, a multi-class classification model DeepPlaq was trained and evaluated on the accuracy of dental plaque indexing based on the Quigley-Hein Index (QHI) scoring system. Classification performance was measured using accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The teeth detector exhibited an accuracy (mean average precision, mAP) of approximately 0.941 ± 0.005 in identifying teeth with plaque disclosing agents. The maximum accuracy attained in the plaque indexing through DeepPlaq was 0.84 (probability that DeepPlaq scored identical to experts), and the smallest average scoring error was less than 0.25 on a 0 to 5 scale for scoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A three-stage approach demonstrated excellent performance in detecting and segmenting target teeth, and DeepPlaq model also showed strong performance in assessing dental plaque indices.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Application of artificial intelligence to the evaluation of dental plaque distribution could enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency and accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10461,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oral Investigations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DeepPlaq: Dental plaque indexing based on deep neural networks.\",\"authors\":\"Xu Chen, Yiran Shen, Jin-Sun Jeong, Hiran Perinpanayagam, Kee-Yeon Kum, Yu Gu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00784-024-05921-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The selection of treatment for dental plaque is closely related to the condition of the plaque on different teeth. This study validated the ability of CNN models in assessing the dental plaque indices.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In 70 (20 male and 50 female) healthy adults (18 to 55 years old), frontal and lateral view intraoral images (210) of plaque disclosing agent stained permanent and deciduous dentitions were obtained. A three-stage method was employed, where the You Look Only Once version 8 (YOLOv8) model was first used to detect the target teeth, followed by the prompt-based Segment Anything Model (SAM) segmentation algorithm to segment teeth. A new single-tooth dataset consisting of 1400 photographs was obtained after applying a two-stage method. Finally, a multi-class classification model DeepPlaq was trained and evaluated on the accuracy of dental plaque indexing based on the Quigley-Hein Index (QHI) scoring system. Classification performance was measured using accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The teeth detector exhibited an accuracy (mean average precision, mAP) of approximately 0.941 ± 0.005 in identifying teeth with plaque disclosing agents. The maximum accuracy attained in the plaque indexing through DeepPlaq was 0.84 (probability that DeepPlaq scored identical to experts), and the smallest average scoring error was less than 0.25 on a 0 to 5 scale for scoring.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A three-stage approach demonstrated excellent performance in detecting and segmenting target teeth, and DeepPlaq model also showed strong performance in assessing dental plaque indices.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Application of artificial intelligence to the evaluation of dental plaque distribution could enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency and accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Oral Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05921-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oral Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05921-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:牙菌斑治疗方法的选择与不同牙齿上的牙菌斑状况密切相关。本研究验证了 CNN 模型评估牙菌斑指数的能力:在 70 名(20 名男性和 50 名女性)健康成年人(18 至 55 岁)中,获取了牙菌斑暴露剂染色的恒牙和乳牙的正面和侧面口内图像(210)。该方法分为三个阶段,首先使用 "你只看一次 "第 8 版(YOLOv8)模型检测目标牙齿,然后使用基于提示的 "任意模型分割"(SAM)分割算法分割牙齿。应用两阶段方法后,得到了一个由 1400 张照片组成的新的单颗牙齿数据集。最后,根据 Quigley-Hein 指数(QHI)评分系统对多类分类模型 DeepPlaq 进行了训练,并评估了牙菌斑索引的准确性。分类性能采用准确度、召回率、精确度和 F1 分数来衡量:牙齿检测器在识别牙菌斑披露剂牙齿方面的准确度(平均精度,mAP)约为 0.941 ± 0.005。通过 DeepPlaq 进行牙菌斑索引的最高精确度为 0.84(DeepPlaq 的评分与专家评分相同的概率),最小平均评分误差小于 0.25(评分标准为 0 至 5):结论:三阶段方法在检测和分割目标牙齿方面表现出色,DeepPlaq 模型在评估牙菌斑指数方面也表现出色:临床意义:将人工智能应用于牙菌斑分布评估可提高诊断准确性、治疗效率和准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DeepPlaq: Dental plaque indexing based on deep neural networks.

Objectives: The selection of treatment for dental plaque is closely related to the condition of the plaque on different teeth. This study validated the ability of CNN models in assessing the dental plaque indices.

Materials and methods: In 70 (20 male and 50 female) healthy adults (18 to 55 years old), frontal and lateral view intraoral images (210) of plaque disclosing agent stained permanent and deciduous dentitions were obtained. A three-stage method was employed, where the You Look Only Once version 8 (YOLOv8) model was first used to detect the target teeth, followed by the prompt-based Segment Anything Model (SAM) segmentation algorithm to segment teeth. A new single-tooth dataset consisting of 1400 photographs was obtained after applying a two-stage method. Finally, a multi-class classification model DeepPlaq was trained and evaluated on the accuracy of dental plaque indexing based on the Quigley-Hein Index (QHI) scoring system. Classification performance was measured using accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-score.

Results: The teeth detector exhibited an accuracy (mean average precision, mAP) of approximately 0.941 ± 0.005 in identifying teeth with plaque disclosing agents. The maximum accuracy attained in the plaque indexing through DeepPlaq was 0.84 (probability that DeepPlaq scored identical to experts), and the smallest average scoring error was less than 0.25 on a 0 to 5 scale for scoring.

Conclusions: A three-stage approach demonstrated excellent performance in detecting and segmenting target teeth, and DeepPlaq model also showed strong performance in assessing dental plaque indices.

Clinical relevance: Application of artificial intelligence to the evaluation of dental plaque distribution could enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficiency and accuracy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Oral Investigations
Clinical Oral Investigations 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal Clinical Oral Investigations is a multidisciplinary, international forum for publication of research from all fields of oral medicine. The journal publishes original scientific articles and invited reviews which provide up-to-date results of basic and clinical studies in oral and maxillofacial science and medicine. The aim is to clarify the relevance of new results to modern practice, for an international readership. Coverage includes maxillofacial and oral surgery, prosthetics and restorative dentistry, operative dentistry, endodontics, periodontology, orthodontics, dental materials science, clinical trials, epidemiology, pedodontics, oral implant, preventive dentistiry, oral pathology, oral basic sciences and more.
期刊最新文献
Effective doses of scout projections in maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography. Oral health in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A cross-sectional survey in Sweden. A retrospective comparative cephalometric evaluation of non-extraction multiloop edgewise archwire and bicuspid extraction therapies in anterior open bite treatment. Comparative assessment of the stability of buccal shelf mini-screws with and without pre-drilling- a split-mouth, randomized controlled trial. Cytotoxicity assessment of eluates from vacuum-forming thermoplastics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1