合并症对老年人癫痫手术疗效的影响。

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1111/epi.18103
Carolyn Tsai, Sara Taylor, Nicolas Thompson, Deborah Vegh, William Bingaman, Lara Jehi, Vineet Punia
{"title":"合并症对老年人癫痫手术疗效的影响。","authors":"Carolyn Tsai,&nbsp;Sara Taylor,&nbsp;Nicolas Thompson,&nbsp;Deborah Vegh,&nbsp;William Bingaman,&nbsp;Lara Jehi,&nbsp;Vineet Punia","doi":"10.1111/epi.18103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We lack knowledge about prognostic factors of resective epilepsy surgery (RES) in older adults (≥60 years), especially the role of comorbidities, which are a major consideration in managing the care of people with epilepsy (PWE). We analyzed a single-center cohort of 94 older adults (median age = 63.5 years, 52% females) who underwent RES between 2000 and 2021 with at least 6 months of postsurgical follow-up. Three fourths of the study cohort had lesional magnetic resonance imaging and underwent temporal lobectomy. Fifty-four (57%) PWE remained seizure-free during a median follow-up of 3.5 years. Cox proportional hazard multivariable analysis showed that aura (hazard ratio [HR] = .52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .27–1.00), single ictal electroencephalographic pattern (HR = .33, 95% CI = .17–.660), and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00–1.10) were independently associated with seizure recurrence at last follow-up. A sensitivity analysis using the Charlson Combined Score (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.03–1.84, <i>p</i> = .027) confirmed the association of comorbidities with worse seizure outcome. Our findings provide a framework for a better informed discussion about RES prognosis in older adults. More extensive, multicenter cohort studies are needed to validate our findings and reduce hesitancy in pursuing RES in suitable older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":"65 11","pages":"e190-e196"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of comorbidities in epilepsy surgery outcomes of older adults\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn Tsai,&nbsp;Sara Taylor,&nbsp;Nicolas Thompson,&nbsp;Deborah Vegh,&nbsp;William Bingaman,&nbsp;Lara Jehi,&nbsp;Vineet Punia\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/epi.18103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We lack knowledge about prognostic factors of resective epilepsy surgery (RES) in older adults (≥60 years), especially the role of comorbidities, which are a major consideration in managing the care of people with epilepsy (PWE). We analyzed a single-center cohort of 94 older adults (median age = 63.5 years, 52% females) who underwent RES between 2000 and 2021 with at least 6 months of postsurgical follow-up. Three fourths of the study cohort had lesional magnetic resonance imaging and underwent temporal lobectomy. Fifty-four (57%) PWE remained seizure-free during a median follow-up of 3.5 years. Cox proportional hazard multivariable analysis showed that aura (hazard ratio [HR] = .52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .27–1.00), single ictal electroencephalographic pattern (HR = .33, 95% CI = .17–.660), and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00–1.10) were independently associated with seizure recurrence at last follow-up. A sensitivity analysis using the Charlson Combined Score (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.03–1.84, <i>p</i> = .027) confirmed the association of comorbidities with worse seizure outcome. Our findings provide a framework for a better informed discussion about RES prognosis in older adults. More extensive, multicenter cohort studies are needed to validate our findings and reduce hesitancy in pursuing RES in suitable older adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epilepsia\",\"volume\":\"65 11\",\"pages\":\"e190-e196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/epi.18103\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epilepsia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18103\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.18103","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对老年人(≥60 岁)癫痫切除手术(RES)的预后因素缺乏了解,尤其是合并症的作用,而合并症是癫痫患者(PWE)护理管理中的一个主要考虑因素。我们分析了单中心队列中的 94 名老年人(中位年龄 = 63.5 岁,52% 为女性),他们在 2000 年至 2021 年期间接受了 RES 手术,术后随访至少 6 个月。研究队列中有四分之三的人有病变磁共振成像,并接受了颞叶切除术。54名(57%)PWE患者在中位随访3.5年期间没有癫痫发作。Cox 比例危险多变量分析显示,先兆(危险比 [HR] = .52,95% 置信区间 [CI] = .27-1.00)、单一发作性脑电图模式(HR = .33,95% CI = .17-.660)和 Elixhauser 合并症指数(HR = 1.05,95% CI = 1.00-1.10)与最后一次随访时的癫痫复发独立相关。使用 Charlson 综合评分进行的敏感性分析(HR = 1.38,95% CI = 1.03-1.84,p = .027)证实了合并症与较差的癫痫发作预后相关。我们的研究结果为更好地讨论老年人的 RES 预后提供了一个框架。需要更广泛的多中心队列研究来验证我们的发现,并减少合适的老年人在寻求 RES 时的犹豫不决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of comorbidities in epilepsy surgery outcomes of older adults

We lack knowledge about prognostic factors of resective epilepsy surgery (RES) in older adults (≥60 years), especially the role of comorbidities, which are a major consideration in managing the care of people with epilepsy (PWE). We analyzed a single-center cohort of 94 older adults (median age = 63.5 years, 52% females) who underwent RES between 2000 and 2021 with at least 6 months of postsurgical follow-up. Three fourths of the study cohort had lesional magnetic resonance imaging and underwent temporal lobectomy. Fifty-four (57%) PWE remained seizure-free during a median follow-up of 3.5 years. Cox proportional hazard multivariable analysis showed that aura (hazard ratio [HR] = .52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .27–1.00), single ictal electroencephalographic pattern (HR = .33, 95% CI = .17–.660), and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 1.00–1.10) were independently associated with seizure recurrence at last follow-up. A sensitivity analysis using the Charlson Combined Score (HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.03–1.84, p = .027) confirmed the association of comorbidities with worse seizure outcome. Our findings provide a framework for a better informed discussion about RES prognosis in older adults. More extensive, multicenter cohort studies are needed to validate our findings and reduce hesitancy in pursuing RES in suitable older adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Effect of in utero exposure to antiepileptic drugs on cortical networks and neurophysiological outcomes at 6 years. Effectiveness of sodium channel blockers in treating neonatal seizures due to arterial ischemic stroke. Structural connectivity changes in focal epilepsy: Beyond the epileptogenic zone. Efficacy and safety of perampanel in patients with seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: A randomized trial. Focal negative motor seizures: Multimodal evaluation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1