基于人工智能的腰椎中央管狭窄分类在矢状磁共振图像上与使用轴向图像的经验丰富的放射科医生不相上下。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1007/s00330-024-11080-0
Jasper W van der Graaf, Liron Brundel, Miranda L van Hooff, Marinus de Kleuver, Nikolas Lessmann, Bas J Maresch, Myrthe M Vestering, Jacco Spermon, Bram van Ginneken, Matthieu J C M Rutten
{"title":"基于人工智能的腰椎中央管狭窄分类在矢状磁共振图像上与使用轴向图像的经验丰富的放射科医生不相上下。","authors":"Jasper W van der Graaf, Liron Brundel, Miranda L van Hooff, Marinus de Kleuver, Nikolas Lessmann, Bas J Maresch, Myrthe M Vestering, Jacco Spermon, Bram van Ginneken, Matthieu J C M Rutten","doi":"10.1007/s00330-024-11080-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The assessment of lumbar central canal stenosis (LCCS) is crucial for diagnosing and planning treatment for patients with low back pain and neurogenic pain. However, manual assessment methods are time-consuming, variable, and require axial MRIs. The aim of this study is to develop and validate an AI-based model that automatically classifies LCCS using sagittal T2-weighted MRIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-existing 3D AI algorithm was utilized to segment the spinal canal and intervertebral discs (IVDs), enabling quantitative measurements at each IVD level. Four musculoskeletal radiologists graded 683 IVD levels from 186 LCCS patients using the 4-class Lee grading system. A second consensus reading was conducted by readers 1 and 2, which, along with automatic measurements, formed the training dataset for a multiclass (grade 0-3) and binary (grade 0-1 vs. 2-3) random forest classifier with tenfold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multiclass model achieved a Cohen's weighted kappa of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.90), comparable to readers 3 and 4 with 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.89) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.79) respectively. The binary model demonstrated an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99), sensitivity of 93% (95% CI: 91-96%), and specificity of 91% (95% CI: 87-95%). In comparison, readers 3 and 4 achieved a specificity of 98 and 99% and sensitivity of 74 and 54%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the multiclass and binary models, while only using sagittal MR images, perform on par with experienced radiologists who also had access to axial sequences. This underscores the potential of this novel algorithm in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in medical imaging.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question How can the classification of lumbar central canal stenosis (LCCS) be made more efficient? Findings Multiclass and binary AI models, using only sagittal MR images, performed on par with experienced radiologists who also had access to axial sequences. Clinical relevance Our AI algorithm accurately classifies LCCS from sagittal MRI, matching experienced radiologists. This study offers a promising tool for automated LCCS assessment from sagittal T2 MRI, potentially reducing the reliance on additional axial imaging.</p>","PeriodicalId":12076,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"AI-based lumbar central canal stenosis classification on sagittal MR images is comparable to experienced radiologists using axial images.\",\"authors\":\"Jasper W van der Graaf, Liron Brundel, Miranda L van Hooff, Marinus de Kleuver, Nikolas Lessmann, Bas J Maresch, Myrthe M Vestering, Jacco Spermon, Bram van Ginneken, Matthieu J C M Rutten\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00330-024-11080-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The assessment of lumbar central canal stenosis (LCCS) is crucial for diagnosing and planning treatment for patients with low back pain and neurogenic pain. However, manual assessment methods are time-consuming, variable, and require axial MRIs. The aim of this study is to develop and validate an AI-based model that automatically classifies LCCS using sagittal T2-weighted MRIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pre-existing 3D AI algorithm was utilized to segment the spinal canal and intervertebral discs (IVDs), enabling quantitative measurements at each IVD level. Four musculoskeletal radiologists graded 683 IVD levels from 186 LCCS patients using the 4-class Lee grading system. A second consensus reading was conducted by readers 1 and 2, which, along with automatic measurements, formed the training dataset for a multiclass (grade 0-3) and binary (grade 0-1 vs. 2-3) random forest classifier with tenfold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The multiclass model achieved a Cohen's weighted kappa of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.90), comparable to readers 3 and 4 with 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.89) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.79) respectively. The binary model demonstrated an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99), sensitivity of 93% (95% CI: 91-96%), and specificity of 91% (95% CI: 87-95%). In comparison, readers 3 and 4 achieved a specificity of 98 and 99% and sensitivity of 74 and 54%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both the multiclass and binary models, while only using sagittal MR images, perform on par with experienced radiologists who also had access to axial sequences. This underscores the potential of this novel algorithm in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in medical imaging.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question How can the classification of lumbar central canal stenosis (LCCS) be made more efficient? Findings Multiclass and binary AI models, using only sagittal MR images, performed on par with experienced radiologists who also had access to axial sequences. Clinical relevance Our AI algorithm accurately classifies LCCS from sagittal MRI, matching experienced radiologists. This study offers a promising tool for automated LCCS assessment from sagittal T2 MRI, potentially reducing the reliance on additional axial imaging.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11080-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-024-11080-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腰椎中央管狭窄症(LCCS)的评估对于腰痛和神经源性疼痛患者的诊断和治疗计划至关重要。然而,人工评估方法费时、易变,而且需要轴向核磁共振成像。本研究旨在开发并验证一种基于人工智能的模型,该模型可使用矢状位 T2 加权核磁共振成像对 LCCS 进行自动分类:方法: 利用已有的三维人工智能算法对椎管和椎间盘(IVD)进行分割,从而对每个 IVD 水平进行定量测量。四名肌肉骨骼放射科医生采用李氏四级分级系统对 186 名 LCCS 患者的 683 个 IVD 水平进行了分级。由读者 1 和读者 2 进行第二次共识阅读,连同自动测量结果,构成多分类(0-3 级)和二元(0-1 级与 2-3 级)随机森林分类器的训练数据集,并进行十倍交叉验证:多分类模型的科恩加权卡帕值为 0.86(95% CI:0.82-0.90),与读者 3 和读者 4 的 0.85(95% CI:0.80-0.89)和 0.73(95% CI:0.68-0.79)相当。二元模型的 AUC 为 0.98(95% CI:0.97-0.99),灵敏度为 93%(95% CI:91-96%),特异度为 91%(95% CI:87-95%)。相比之下,读者 3 和读者 4 的特异性分别为 98% 和 99%,灵敏度分别为 74% 和 54%:结论:多类模型和二元模型虽然只使用了矢状磁共振图像,但其表现与经验丰富且能获得轴向序列的放射科医生不相上下。这凸显了这种新型算法在提高医学影像诊断准确性和效率方面的潜力:问题 如何提高腰椎中央管狭窄症(LCCS)的分类效率?研究结果 仅使用矢状位磁共振图像的多类和二元人工智能模型的表现与经验丰富的放射科医生相当,后者也能获得轴向序列。临床意义 我们的人工智能算法能从矢状磁共振成像中准确地对 LCCS 进行分类,与经验丰富的放射科医生不相上下。这项研究为通过矢状位 T2 MRI 自动评估 LCCS 提供了一种很有前景的工具,有可能减少对额外轴向成像的依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AI-based lumbar central canal stenosis classification on sagittal MR images is comparable to experienced radiologists using axial images.

