用 TMR 和 RPNI 管理前臂截肢者的主要外周神经:最佳配方是什么?

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS HAND Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1177/15589447241277842
Andrew B Rees, Julia C Mastracci, Samuel L Posey, Bryan J Loeffler, R Glenn Gaston
{"title":"用 TMR 和 RPNI 管理前臂截肢者的主要外周神经:最佳配方是什么?","authors":"Andrew B Rees, Julia C Mastracci, Samuel L Posey, Bryan J Loeffler, R Glenn Gaston","doi":"10.1177/15589447241277842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) prevent symptomatic neuroma formation in amputees. Forearm-level amputations present multiple muscular targets, making it challenging to determine the ideal treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best TMR targets, role of RPNI, and appropriate patient-selection criteria in forearm-level amputations. We hypothesized that deep and distal TMR targets would best prevent symptomatic neuromas, RPNI would prove a success adjunct, and patients with poorly controlled diabetes would not develop symptomatic neuromas regardless of nerve management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified forearm-level amputations performed between 2017 and 2022. Patients with TMR by outside providers, follow-up <6 months, or insufficient documentation were excluded. Demographics, surgical nerve management, and postoperative complications were collected. The primary outcome was development of a painful neuroma determined by the Eberlin criteria. Patients undergoing TMR were divided a priori into two groups, superficial and proximal versus deep and distal TMR targets, and were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, and 16 developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patients with a deep or distal TMR target developed a symptomatic neuroma. One nerve out of 12 treated with RPNI developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patient with poorly controlled diabetes developed a symptomatic neuroma, despite no advanced nerve management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a case series of forearm amputations, deep and distal TMR targets prevented symptomatic neuroma formation more than superficial and proximal targets. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface is a useful adjunct for neuroma control, especially for the radial sensory nerve. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes may not require advanced nerve management.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447241277842"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Major Peripheral Nerves in Forearm-Level Amputations With TMR and RPNI: What's the Best Recipe?\",\"authors\":\"Andrew B Rees, Julia C Mastracci, Samuel L Posey, Bryan J Loeffler, R Glenn Gaston\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15589447241277842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) prevent symptomatic neuroma formation in amputees. Forearm-level amputations present multiple muscular targets, making it challenging to determine the ideal treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best TMR targets, role of RPNI, and appropriate patient-selection criteria in forearm-level amputations. We hypothesized that deep and distal TMR targets would best prevent symptomatic neuromas, RPNI would prove a success adjunct, and patients with poorly controlled diabetes would not develop symptomatic neuromas regardless of nerve management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively identified forearm-level amputations performed between 2017 and 2022. Patients with TMR by outside providers, follow-up <6 months, or insufficient documentation were excluded. Demographics, surgical nerve management, and postoperative complications were collected. The primary outcome was development of a painful neuroma determined by the Eberlin criteria. Patients undergoing TMR were divided a priori into two groups, superficial and proximal versus deep and distal TMR targets, and were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, and 16 developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patients with a deep or distal TMR target developed a symptomatic neuroma. One nerve out of 12 treated with RPNI developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patient with poorly controlled diabetes developed a symptomatic neuroma, despite no advanced nerve management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a case series of forearm amputations, deep and distal TMR targets prevented symptomatic neuroma formation more than superficial and proximal targets. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface is a useful adjunct for neuroma control, especially for the radial sensory nerve. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes may not require advanced nerve management.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV retrospective case series.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HAND\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"15589447241277842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559940/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HAND\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241277842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241277842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:靶向肌肉神经支配(TMR)和再生外周神经接口(RPNI)可预防截肢者症状性神经瘤的形成。前臂水平截肢有多个肌肉靶点,因此确定理想的治疗方法具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估前臂截肢的最佳 TMR 靶点、RPNI 的作用以及适当的患者选择标准。我们假设,深部和远端 TMR 靶点能最好地预防症状性神经瘤,RPNI 将被证明是一种成功的辅助治疗方法,而糖尿病控制不佳的患者无论采用何种神经管理方法都不会出现症状性神经瘤:我们回顾性地确定了2017年至2022年期间进行的前臂水平截肢手术。由外部医疗机构进行 TMR 的患者,随访结果:39例患者符合纳入标准,16例出现了症状性神经瘤。没有深部或远端 TMR 目标患者出现症状性神经瘤。在接受 RPNI 治疗的 12 条神经中,有一条出现了症状性神经瘤。尽管没有对神经进行晚期处理,但没有控制不佳的糖尿病患者出现症状性神经瘤:在一系列前臂截肢病例中,深部和远端 TMR 靶点比浅部和近端靶点更能防止症状性神经瘤的形成。再生外周神经接口是控制神经瘤的有效辅助手段,尤其是对于桡侧感觉神经。糖尿病控制不佳的患者可能不需要高级神经管理:证据级别:IV 级回顾性病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Managing Major Peripheral Nerves in Forearm-Level Amputations With TMR and RPNI: What's the Best Recipe?

Background: Targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR) and regenerative peripheral nerve interface (RPNI) prevent symptomatic neuroma formation in amputees. Forearm-level amputations present multiple muscular targets, making it challenging to determine the ideal treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best TMR targets, role of RPNI, and appropriate patient-selection criteria in forearm-level amputations. We hypothesized that deep and distal TMR targets would best prevent symptomatic neuromas, RPNI would prove a success adjunct, and patients with poorly controlled diabetes would not develop symptomatic neuromas regardless of nerve management.

Methods: We retrospectively identified forearm-level amputations performed between 2017 and 2022. Patients with TMR by outside providers, follow-up <6 months, or insufficient documentation were excluded. Demographics, surgical nerve management, and postoperative complications were collected. The primary outcome was development of a painful neuroma determined by the Eberlin criteria. Patients undergoing TMR were divided a priori into two groups, superficial and proximal versus deep and distal TMR targets, and were compared.

Results: Thirty-nine patients met inclusion criteria, and 16 developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patients with a deep or distal TMR target developed a symptomatic neuroma. One nerve out of 12 treated with RPNI developed a symptomatic neuroma. No patient with poorly controlled diabetes developed a symptomatic neuroma, despite no advanced nerve management.

Conclusions: In a case series of forearm amputations, deep and distal TMR targets prevented symptomatic neuroma formation more than superficial and proximal targets. Regenerative peripheral nerve interface is a useful adjunct for neuroma control, especially for the radial sensory nerve. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes may not require advanced nerve management.

Level of evidence: Level IV retrospective case series.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of 2 Types of Local Anesthetic Techniques in the Reduction of Distal Radius Fracture: A Prospective Cohort Study. Ischemia Time in Extremity Allotransplantation: A Comprehensive Review. The Super-Turbocharged End-to-Side Abductor Digiti Minimi and Anterior Interosseous Double Nerve Transfer Is Associated With Improved Ulnar Intrinsic Function. Chatbot Demonstrates Moderate Interrater Reliability in Billing for Hand Surgery Clinic Encounters. Financial Toxicity Among Patients With Traumatic Finger Amputation: A Retrospective Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1