器械脊柱融合术后骶髂关节融合的风险因素。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1177/21925682241286458
Peter Z Du, Gurmit Singh, Spencer Smith, Travis Philipp, Jonathan Kark, Clifford Lin, Jung U Yoo
{"title":"器械脊柱融合术后骶髂关节融合的风险因素。","authors":"Peter Z Du, Gurmit Singh, Spencer Smith, Travis Philipp, Jonathan Kark, Clifford Lin, Jung U Yoo","doi":"10.1177/21925682241286458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion after instrumented spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified from the PearlDiver BiscayneBay database. Patients who underwent 1 level (CPT: 22840), 3-6 vertebral segment (22842), and 7+ vertebral segment spinal fusions (22843 and 22844) were identified. Patients were separated based on whether they received an SI joint fusion (27280 and 27279) after their spinal fusion. A univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between patient factors and incidence of SI joint fusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>549,625 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusions were identified, 6068 of whom underwent subsequent SI joint fusion (1.1%). Factors associated with future SI joint fusion included female gender, patients with obesity, fibromyalgia, diabetes, tobacco use, increased construct length, and prior SI joint injection. Prior SI joint injection had the highest odds ratio (OR: 8.70; 95% CI: 8.25-9.16; <i>P</i> < 0.001), followed by 7+ vertebral segment (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 2.03-2.33; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 3-6 vertebral segment fusion (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.42-1.57; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest predictor of requiring subsequent SI joint fusion is a prior SI joint injection. We also found that longer fusion constructs are associated with increased risk for future SI joint fusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Factors for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion after Instrumented Spinal Fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Peter Z Du, Gurmit Singh, Spencer Smith, Travis Philipp, Jonathan Kark, Clifford Lin, Jung U Yoo\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21925682241286458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective Cohort Study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify risk factors for sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion after instrumented spinal fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were identified from the PearlDiver BiscayneBay database. Patients who underwent 1 level (CPT: 22840), 3-6 vertebral segment (22842), and 7+ vertebral segment spinal fusions (22843 and 22844) were identified. Patients were separated based on whether they received an SI joint fusion (27280 and 27279) after their spinal fusion. A univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between patient factors and incidence of SI joint fusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>549,625 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusions were identified, 6068 of whom underwent subsequent SI joint fusion (1.1%). Factors associated with future SI joint fusion included female gender, patients with obesity, fibromyalgia, diabetes, tobacco use, increased construct length, and prior SI joint injection. Prior SI joint injection had the highest odds ratio (OR: 8.70; 95% CI: 8.25-9.16; <i>P</i> < 0.001), followed by 7+ vertebral segment (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 2.03-2.33; <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 3-6 vertebral segment fusion (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.42-1.57; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest predictor of requiring subsequent SI joint fusion is a prior SI joint injection. We also found that longer fusion constructs are associated with increased risk for future SI joint fusion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241286458\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241286458","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计回顾性队列研究:确定器械脊柱融合术后骶髂关节(SI)融合的风险因素:从PearlDiver BiscayneBay数据库中识别患者。确定了接受 1 级(CPT:22840)、3-6 椎节(22842)和 7+ 椎节脊柱融合术(22843 和 22844)的患者。根据患者在脊柱融合术后是否接受了 SI 关节融合术(27280 和 27279)将其分开。通过单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归来评估患者因素与 SI 关节融合术发生率之间的关系:结果:共发现了 549,625 名接受脊柱后路融合术的患者,其中 6068 人随后接受了 SI 关节融合术(1.1%)。与未来SI关节融合术相关的因素包括:女性、肥胖、纤维肌痛、糖尿病、吸烟、构造长度增加以及曾接受过SI关节注射。曾进行SI关节注射的几率比最高(OR:8.70;95% CI:8.25-9.16;P<0.001),其次是7+椎节(OR:2.17;95% CI:2.03-2.33;P<0.001)和3-6椎节融合(OR:1.49;95% CI:1.42-1.57;P<0.001):结论:预测后续 SI 关节融合需要的最高指标是之前的 SI 关节注射。我们还发现,较长的融合结构与未来 SI 关节融合的风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk Factors for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion after Instrumented Spinal Fusion.

Study design: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objective: To identify risk factors for sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion after instrumented spinal fusion.

Methods: Patients were identified from the PearlDiver BiscayneBay database. Patients who underwent 1 level (CPT: 22840), 3-6 vertebral segment (22842), and 7+ vertebral segment spinal fusions (22843 and 22844) were identified. Patients were separated based on whether they received an SI joint fusion (27280 and 27279) after their spinal fusion. A univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between patient factors and incidence of SI joint fusion.

Results: 549,625 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusions were identified, 6068 of whom underwent subsequent SI joint fusion (1.1%). Factors associated with future SI joint fusion included female gender, patients with obesity, fibromyalgia, diabetes, tobacco use, increased construct length, and prior SI joint injection. Prior SI joint injection had the highest odds ratio (OR: 8.70; 95% CI: 8.25-9.16; P < 0.001), followed by 7+ vertebral segment (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 2.03-2.33; P < 0.001) and 3-6 vertebral segment fusion (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.42-1.57; P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The highest predictor of requiring subsequent SI joint fusion is a prior SI joint injection. We also found that longer fusion constructs are associated with increased risk for future SI joint fusion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
Prevalence and Clinical Impact of Coronal Malalignment Following Circumferential Minimally Invasive Surgery (CMIS) for Adult Spinal Deformity Correction. Current Applications and Future Implications of Artificial Intelligence in Spine Surgery and Research: A Narrative Review and Commentary. Surgical Specialty Outcome Differences for Major Spinal Procedures in Low-Acuity Patients. The Effect of Osteopenia and Osteoporosis on Screw Loosening in MIS-TLIF and Dynamic Stabilization. Learning Curve of Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant and Aggregated Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1