单侧慢性血栓栓塞性肺病:患者是否受益于血栓内膜切除术?来自三个 CTEPH 中心的病例系列。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Heart, Lung and Circulation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2024.06.049
Farid Rashidi, Bedrettin Yıldızeli, Rezayat Parvizi, Serpil Taş, Şehnaz Olgun Yıldızeli, Bülent Mutlu, Eisa Bilehjani, Babak Mahmoudian, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Seyed Ali Mousavi-Aghdas, Gustavo A Heresi
{"title":"单侧慢性血栓栓塞性肺病:患者是否受益于血栓内膜切除术?来自三个 CTEPH 中心的病例系列。","authors":"Farid Rashidi, Bedrettin Yıldızeli, Rezayat Parvizi, Serpil Taş, Şehnaz Olgun Yıldızeli, Bülent Mutlu, Eisa Bilehjani, Babak Mahmoudian, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Seyed Ali Mousavi-Aghdas, Gustavo A Heresi","doi":"10.1016/j.hlc.2024.06.049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unilateral chronic thromboembolism pulmonary disease (CTEPD) is very rare. There is limited information on the safety and efficacy of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in this population. This study investigated the effectiveness of PEA in this unique disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre study included patients with unilateral CTEPD from three referral centres in the United States, Turkey, and Iran. The patients' demographic information, 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and haemodynamics were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Of the 1,031 patients who had undergone PEA, 39 patients (3.7%) had pure unilateral involvement, of whom 28 were female (71.8%). There was a significant improvement in the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP, 26 mmHg vs 21 mmHg; p=0.011) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR, 202 vs 136 dynes∗sec<sup>1</sup>∗cm<sup>-5</sup>; p=0.014). There was also a significant improvement in NYHA functional class (p<0.001) and 6MWD (360 vs 409 m; p<0.001). In the nine patients with normal haemodynamic parameters at rest, there was no significant change in median 6MWD (448.5 vs 449 m; p=0.208), mPAP (19 mmHg vs 16.5 mmHg; p=0.397), and PVR (129 vs 84.5 dynes∗sec<sup>1</sup>∗cm<sup>-5</sup>; p=0.128). The most common postoperative complication was ipsilateral pleural effusion. One patient needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. No patient died within the 1-year follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pulmonary endarterectomy is a safe and effective procedure for improving the symptoms and haemodynamic parameters of patients with unilateral CTEPH. Symptomatic patients with unilateral chronic thromboembolic disease are suitable for PEA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13000,"journal":{"name":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unilateral Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease: Do Patients Benefit From Thromboendarterectomy? Case Series From Three CTEPH Centres.\",\"authors\":\"Farid Rashidi, Bedrettin Yıldızeli, Rezayat Parvizi, Serpil Taş, Şehnaz Olgun Yıldızeli, Bülent Mutlu, Eisa Bilehjani, Babak Mahmoudian, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Seyed Ali Mousavi-Aghdas, Gustavo A Heresi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hlc.2024.06.049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unilateral chronic thromboembolism pulmonary disease (CTEPD) is very rare. There is limited information on the safety and efficacy of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in this population. This study investigated the effectiveness of PEA in this unique disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicentre study included patients with unilateral CTEPD from three referral centres in the United States, Turkey, and Iran. The patients' demographic information, 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and haemodynamics were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Of the 1,031 patients who had undergone PEA, 39 patients (3.7%) had pure unilateral involvement, of whom 28 were female (71.8%). There was a significant improvement in the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP, 26 mmHg vs 21 mmHg; p=0.011) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR, 202 vs 136 dynes∗sec<sup>1</sup>∗cm<sup>-5</sup>; p=0.014). There was also a significant improvement in NYHA functional class (p<0.001) and 6MWD (360 vs 409 m; p<0.001). In the nine patients with normal haemodynamic parameters at rest, there was no significant change in median 6MWD (448.5 vs 449 m; p=0.208), mPAP (19 mmHg vs 16.5 mmHg; p=0.397), and PVR (129 vs 84.5 dynes∗sec<sup>1</sup>∗cm<sup>-5</sup>; p=0.128). The most common postoperative complication was ipsilateral pleural effusion. One patient needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. No patient died within the 1-year follow up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pulmonary endarterectomy is a safe and effective procedure for improving the symptoms and haemodynamic parameters of patients with unilateral CTEPH. Symptomatic patients with unilateral chronic thromboembolic disease are suitable for PEA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart, Lung and Circulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2024.06.049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart, Lung and Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2024.06.049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:单侧慢性血栓栓塞性肺病(CTEPD)非常罕见:单侧慢性血栓栓塞性肺病(CTEPD)非常罕见。关于肺动脉内膜剥脱术(PEA)在这一人群中的安全性和有效性的信息非常有限。本研究探讨了肺动脉内膜剥脱术(PEA)在这种特殊疾病中的有效性:这项多中心研究纳入了来自美国、土耳其和伊朗三个转诊中心的单侧 CTEPD 患者。对患者的人口统计学信息、6 分钟步行测试距离(6MWD)、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)功能分级和血液动力学进行了评估:在 1031 名接受过 PEA 的患者中,39 名患者(3.7%)为纯粹的单侧受累,其中 28 名为女性(71.8%)。平均肺动脉压(mPAP,26 mmHg vs 21 mmHg;P=0.011)和肺血管阻力(PVR,202 vs 136 dynes∗sec1∗cm-5;P=0.014)均有明显改善。NYHA 功能分级也有明显改善(p1∗cm-5;p=0.128)。最常见的术后并发症是同侧胸腔积液。一名患者需要体外膜氧合支持。在一年的随访中,没有患者死亡:肺动脉内膜剥脱术是一种安全有效的手术,可改善单侧 CTEPH 患者的症状和血流动力学参数。有症状的单侧慢性血栓栓塞性疾病患者适合接受肺动脉内膜剥脱术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unilateral Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Disease: Do Patients Benefit From Thromboendarterectomy? Case Series From Three CTEPH Centres.

