重症患者使用β-内酰胺类抗生素和环丙沙星的目标达标率及其与 28 天死亡率的关系。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of critical care Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154904
Sarah Dräger, Tim M J Ewoldt, Alan Abdulla, Wim J R Rietdijk, Nelianne J Verkaik, Peter van Vliet, Ilse M Purmer, Michael Osthoff, Birgit C P Koch, Henrik Endeman
{"title":"重症患者使用β-内酰胺类抗生素和环丙沙星的目标达标率及其与 28 天死亡率的关系。","authors":"Sarah Dräger, Tim M J Ewoldt, Alan Abdulla, Wim J R Rietdijk, Nelianne J Verkaik, Peter van Vliet, Ilse M Purmer, Michael Osthoff, Birgit C P Koch, Henrik Endeman","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess pharmacodynamic target attainment in critically ill patients and identify factors influencing target attainment and mortality outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from the DOLPHIN trial. Beta-lactam and ciprofloxacin peak and trough concentration were measured within the first 36 h (T1) after initiation of treatment. The study outcome included the rate of pharmacodynamic target attainment of 100 % ƒT<sub>>1xEpidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF)</sub> for beta-lactams, and of fAUC<sub>0-24h</sub>/ECOFF>125 for ciprofloxacin at T1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The target attainment rates were 78.1 % (n = 228/292) for beta-lactams, and 41.5 % (n = 39/94) for ciprofloxacin, respectively. Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher SOFA score were associated with target attainment. In patients receiving beta-lactams, 28-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who attained 100 % ƒT<sub>>1xECOFF</sub> (28.9 % vs. 12.5 %; p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, attainment of 100 % ƒT<sub>>4xECOFF</sub>, but not 100 % ƒT<sub>>1xECOFF</sub>, was associated with a higher 28-day mortality (OR 2.70, 95 % CI 1.36-5.48 vs. OR 1.28, 95 % CI 0.53-3.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high rate of target attainment (100 % ƒT<sub>>1xECOFF</sub>) for beta-lactams and a lower rate for ciprofloxacin was observed. Achieving exposures of 100 % ƒT<sub>>4xECOFF</sub> was associated with 28-day mortality. The impact of antibiotic target attainment on clinical outcome needs to be a focus of future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":" ","pages":"154904"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Target attainment of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients and its association with 28-day mortality.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Dräger, Tim M J Ewoldt, Alan Abdulla, Wim J R Rietdijk, Nelianne J Verkaik, Peter van Vliet, Ilse M Purmer, Michael Osthoff, Birgit C P Koch, Henrik Endeman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154904\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to assess pharmacodynamic target attainment in critically ill patients and identify factors influencing target attainment and mortality outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed data from the DOLPHIN trial. Beta-lactam and ciprofloxacin peak and trough concentration were measured within the first 36 h (T1) after initiation of treatment. The study outcome included the rate of pharmacodynamic target attainment of 100 % ƒT<sub>>1xEpidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF)</sub> for beta-lactams, and of fAUC<sub>0-24h</sub>/ECOFF>125 for ciprofloxacin at T1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The target attainment rates were 78.1 % (n = 228/292) for beta-lactams, and 41.5 % (n = 39/94) for ciprofloxacin, respectively. Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher SOFA score were associated with target attainment. In patients receiving beta-lactams, 28-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who attained 100 % ƒT<sub>>1xECOFF</sub> (28.9 % vs. 12.5 %; p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, attainment of 100 % ƒT<sub>>4xECOFF</sub>, but not 100 % ƒT<sub>>1xECOFF</sub>, was associated with a higher 28-day mortality (OR 2.70, 95 % CI 1.36-5.48 vs. OR 1.28, 95 % CI 0.53-3.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A high rate of target attainment (100 % ƒT<sub>>1xECOFF</sub>) for beta-lactams and a lower rate for ciprofloxacin was observed. Achieving exposures of 100 % ƒT<sub>>4xECOFF</sub> was associated with 28-day mortality. The impact of antibiotic target attainment on clinical outcome needs to be a focus of future research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"154904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of critical care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154904\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154904","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估重症患者的药效学目标达成情况,并确定影响目标达成和死亡率结果的因素:我们分析了 DOLPHIN 试验的数据。我们对 DOLPHIN 试验的数据进行了分析。在开始治疗后的前 36 小时(T1)内测量了β-内酰胺类药物和环丙沙星的峰值和谷值浓度。研究结果包括β-内酰胺类药物 100 % ƒT>1x 流行病学临界值(ECOFF)和环丙沙星在 T1 的 fAUC0-24h/ECOFF>125 的药效学目标达标率:β-内酰胺类药物的达标率为 78.1%(n = 228/292),环丙沙星的达标率为 41.5%(n = 39/94)。估计肾小球滤过率较低和 SOFA 评分较高与达标率有关。在接受β-内酰胺类药物治疗的患者中,ƒT>1xECOFF达标率为100%的患者的28天死亡率明显更高(28.9% vs. 12.5%;p = 0.01)。在多变量分析中,达到 100 % ƒT>4xECOFF 的患者 28 天死亡率较高(OR 2.70,95 % CI 1.36-5.48 vs. OR 1.28,95 % CI 0.53-3.34),而达到 100 % ƒT>1xECOFF 的患者 28 天死亡率较低(OR 2.70,95 % CI 1.36-5.48 vs. OR 1.28,95 % CI 0.53-3.34):观察发现,β-内酰胺类药物的达标率较高(100 % ƒT>1xECOFF ),而环丙沙星的达标率较低。达到 100 % ƒT>4xECOFF 的暴露与 28 天死亡率有关。抗生素目标达标率对临床结果的影响需要成为未来研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Target attainment of beta-lactam antibiotics and ciprofloxacin in critically ill patients and its association with 28-day mortality.

