You-Yuan Bao, Lai-Sheng Pan, Yong Cao, Jie Wu, Shen-Hao Xie, Feng Ouyang, Jian Tan, Qi-Fa Wang, Dong-Wei Zhou, Bin Tang, Tao Hong
{"title":"老年人颅咽管瘤内窥镜手术后的临床特征和治疗效果。","authors":"You-Yuan Bao, Lai-Sheng Pan, Yong Cao, Jie Wu, Shen-Hao Xie, Feng Ouyang, Jian Tan, Qi-Fa Wang, Dong-Wei Zhou, Bin Tang, Tao Hong","doi":"10.3171/2024.5.JNS232533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) in adults are rare benign epithelial tumors, and few contemporary studies have explored outcomes after surgical treatment in elderly patients, especially with regard to endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients aged ≥ 18 years with CP who were treated with EES from 2013 to 2022. The cohort was divided into nonelderly (18-64 years) and elderly (≥ 65 years) groups based on age. Various parameters, including patient and tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, complications, and follow-up, were compared between the two age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 193 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 161 (83.4%) patients in the nonelderly group and 32 (16.6%) patients in the elderly group. Preoperatively, older patients were more likely to have memory impairment (4.3% vs 18.8%, p = 0.010), fatigue or decreased energy (9.3% vs 34.4%, p = 0.001), hypopituitarism (68.7% vs 90.6%, p = 0.012), or hydrocephalus (18% vs 40.6%, p = 0.005), and they were more likely asymptomatic (1.2% vs 9.4%, p = 0.033) and less likely to experience headache (57.8% vs 31.3%, p = 0.006). Patients in the elderly group had a longer symptom duration (median [IQR] 5 [10] months vs 9.5 [13] months, p = 0.001) and higher comorbidity scores (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, gross-total resection was achieved in 145 (90.1%) and 28 (87.5%) patients in the nonelderly and elderly groups, respectively. Older patients were more likely to develop pneumonia (5% vs 21.9%, p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the extent of resection (p = 0.541), pathological subtypes (88.2% vs 75.0% adamantinomatous, p = 0.089), operation time (mean ± SD 307.8 ± 68.3 minutes vs 323.5 ± 86.0 minutes, p = 0.257), estimated blood loss (median [IQR] 300 [200] ml vs 300 [238] ml, p = 0.594), length of stay (median [IQR] 15 [8] days vs 15 [22] days, p = 0.964), perioperative mortality (2.5% vs 3.1%, p > 0.99), or postoperative severe hypothalamic dysfunction (37.9% vs 50.0%, p = 0.237) between the groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that tumor calcification (HR 3.406, 95% CI 1.859-27.233, p = 0.038) and preoperative hydrocephalus (HR 3.688, 95% CI 1.310-10.386, p = 0.013) were independently associated with decreased survival. The median follow-up period in the elderly group was shorter (71 months vs 44 months, p = 0.001), and no recurrence was observed (7.1% vs 0%, p = 0.132).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that EES is a viable treatment option for older CP patients. With appropriate perioperative management, EES does not significantly increase mortality and, in selected populations, is well tolerated by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes after endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngioma in the elderly.\",\"authors\":\"You-Yuan Bao, Lai-Sheng Pan, Yong Cao, Jie Wu, Shen-Hao Xie, Feng Ouyang, Jian Tan, Qi-Fa Wang, Dong-Wei Zhou, Bin Tang, Tao Hong\",\"doi\":\"10.3171/2024.5.JNS232533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) in adults are rare benign epithelial tumors, and few contemporary studies have explored outcomes after surgical treatment in elderly patients, especially with regard to endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients aged ≥ 18 years with CP who were treated with EES from 2013 to 2022. The cohort was divided into nonelderly (18-64 years) and elderly (≥ 65 years) groups based on age. Various parameters, including patient and tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, complications, and follow-up, were compared between the two age groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 193 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 161 (83.4%) patients in the nonelderly group and 32 (16.6%) patients in the elderly group. Preoperatively, older patients were more likely to have memory impairment (4.3% vs 18.8%, p = 0.010), fatigue or decreased energy (9.3% vs 34.4%, p = 0.001), hypopituitarism (68.7% vs 90.6%, p = 0.012), or hydrocephalus (18% vs 40.6%, p = 0.005), and they were more likely asymptomatic (1.2% vs 9.4%, p = 0.033) and less likely to experience headache (57.8% vs 31.3%, p = 0.006). Patients in the elderly group had a longer symptom duration (median [IQR] 5 [10] months vs 9.5 [13] months, p = 0.001) and higher comorbidity scores (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, gross-total resection was achieved in 145 (90.1%) and 28 (87.5%) patients in the nonelderly and elderly groups, respectively. Older patients were more likely to develop pneumonia (5% vs 21.9%, p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the extent of resection (p = 0.541), pathological subtypes (88.2% vs 75.0% adamantinomatous, p = 0.089), operation time (mean ± SD 307.8 ± 68.3 minutes vs 323.5 ± 86.0 minutes, p = 0.257), estimated blood loss (median [IQR] 300 [200] ml vs 300 [238] ml, p = 0.594), length of stay (median [IQR] 15 [8] days vs 15 [22] days, p = 0.964), perioperative mortality (2.5% vs 3.1%, p > 0.99), or postoperative severe hypothalamic dysfunction (37.9% vs 50.0%, p = 0.237) between the groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that tumor calcification (HR 3.406, 95% CI 1.859-27.233, p = 0.038) and preoperative hydrocephalus (HR 3.688, 95% CI 1.310-10.386, p = 0.013) were independently associated with decreased survival. The median follow-up period in the elderly group was shorter (71 months vs 44 months, p = 0.001), and no recurrence was observed (7.1% vs 0%, p = 0.132).