基于血液检测结直肠癌的多基因甲基化评估

IF 1.1 4区 生物学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1089/gtmb.2023.0754
Yingshuo Xu, Ailin Tan, Rui Liang, Huaidong Qu, Xiankun Li, Zhiqiang Wang
{"title":"基于血液检测结直肠癌的多基因甲基化评估","authors":"Yingshuo Xu, Ailin Tan, Rui Liang, Huaidong Qu, Xiankun Li, Zhiqiang Wang","doi":"10.1089/gtmb.2023.0754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Early screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has the potential to improve patient prognosis, but current screening methods are limited. In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the multigene (<i>Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5,</i> and <i>IKZF1</i>) detection in patient plasma for CRC diagnosis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Overall, 67 participants were enrolled, including 31 patients with CRC, 17 patients with colorectal polyp, and 19 normal controls who underwent colonoscopy. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and <i>Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5</i>, and <i>IKZF1</i> methylation tests were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of each biomarker. The association between positive rates of methylated <i>Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5</i>, and <i>IKZF1</i> and the clinicopathological characteristics of CRC was also analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The positive rate of multigene methylation detection was 87.1% (27/31) in patients with CRC, which was higher than single indicators: CEA (51.61%, 16/31), <i>Septin9</i> (41.94%, 13/31), <i>SDC2</i> (41.94%, 13/31), <i>KCNQ5</i> (58.06%, 18/31), and <i>IKZF1</i> (32.26%, 10/31). In the colorectal polyp group, the rate of multigene methylation detection is 88.24% (15/17), which was also higher than single indicator: CEA (17.65%, 3/17), <i>Septin9</i> (11.76%, 2/17), <i>SDC2</i> (64.71%, 11/17), <i>KCNQ5</i> (58.82%, 10/17), and <i>IKZF1</i> (35.29%, 6/17). The ROC curves further showed better diagnostic value of the multigene test for CRC than any single gene. Correlation analysis found that the positive rate of the test was not affected by patients' clinicopathologic characteristics. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The combination of methylated <i>Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5</i>, and <i>IKZF1</i> tests is preferable to individual gene tests for patients with CRC and polyp.</p>","PeriodicalId":12603,"journal":{"name":"Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers","volume":" ","pages":"402-409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Multigene Methylation for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Yingshuo Xu, Ailin Tan, Rui Liang, Huaidong Qu, Xiankun Li, Zhiqiang Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/gtmb.2023.0754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Early screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has the potential to improve patient prognosis, but current screening methods are limited. In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the multigene (<i>Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5,</i> and <i>IKZF1</i>) detection in patient plasma for CRC diagnosis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Overall, 67 participants were enrolled, including 31 patients with CRC, 17 patients with colorectal polyp, and 19 normal controls who underwent colonoscopy. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and <i>Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5</i>, and <i>IKZF1</i> methylation tests were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of each biomarker. The association between positive rates of methylated <i>Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5</i>, and <i>IKZF1</i> and the clinicopathological characteristics of CRC was also analyzed. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The positive rate of multigene methylation detection was 87.1% (27/31) in patients with CRC, which was higher than single indicators: CEA (51.61%, 16/31), <i>Septin9</i> (41.94%, 13/31), <i>SDC2</i> (41.94%, 13/31), <i>KCNQ5</i> (58.06%, 18/31), and <i>IKZF1</i> (32.26%, 10/31). In the colorectal polyp group, the rate of multigene methylation detection is 88.24% (15/17), which was also higher than single indicator: CEA (17.65%, 3/17), <i>Septin9</i> (11.76%, 2/17), <i>SDC2</i> (64.71%, 11/17), <i>KCNQ5</i> (58.82%, 10/17), and <i>IKZF1</i> (35.29%, 6/17). The ROC curves further showed better diagnostic value of the multigene test for CRC than any single gene. Correlation analysis found that the positive rate of the test was not affected by patients' clinicopathologic characteristics. