Yavor Bozhkov, Julian Feulner, Michael Buchfelder, Max Kleiss, Sebastian Brandner, Thomas M Kinfe
{"title":"骨膜下引流管对慢性硬膜下血肿的疗效:一项前瞻性随机单中心研究。","authors":"Yavor Bozhkov, Julian Feulner, Michael Buchfelder, Max Kleiss, Sebastian Brandner, Thomas M Kinfe","doi":"10.1055/a-2418-3682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs) are most frequently treated by evacuation via a burr-hole craniostomy procedure. Subperiosteal drains have been introduced as alternatives to subdural ones, but only a few prospective studies have explored their efficacy. Thus, a prospective randomized trial was designed to assess their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The study enrolled patients with newly diagnosed surgically amenable cSDH. These patients were randomized into two groups. The first group underwent cSDH evacuation via a single burr hole craniostomy procedure, followed by placement of a subperiosteal drain; the second group underwent the identical procedure without drain placement. Patient demographics, drain volumes, duration of drainage, cSDH recurrence, and postoperative outcomes were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Eighty-eight patients presenting with cSDH (12 with bilateral cSDHs) from a total of 100 surgical cases were enrolled. Nine patients (1 bilateral) were lost to follow-up. Of all remaining 90 procedures, 37 were carried out with drain placement and the remaining 53 without drain placement. There were five recurrent cases (13.5%) in the drain placement group and 17 (32.1%) in the group without drain placement. This resulted in a statistical significance (odds ratio [OR]: 0.33; <i>p</i> < 0.05) favoring the use of a drain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Subperiosteal drain placement can be used safely and effectively to treat cSDH in conjunction with a burr-hole craniostomy procedure, significantly reducing the rate of recurrence without any additional disadvantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Subperiosteal Drains in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yavor Bozhkov, Julian Feulner, Michael Buchfelder, Max Kleiss, Sebastian Brandner, Thomas M Kinfe\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2418-3682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs) are most frequently treated by evacuation via a burr-hole craniostomy procedure. Subperiosteal drains have been introduced as alternatives to subdural ones, but only a few prospective studies have explored their efficacy. Thus, a prospective randomized trial was designed to assess their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> The study enrolled patients with newly diagnosed surgically amenable cSDH. These patients were randomized into two groups. The first group underwent cSDH evacuation via a single burr hole craniostomy procedure, followed by placement of a subperiosteal drain; the second group underwent the identical procedure without drain placement. Patient demographics, drain volumes, duration of drainage, cSDH recurrence, and postoperative outcomes were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> Eighty-eight patients presenting with cSDH (12 with bilateral cSDHs) from a total of 100 surgical cases were enrolled. Nine patients (1 bilateral) were lost to follow-up. Of all remaining 90 procedures, 37 were carried out with drain placement and the remaining 53 without drain placement. There were five recurrent cases (13.5%) in the drain placement group and 17 (32.1%) in the group without drain placement. This resulted in a statistical significance (odds ratio [OR]: 0.33; <i>p</i> < 0.05) favoring the use of a drain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Subperiosteal drain placement can be used safely and effectively to treat cSDH in conjunction with a burr-hole craniostomy procedure, significantly reducing the rate of recurrence without any additional disadvantages.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2418-3682\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2418-3682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of Subperiosteal Drains in Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Study.
Background: Chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs) are most frequently treated by evacuation via a burr-hole craniostomy procedure. Subperiosteal drains have been introduced as alternatives to subdural ones, but only a few prospective studies have explored their efficacy. Thus, a prospective randomized trial was designed to assess their use.
Methods: The study enrolled patients with newly diagnosed surgically amenable cSDH. These patients were randomized into two groups. The first group underwent cSDH evacuation via a single burr hole craniostomy procedure, followed by placement of a subperiosteal drain; the second group underwent the identical procedure without drain placement. Patient demographics, drain volumes, duration of drainage, cSDH recurrence, and postoperative outcomes were recorded.
Results: Eighty-eight patients presenting with cSDH (12 with bilateral cSDHs) from a total of 100 surgical cases were enrolled. Nine patients (1 bilateral) were lost to follow-up. Of all remaining 90 procedures, 37 were carried out with drain placement and the remaining 53 without drain placement. There were five recurrent cases (13.5%) in the drain placement group and 17 (32.1%) in the group without drain placement. This resulted in a statistical significance (odds ratio [OR]: 0.33; p < 0.05) favoring the use of a drain.
Conclusion: Subperiosteal drain placement can be used safely and effectively to treat cSDH in conjunction with a burr-hole craniostomy procedure, significantly reducing the rate of recurrence without any additional disadvantages.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies.
JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.