Background: Unilateral chronic thromboembolism pulmonary disease (CTEPD) is very rare. There is limited information on the safety and efficacy of pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in this population. This study investigated the effectiveness of PEA in this unique disease.

Methods: This multicentre study included patients with unilateral CTEPD from three referral centres in the United States, Turkey, and Iran. The patients' demographic information, 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, and haemodynamics were evaluated.

Result: Of the 1,031 patients who had undergone PEA, 39 patients (3.7%) had pure unilateral involvement, of whom 28 were female (71.8%). There was a significant improvement in the mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP, 26 mmHg vs 21 mmHg; p=0.011) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR, 202 vs 136 dynes∗sec1∗cm-5; p=0.014). There was also a significant improvement in NYHA functional class (p<0.001) and 6MWD (360 vs 409 m; p<0.001). In the nine patients with normal haemodynamic parameters at rest, there was no significant change in median 6MWD (448.5 vs 449 m; p=0.208), mPAP (19 mmHg vs 16.5 mmHg; p=0.397), and PVR (129 vs 84.5 dynes∗sec1∗cm-5; p=0.128). The most common postoperative complication was ipsilateral pleural effusion. One patient needed extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. No patient died within the 1-year follow up.

Conclusion: Pulmonary endarterectomy is a safe and effective procedure for improving the symptoms and haemodynamic parameters of patients with unilateral CTEPH. Symptomatic patients with unilateral chronic thromboembolic disease are suitable for PEA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heart, Lung and Circulation
Heart, Lung and Circulation CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.80%
发文量
912
审稿时长
11.9 weeks
期刊介绍: Heart, Lung and Circulation publishes articles integrating clinical and research activities in the fields of basic cardiovascular science, clinical cardiology and cardiac surgery, with a focus on emerging issues in cardiovascular disease. The journal promotes multidisciplinary dialogue between cardiologists, cardiothoracic surgeons, cardio-pulmonary physicians and cardiovascular scientists.
期刊最新文献
A Prediction Rule for Occurrence of Chronic Thromboembolic Disease After Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Venous and Arterial Thrombosis in COVID-19: A Nationwide Inpatient Analysis. Long-Term Echocardiographic and Clinical Outcomes After Invasive and Non-Invasive Therapies for Sub-Massive and Massive Acute Pulmonary Embolism. Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disparities in Management of Embolic Stroke: A Western Sydney Perspective. Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Low-Dose Tirofiban in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1