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that EES is a viable treatment option for older CP patients. With appropriate perioperative management, EES does not significantly increase mortality and, in selected populations, is well tolerated by patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.JNS232533\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.5.JNS232533","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:成人颅咽管瘤(CPs)是一种罕见的良性上皮性肿瘤,目前很少有研究探讨老年患者手术治疗后的效果,尤其是内窥镜鼻内镜手术(EES)的效果:一项回顾性队列研究的对象是2013年至2022年接受EES治疗的年龄≥18岁的CP患者。队列根据年龄分为非老年组(18-64 岁)和老年组(≥ 65 岁)。比较了两个年龄组的各种参数,包括患者和肿瘤特征、手术效果、并发症和随访情况:共有193名患者符合纳入标准,其中非老年组161人(83.4%),老年组32人(16.6%)。术前,老年患者更容易出现记忆障碍(4.3% vs 18.8%,P = 0.010)、疲劳或体力下降(9.3% vs 34.4%,P = 0.001)、垂体功能减退(68.7% vs 90.6%,p = 0.012)或脑积水(18% vs 40.6%,p = 0.005),他们更可能没有症状(1.2% vs 9.4%,p = 0.033),更不可能出现头痛(57.8% vs 31.3%,p = 0.006)。老年组患者的症状持续时间更长(中位数[IQR] 5 [10] 个月 vs 9.5 [13] 个月,p = 0.001),合并症评分更高(p < 0.001)。术后,非老年组和老年组分别有 145 例(90.1%)和 28 例(87.5%)患者实现了大体全切除。老年患者更容易患肺炎(5% vs 21.9%,P = 0.004)。在切除范围(p = 0.541)、病理亚型(88.2% vs 75.0% 金刚瘤,p = 0.089)、手术时间(平均值±标准值 307.8 ± 68.3 分钟 vs 323.5 ± 86.0 分钟,p = 0.257)、估计失血量(中位数[IQR] 300 [200] ml vs 300 [238] ml,p = 0.594)、住院时间(中位数[IQR] 15 [8] 天 vs 15 [22] 天,p = 0.964)、组间围手术期死亡率(2.5% vs 3.1%,p > 0.99)或术后严重下丘脑功能障碍(37.9% vs 50.0%,p = 0.237)。多变量 Cox 回归分析表明,肿瘤钙化(HR 3.406,95% CI 1.859-27.233,p = 0.038)和术前脑积水(HR 3.688,95% CI 1.310-10.386,p = 0.013)与生存率下降独立相关。老年组的中位随访时间较短(71个月 vs 44个月,p = 0.001),未观察到复发(7.1% vs 0%,p = 0.132):本研究表明,对于老年 CP 患者来说,EES 是一种可行的治疗方案。结论:这项研究表明,EES 是老年 CP 患者的可行治疗方案。通过适当的围手术期管理,EES 不会显著增加死亡率,而且在特定人群中,患者的耐受性良好。
Clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes after endoscopic endonasal surgery for craniopharyngioma in the elderly.
Objective: Craniopharyngiomas (CPs) in adults are rare benign epithelial tumors, and few contemporary studies have explored outcomes after surgical treatment in elderly patients, especially with regard to endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES).
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients aged ≥ 18 years with CP who were treated with EES from 2013 to 2022. The cohort was divided into nonelderly (18-64 years) and elderly (≥ 65 years) groups based on age. Various parameters, including patient and tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, complications, and follow-up, were compared between the two age groups.
Results: A total of 193 patients met the inclusion criteria, with 161 (83.4%) patients in the nonelderly group and 32 (16.6%) patients in the elderly group. Preoperatively, older patients were more likely to have memory impairment (4.3% vs 18.8%, p = 0.010), fatigue or decreased energy (9.3% vs 34.4%, p = 0.001), hypopituitarism (68.7% vs 90.6%, p = 0.012), or hydrocephalus (18% vs 40.6%, p = 0.005), and they were more likely asymptomatic (1.2% vs 9.4%, p = 0.033) and less likely to experience headache (57.8% vs 31.3%, p = 0.006). Patients in the elderly group had a longer symptom duration (median [IQR] 5 [10] months vs 9.5 [13] months, p = 0.001) and higher comorbidity scores (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, gross-total resection was achieved in 145 (90.1%) and 28 (87.5%) patients in the nonelderly and elderly groups, respectively. Older patients were more likely to develop pneumonia (5% vs 21.9%, p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in the extent of resection (p = 0.541), pathological subtypes (88.2% vs 75.0% adamantinomatous, p = 0.089), operation time (mean ± SD 307.8 ± 68.3 minutes vs 323.5 ± 86.0 minutes, p = 0.257), estimated blood loss (median [IQR] 300 [200] ml vs 300 [238] ml, p = 0.594), length of stay (median [IQR] 15 [8] days vs 15 [22] days, p = 0.964), perioperative mortality (2.5% vs 3.1%, p > 0.99), or postoperative severe hypothalamic dysfunction (37.9% vs 50.0%, p = 0.237) between the groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that tumor calcification (HR 3.406, 95% CI 1.859-27.233, p = 0.038) and preoperative hydrocephalus (HR 3.688, 95% CI 1.310-10.386, p = 0.013) were independently associated with decreased survival. The median follow-up period in the elderly group was shorter (71 months vs 44 months, p = 0.001), and no recurrence was observed (7.1% vs 0%, p = 0.132).
Conclusions: This study demonstrates that EES is a viable treatment option for older CP patients. With appropriate perioperative management, EES does not significantly increase mortality and, in selected populations, is well tolerated by patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.