Jennifer S Albrecht, Jennifer Kirk, Kathleen A Ryan, Jason R Falvey
{"title":"邻里贫困与老年人创伤性脑损伤后的康复。","authors":"Jennifer S Albrecht, Jennifer Kirk, Kathleen A Ryan, Jason R Falvey","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Understanding the extent to which neighborhood impacts recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults could spur targeting of rehabilitation and other services to those living in more disadvantaged areas. The objective of the present study was to determine the extent to which neighborhood disadvantage influences recovery following TBI among older adults.</p><p><p>Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years hospitalized with TBI 2010-2018.</p><p><strong>Design and main measures: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to assess neighborhood deprivation by linking it to 9-digit beneficiary zip codes. We used national-level rankings to divide the cohort into the top 10% (highest neighborhood disadvantage), middle 11-90%, and bottom 10% (lowest neighborhood disadvantage). Recovery was operationalized as days at home, calculated by subtracting days spent in a care environment or deceased from monthly follow-up over the year post-TBI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 13,747 Medicare beneficiaries with TBI, 1713 (12.7%) were in the lowest decile of ADI rankings and 1030 (7.6%) were in the highest decile of ADI rankings. Following covariate adjustment, beneficiaries in neighborhoods with greatest disadvantage [rate ratio (RtR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94, 0.98] and beneficiaries in middle ADI percentiles (RtR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97, 0.99) had fewer days at home per month compared to beneficiaries in neighborhoods with lowest disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that neighborhood is associated with recovery from TBI among older adults and highlights days at home as a recovery metric that is responsive to differences in neighborhood disadvantage.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neighborhood Deprivation and Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury Among Older Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer S Albrecht, Jennifer Kirk, Kathleen A Ryan, Jason R Falvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Understanding the extent to which neighborhood impacts recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults could spur targeting of rehabilitation and other services to those living in more disadvantaged areas. The objective of the present study was to determine the extent to which neighborhood disadvantage influences recovery following TBI among older adults.</p><p><p>Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years hospitalized with TBI 2010-2018.</p><p><strong>Design and main measures: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to assess neighborhood deprivation by linking it to 9-digit beneficiary zip codes. We used national-level rankings to divide the cohort into the top 10% (highest neighborhood disadvantage), middle 11-90%, and bottom 10% (lowest neighborhood disadvantage). Recovery was operationalized as days at home, calculated by subtracting days spent in a care environment or deceased from monthly follow-up over the year post-TBI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 13,747 Medicare beneficiaries with TBI, 1713 (12.7%) were in the lowest decile of ADI rankings and 1030 (7.6%) were in the highest decile of ADI rankings. Following covariate adjustment, beneficiaries in neighborhoods with greatest disadvantage [rate ratio (RtR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94, 0.98] and beneficiaries in middle ADI percentiles (RtR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97, 0.99) had fewer days at home per month compared to beneficiaries in neighborhoods with lowest disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provides evidence that neighborhood is associated with recovery from TBI among older adults and highlights days at home as a recovery metric that is responsive to differences in neighborhood disadvantage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:了解邻里关系对老年人创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后康复的影响程度,可以促进为生活在较贫困地区的老年人提供有针对性的康复和其他服务。本研究旨在确定邻里劣势对老年人创伤性脑损伤后康复的影响程度:2010-2018年因创伤性脑损伤住院的年龄≥65岁的社区医疗保险受益人:在这项回顾性队列研究中,通过将地区贫困指数(ADI)与 9 位受益人邮政编码相联系来评估邻里贫困程度。我们使用国家级排名将队列分为前 10%(最贫困社区)、中间 11-90% 和后 10%(最贫困社区)。在创伤后一年内的每月随访中减去在护理环境中度过的天数或死亡天数,计算出在家康复的天数:在 13747 名患有创伤性脑损伤的医疗保险受益人中,有 1713 人(12.7%)处于 ADI 排名最低的十分位数,1030 人(7.6%)处于 ADI 排名最高的十分位数。经过协变量调整后,与处境最不利社区的受益人相比,处境最不利社区的受益人[比率比(RtR)为0.96;95%置信区间(CI)为0.94,0.98]和ADI百分位数居中的受益人(RtR为0.98;95% CI为0.97,0.99)每月在家的天数较少:本研究提供的证据表明,邻里关系与老年人从创伤性脑损伤中恢复有关,并强调了居家天数这一恢复指标对邻里弱势差异的反应。
Neighborhood Deprivation and Recovery Following Traumatic Brain Injury Among Older Adults.
Objective: Understanding the extent to which neighborhood impacts recovery following traumatic brain injury (TBI) among older adults could spur targeting of rehabilitation and other services to those living in more disadvantaged areas. The objective of the present study was to determine the extent to which neighborhood disadvantage influences recovery following TBI among older adults.
Setting and Participants: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years hospitalized with TBI 2010-2018.
Design and main measures: In this retrospective cohort study, the Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to assess neighborhood deprivation by linking it to 9-digit beneficiary zip codes. We used national-level rankings to divide the cohort into the top 10% (highest neighborhood disadvantage), middle 11-90%, and bottom 10% (lowest neighborhood disadvantage). Recovery was operationalized as days at home, calculated by subtracting days spent in a care environment or deceased from monthly follow-up over the year post-TBI.
Results: Among 13,747 Medicare beneficiaries with TBI, 1713 (12.7%) were in the lowest decile of ADI rankings and 1030 (7.6%) were in the highest decile of ADI rankings. Following covariate adjustment, beneficiaries in neighborhoods with greatest disadvantage [rate ratio (RtR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94, 0.98] and beneficiaries in middle ADI percentiles (RtR 0.98; 95% CI 0.97, 0.99) had fewer days at home per month compared to beneficiaries in neighborhoods with lowest disadvantage.
Conclusion: This study provides evidence that neighborhood is associated with recovery from TBI among older adults and highlights days at home as a recovery metric that is responsive to differences in neighborhood disadvantage.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).