Objectives: The assessment of lumbar central canal stenosis (LCCS) is crucial for diagnosing and planning treatment for patients with low back pain and neurogenic pain. However, manual assessment methods are time-consuming, variable, and require axial MRIs. The aim of this study is to develop and validate an AI-based model that automatically classifies LCCS using sagittal T2-weighted MRIs.

Methods: A pre-existing 3D AI algorithm was utilized to segment the spinal canal and intervertebral discs (IVDs), enabling quantitative measurements at each IVD level. Four musculoskeletal radiologists graded 683 IVD levels from 186 LCCS patients using the 4-class Lee grading system. A second consensus reading was conducted by readers 1 and 2, which, along with automatic measurements, formed the training dataset for a multiclass (grade 0-3) and binary (grade 0-1 vs. 2-3) random forest classifier with tenfold cross-validation.

Results: The multiclass model achieved a Cohen's weighted kappa of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.82-0.90), comparable to readers 3 and 4 with 0.85 (95% CI: 0.80-0.89) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.79) respectively. The binary model demonstrated an AUC of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99), sensitivity of 93% (95% CI: 91-96%), and specificity of 91% (95% CI: 87-95%). In comparison, readers 3 and 4 achieved a specificity of 98 and 99% and sensitivity of 74 and 54%, respectively.

Conclusion: Both the multiclass and binary models, while only using sagittal MR images, perform on par with experienced radiologists who also had access to axial sequences. This underscores the potential of this novel algorithm in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency in medical imaging.

Key points: Question How can the classification of lumbar central canal stenosis (LCCS) be made more efficient? Findings Multiclass and binary AI models, using only sagittal MR images, performed on par with experienced radiologists who also had access to axial sequences. Clinical relevance Our AI algorithm accurately classifies LCCS from sagittal MRI, matching experienced radiologists. This study offers a promising tool for automated LCCS assessment from sagittal T2 MRI, potentially reducing the reliance on additional axial imaging.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology
European Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
8.50%
发文量
874
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: European Radiology (ER) continuously updates scientific knowledge in radiology by publication of strong original articles and state-of-the-art reviews written by leading radiologists. A well balanced combination of review articles, original papers, short communications from European radiological congresses and information on society matters makes ER an indispensable source for current information in this field. This is the Journal of the European Society of Radiology, and the official journal of a number of societies. From 2004-2008 supplements to European Radiology were published under its companion, European Radiology Supplements, ISSN 1613-3749.
期刊最新文献
Reply to Letter to the Editor: "Ultra-low-dose vs. standard-of-care-dose CT of the chest in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions-a prospective intra-patient multi-reader study". Interval breast cancer rates for tomosynthesis vs mammography population screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Letter to the Editor: "Ultra-low-dose vs standard-of-care-dose CT of the chest in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions-a prospective intra-patient multi-reader study". Alveolar membrane and capillary function in COVID-19 convalescents: insights from chest MRI. High-performance presurgical differentiation of glioblastoma and metastasis by means of multiparametric neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) radiomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1