间歇性气压疗法对乳腺癌相关上肢淋巴水肿的疗效:临床研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Gland surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.21037/gs-24-123
Shengqun Hou, Yun Li, Weiwu Lu, Xiaoju Zhang, Huiyu Luo, Jiajia Qiu, Zhenqi Lu
{"title":"间歇性气压疗法对乳腺癌相关上肢淋巴水肿的疗效:临床研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Shengqun Hou, Yun Li, Weiwu Lu, Xiaoju Zhang, Huiyu Luo, Jiajia Qiu, Zhenqi Lu","doi":"10.21037/gs-24-123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complete decongestive therapy (CDT) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) are the most common combination of treatments in breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema. The effects of IPC as an addition to CDT are inconsistent in different studies. This meta-analysis aimed to explore whether IPC could bring additional benefits to CDT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literatures were retrieved from databases with full-text publications ranging from January 1995 to March 2024. Fixed-effect models were applied to subsequent analysis if no heterogeneity was detected by using the Inverse formula. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg's test and Eagger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were finally included for further analysis. Results showed that additional application of IPC to CDT could further improve lymphedema within 4 weeks after the treatment period [standard mean difference (SMD) =-0.2 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.33 to -0.07 mL]. However, this additional benefit was weakened within about 9.4±2.6 weeks' follow-up duration after ceasing physical therapy (SMD =-0.15 mL, 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.04 mL).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Periodically continuous treatment should be suggested to maintain the effect of CDT + IPC to promote lymph drainage and lymphedema improvement. Nonetheless, the treatment involved in the studies ranged from 4 to 12 weeks, therefore potential bias might exist.</p>","PeriodicalId":12760,"journal":{"name":"Gland surgery","volume":"13 8","pages":"1358-1369"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399013/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression on breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis in clinical studies.\",\"authors\":\"Shengqun Hou, Yun Li, Weiwu Lu, Xiaoju Zhang, Huiyu Luo, Jiajia Qiu, Zhenqi Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/gs-24-123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complete decongestive therapy (CDT) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) are the most common combination of treatments in breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema. The effects of IPC as an addition to CDT are inconsistent in different studies. This meta-analysis aimed to explore whether IPC could bring additional benefits to CDT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literatures were retrieved from databases with full-text publications ranging from January 1995 to March 2024. Fixed-effect models were applied to subsequent analysis if no heterogeneity was detected by using the Inverse formula. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg's test and Eagger's test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were finally included for further analysis. Results showed that additional application of IPC to CDT could further improve lymphedema within 4 weeks after the treatment period [standard mean difference (SMD) =-0.2 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.33 to -0.07 mL]. However, this additional benefit was weakened within about 9.4±2.6 weeks' follow-up duration after ceasing physical therapy (SMD =-0.15 mL, 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.04 mL).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Periodically continuous treatment should be suggested to maintain the effect of CDT + IPC to promote lymph drainage and lymphedema improvement. Nonetheless, the treatment involved in the studies ranged from 4 to 12 weeks, therefore potential bias might exist.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gland surgery\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"1358-1369\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399013/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gland surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gland surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/gs-24-123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:完全缓解充血疗法(CDT)和间歇性气压疗法(IPC)是治疗乳腺癌相关上肢淋巴水肿最常见的组合疗法。在不同的研究中,IPC作为CDT的补充治疗效果并不一致。本荟萃分析旨在探讨 IPC 是否能为 CDT 带来额外的益处:方法:从数据库中检索 1995 年 1 月至 2024 年 3 月发表的全文文献。如果使用逆公式未发现异质性,则在后续分析中采用固定效应模型。采用 Begg 检验和 Eagger 检验评估发表偏倚:最终纳入了 12 项研究进行进一步分析。结果显示,在 CDT 基础上额外应用 IPC 可进一步改善治疗期后 4 周内的淋巴水肿[标准平均差 (SMD) =-0.2 mL,95% 置信区间 (CI):-0.33 至 -0.07 mL]。然而,在停止物理治疗后约9.4±2.6周的随访时间内,这种额外的益处有所减弱(SMD =-0.15 mL,95% 置信区间:-0.33 至 0.04 mL):结论:为保持 CDT + IPC 促进淋巴引流和改善淋巴水肿的效果,建议定期进行持续治疗。尽管如此,研究中涉及的治疗时间从4周到12周不等,因此可能存在偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of intermittent pneumatic compression on breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema: a systematic review and meta-analysis in clinical studies.

Background: Complete decongestive therapy (CDT) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) are the most common combination of treatments in breast cancer-related upper limb lymphedema. The effects of IPC as an addition to CDT are inconsistent in different studies. This meta-analysis aimed to explore whether IPC could bring additional benefits to CDT.

Methods: Literatures were retrieved from databases with full-text publications ranging from January 1995 to March 2024. Fixed-effect models were applied to subsequent analysis if no heterogeneity was detected by using the Inverse formula. Publication bias was assessed using the Begg's test and Eagger's test.

Results: Twelve studies were finally included for further analysis. Results showed that additional application of IPC to CDT could further improve lymphedema within 4 weeks after the treatment period [standard mean difference (SMD) =-0.2 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.33 to -0.07 mL]. However, this additional benefit was weakened within about 9.4±2.6 weeks' follow-up duration after ceasing physical therapy (SMD =-0.15 mL, 95% CI: -0.33 to 0.04 mL).

Conclusions: Periodically continuous treatment should be suggested to maintain the effect of CDT + IPC to promote lymph drainage and lymphedema improvement. Nonetheless, the treatment involved in the studies ranged from 4 to 12 weeks, therefore potential bias might exist.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gland surgery
Gland surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
113
期刊介绍: Gland Surgery (Gland Surg; GS, Print ISSN 2227-684X; Online ISSN 2227-8575) being indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central, is an open access, peer-review journal launched at May of 2012, published bio-monthly since February 2015.
期刊最新文献
Preoperative approach and technical considerations in parotid surgery. Preparation and characterization of a rat uterine decellularized scaffold. Propensity analysis reveals survival disparities between T1a and T1b well-differentiated thyroid cancer based on surgery. Repeat breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for in breast tumor recurrence after initial BCS for ductal carcinoma in situ. Risk factors for increased drain output after endoscopic thyroidectomy via areola approach: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1