以解剖学为基础的适配改善了单侧耳聋人工耳蜗植入者在噪音中的语音感知。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s00405-024-08984-4
Anja Kurz, David Herrmann, Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff, Johannes Voelker, Stephan Hackenberg, Kristen Rak
{"title":"以解剖学为基础的适配改善了单侧耳聋人工耳蜗植入者在噪音中的语音感知。","authors":"Anja Kurz, David Herrmann, Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff, Johannes Voelker, Stephan Hackenberg, Kristen Rak","doi":"10.1007/s00405-024-08984-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate objective and subjective hearing outcomes in experienced cochlear implant users with single sided deafness (SSD CI) who used fitting maps created via anatomy-based fitting (ABF) and clinically-based fitting (CBF).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twelve SSD CI users with postlingual hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>OTOPLAN (Version 3. (MED-EL) was used to determine intracochlear electrode contact positions using post-operative high-resolution flat panel volume computed tomography. From these positions, the corresponding center frequencies and bandwidths were derived for each channel. These were implemented in the clinical fitting software MAESTRO to yield an ABF map individualized to each user.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>ABF and CBF maps were compared. Objective speech perception in quiet and in noise, binaural effects, and self-perceived sound quality were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher speech perception in noise scores were observed with the ABF map compared to the CBF map (mean SRT<sub>50</sub>: -6.49 vs. -4.8 dB SNR for the S<sub>0</sub>N<sub>CI</sub> configuration and - 3.85 vs. -2.75 dB SNR for the S<sub>0</sub>N<sub>0</sub> configuration). Summation and squelch effects were significantly increased with the ABF map (0.86 vs. 0.21 dB SNR for summation and 0.85 vs. -0.09 dB SNR for squelch). No improvement in speech perception in quiet or spatial release from masking were observed with the ABF map. A similar level of self-perceived sound quality was reported for each map. Upon the end of the study, all users opted to keep the ABF map. This preference was independent of the angular insertion depth of the electrode array.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experienced SSD CI users preferred using the ABF map, which gave them significant improvements in binaural hearing and some aspects of speech perception.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomy-based fitting improves speech perception in noise for cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness.\",\"authors\":\"Anja Kurz, David Herrmann, Franz-Tassilo Müller-Graff, Johannes Voelker, Stephan Hackenberg, Kristen Rak\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00405-024-08984-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate objective and subjective hearing outcomes in experienced cochlear implant users with single sided deafness (SSD CI) who used fitting maps created via anatomy-based fitting (ABF) and clinically-based fitting (CBF).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Twelve SSD CI users with postlingual hearing loss.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>OTOPLAN (Version 3. (MED-EL) was used to determine intracochlear electrode contact positions using post-operative high-resolution flat panel volume computed tomography. From these positions, the corresponding center frequencies and bandwidths were derived for each channel. These were implemented in the clinical fitting software MAESTRO to yield an ABF map individualized to each user.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>ABF and CBF maps were compared. Objective speech perception in quiet and in noise, binaural effects, and self-perceived sound quality were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher speech perception in noise scores were observed with the ABF map compared to the CBF map (mean SRT<sub>50</sub>: -6.49 vs. -4.8 dB SNR for the S<sub>0</sub>N<sub>CI</sub> configuration and - 3.85 vs. -2.75 dB SNR for the S<sub>0</sub>N<sub>0</sub> configuration). Summation and squelch effects were significantly increased with the ABF map (0.86 vs. 0.21 dB SNR for summation and 0.85 vs. -0.09 dB SNR for squelch). No improvement in speech perception in quiet or spatial release from masking were observed with the ABF map. A similar level of self-perceived sound quality was reported for each map. Upon the end of the study, all users opted to keep the ABF map. This preference was independent of the angular insertion depth of the electrode array.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Experienced SSD CI users preferred using the ABF map, which gave them significant improvements in binaural hearing and some aspects of speech perception.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08984-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08984-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估经验丰富的单侧耳聋(SSD CI)人工耳蜗用户的客观和主观听力结果,这些用户使用的是通过基于解剖的适配(ABF)和基于临床的适配(CBF)创建的适配图:12 名患有舌后听力损失的 SSD CI 用户:使用术后高分辨率平板容积计算机断层扫描确定耳蜗内电极接触位置。根据这些位置,得出每个通道的相应中心频率和带宽。这些都被应用到临床拟合软件 MAESTRO 中,以生成针对每个用户的个性化 ABF 地图:对 ABF 和 CBF 地图进行比较。主要结果测量:比较 ABF 图和 CBF 图,评估安静和噪声中的客观语音感知、双耳效应和自我感觉音质:与 CBF 地图相比,ABF 地图的噪声语音感知得分明显更高(平均 SRT50:S0NCI 配置为-6.49 vs. -4.8 dB SNR,S0N0 配置为-3.85 vs. -2.75 dB SNR)。使用 ABF 地图后,求和效应和静噪效应明显增加(求和信噪比为 0.86 对 0.21 分贝,静噪信噪比为 0.85 对 -0.09 分贝)。使用 ABF 地图后,安静环境中的语音感知和空间掩蔽释放均未得到改善。据报告,每种地图的自我感觉音质水平相似。研究结束时,所有用户都选择保留 ABF 地图。这种偏好与电极阵列的角度插入深度无关:结论:有经验的 SSD CI 用户更喜欢使用 ABF 地图,它能显著改善他们的双耳听力和某些方面的言语感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anatomy-based fitting improves speech perception in noise for cochlear implant recipients with single-sided deafness.

Objective: To evaluate objective and subjective hearing outcomes in experienced cochlear implant users with single sided deafness (SSD CI) who used fitting maps created via anatomy-based fitting (ABF) and clinically-based fitting (CBF).

Participants: Twelve SSD CI users with postlingual hearing loss.

Intervention: OTOPLAN (Version 3. (MED-EL) was used to determine intracochlear electrode contact positions using post-operative high-resolution flat panel volume computed tomography. From these positions, the corresponding center frequencies and bandwidths were derived for each channel. These were implemented in the clinical fitting software MAESTRO to yield an ABF map individualized to each user.

Main outcome measures: ABF and CBF maps were compared. Objective speech perception in quiet and in noise, binaural effects, and self-perceived sound quality were evaluated.

Results: Significantly higher speech perception in noise scores were observed with the ABF map compared to the CBF map (mean SRT50: -6.49 vs. -4.8 dB SNR for the S0NCI configuration and - 3.85 vs. -2.75 dB SNR for the S0N0 configuration). Summation and squelch effects were significantly increased with the ABF map (0.86 vs. 0.21 dB SNR for summation and 0.85 vs. -0.09 dB SNR for squelch). No improvement in speech perception in quiet or spatial release from masking were observed with the ABF map. A similar level of self-perceived sound quality was reported for each map. Upon the end of the study, all users opted to keep the ABF map. This preference was independent of the angular insertion depth of the electrode array.

Conclusions: Experienced SSD CI users preferred using the ABF map, which gave them significant improvements in binaural hearing and some aspects of speech perception.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1