Objectives: This study aims to assess pharmacodynamic target attainment in critically ill patients and identify factors influencing target attainment and mortality outcomes.

Methods: We analysed data from the DOLPHIN trial. Beta-lactam and ciprofloxacin peak and trough concentration were measured within the first 36 h (T1) after initiation of treatment. The study outcome included the rate of pharmacodynamic target attainment of 100 % ƒT>1xEpidemiological cut-off value (ECOFF) for beta-lactams, and of fAUC0-24h/ECOFF>125 for ciprofloxacin at T1.

Results: The target attainment rates were 78.1 % (n = 228/292) for beta-lactams, and 41.5 % (n = 39/94) for ciprofloxacin, respectively. Lower estimated glomerular filtration rate and higher SOFA score were associated with target attainment. In patients receiving beta-lactams, 28-day mortality was significantly higher in patients who attained 100 % ƒT>1xECOFF (28.9 % vs. 12.5 %; p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, attainment of 100 % ƒT>4xECOFF, but not 100 % ƒT>1xECOFF, was associated with a higher 28-day mortality (OR 2.70, 95 % CI 1.36-5.48 vs. OR 1.28, 95 % CI 0.53-3.34).

Conclusions: A high rate of target attainment (100 % ƒT>1xECOFF) for beta-lactams and a lower rate for ciprofloxacin was observed. Achieving exposures of 100 % ƒT>4xECOFF was associated with 28-day mortality. The impact of antibiotic target attainment on clinical outcome needs to be a focus of future research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
期刊最新文献
Platelet dysfunction in heatstroke-induced coagulopathy: A retrospective observational study Challenges and opportunities in antibiotic allergy de-labeling in intensive care units: The time is now! Letter to the Editor: “Outcomes of continuous renal replacement therapy versus peritoneal dialysis as a renal replacement therapy modality in patients undergoing venoarterial 72 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation” Antibiotic allergy de-labeling in the intensive care unit: The prospective ADE-ICU study The interplay between organizational culture and burnout among ICU professionals: A cross-sectional multicenter study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1