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> The combination of methylated <i>Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5</i>, and <i>IKZF1</i> tests is preferable to individual gene tests for patients with CRC and polyp.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"402-409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2023.0754\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/gtmb.2023.0754","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:结直肠癌(CRC)的早期筛查有可能改善患者的预后,但目前的筛查方法有限。在这项前瞻性研究中,我们旨在评估患者血浆中用于诊断 CRC 的多基因(Septin9、SDC2、KCNQ5 和 IKZF1)检测情况。方法:共招募了 67 名参与者,包括 31 名接受结肠镜检查的 CRC 患者、17 名大肠息肉患者和 19 名正常对照者。进行了癌胚抗原(CEA)和 Septin9、SDC2、KCNQ5 和 IKZF1 甲基化检测。灵敏度、特异性和接收者操作特征曲线下面积用于评估每种生物标记物的诊断价值。此外,还分析了Septin9、SDC2、KCNQ5和IKZF1甲基化阳性率与CRC临床病理特征之间的关联。结果显示多基因甲基化检测在 CRC 患者中的阳性率为 87.1%(27/31),高于单一指标:CEA(51.61%,16/31)、Septin9(41.94%,13/31)、SDC2(41.94%,13/31)、KCNQ5(58.06%,18/31)和IKZF1(32.26%,10/31)。在结直肠息肉组中,多基因甲基化检测率为 88.24%(15/17),也高于单一指标:CEA(17.65%,3/17)、Septin9(11.76%,2/17)、SDC2(64.71%,11/17)、KCNQ5(58.82%,10/17)和 IKZF1(35.29%,6/17)。ROC 曲线进一步显示,多基因检测对 CRC 的诊断价值优于任何单一基因。相关分析发现,检测的阳性率不受患者临床病理特征的影响。结论对于 CRC 和息肉患者来说,甲基化 Septin9、SDC2、KCNQ5 和 IKZF1 联合检测优于单个基因检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Multigene Methylation for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer.

Background: Early screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has the potential to improve patient prognosis, but current screening methods are limited. In this prospective study, we aimed to evaluate the multigene (Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5, and IKZF1) detection in patient plasma for CRC diagnosis. Methods: Overall, 67 participants were enrolled, including 31 patients with CRC, 17 patients with colorectal polyp, and 19 normal controls who underwent colonoscopy. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5, and IKZF1 methylation tests were performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of each biomarker. The association between positive rates of methylated Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5, and IKZF1 and the clinicopathological characteristics of CRC was also analyzed. Results: The positive rate of multigene methylation detection was 87.1% (27/31) in patients with CRC, which was higher than single indicators: CEA (51.61%, 16/31), Septin9 (41.94%, 13/31), SDC2 (41.94%, 13/31), KCNQ5 (58.06%, 18/31), and IKZF1 (32.26%, 10/31). In the colorectal polyp group, the rate of multigene methylation detection is 88.24% (15/17), which was also higher than single indicator: CEA (17.65%, 3/17), Septin9 (11.76%, 2/17), SDC2 (64.71%, 11/17), KCNQ5 (58.82%, 10/17), and IKZF1 (35.29%, 6/17). The ROC curves further showed better diagnostic value of the multigene test for CRC than any single gene. Correlation analysis found that the positive rate of the test was not affected by patients' clinicopathologic characteristics. Conclusion: The combination of methylated Septin9, SDC2, KCNQ5, and IKZF1 tests is preferable to individual gene tests for patients with CRC and polyp.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
63
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers is the leading peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of human genetic testing including molecular biomarkers. The Journal provides a forum for the development of new technology; the application of testing to decision making in an increasingly varied set of clinical situations; ethical, legal, social, and economic aspects of genetic testing; and issues concerning effective genetic counseling. This is the definitive resource for researchers, clinicians, and scientists who develop, perform, and interpret genetic tests and their results. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers coverage includes: -Diagnosis across the life span- Risk assessment- Carrier detection in individuals, couples, and populations- Novel methods and new instrumentation for genetic testing- Results of molecular, biochemical, and cytogenetic testing- Genetic counseling
期刊最新文献
Association of ANRIL Gene Polymorphisms with Gastric Cancer Risk: A Case-Control Study. Immune Regulatory Circular RNAs, circRasGEF1B and circHIPK3, are Upregulated in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells of COVID-19 Patients. Differential Analysis of Pathogenic Variants in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection at Different Ages. Evaluation of Multigene Methylation for Blood-Based Detection of Colorectal Cancer. Human Leukocyte Antigen-G Gene Polymorphism in Peninsular Malaysia: A Preliminary Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1