硬膜外罗哌卡因与 0.4 μg mL-1 右美托咪定在分娩镇痛中的剂量反应:前瞻性双盲研究。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000039654
Jun Yin, Shen Cao, Jie Lei, Xiao-Yan Wang, Jing-Ping You, Ding-Chao Xu, Xin-De Chen, Wen-Ping Xu
{"title":"硬膜外罗哌卡因与 0.4 μg mL-1 右美托咪定在分娩镇痛中的剂量反应:前瞻性双盲研究。","authors":"Jun Yin, Shen Cao, Jie Lei, Xiao-Yan Wang, Jing-Ping You, Ding-Chao Xu, Xin-De Chen, Wen-Ping Xu","doi":"10.1097/MD.0000000000039654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that the ideal dose of epidural dexmedetomidine is 0.4 μg mL-1 for epidural labor analgesia. However, the appropriate dose of ropivacaine when combined with 0.4 μg mL-1 of dexmedetomidine for epidural labor analgesia is still unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the dose-response of ropivacaine when using 0.4 μg mL-1 of dexmedetomidine as epidural adjuvant for labor analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred of nulliparous singleton pregnant patients were randomized allocated into 1 of 5 groups with epidural ropivacaine concentration of 0.05%, 0.0625%, 0.075%, 0.0875%, and 0.1%. Labor analgesia was initialed with 12 mL of the mixed study solution. Effective analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale <10 mm 30 minutes after the initial epidural bolus. The EC50 and EC95 for epidural ropivacaine was calculated by probit regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three of parturients were involved into the final analysis. Totals of 63.2% (12/19), 73.7% (14/19), 88.9% (16/18), 94.7% (18/19), and 100% (18/18) of parturients in group 0.05, 0.0625, 0.075, 0.0875, and 0.1 received effective epidural labor analgesia. The calculated EC50 and EC95 of epidural ropivacaine were 0.046% (95% CI 0.028-0.054%) and 0.086% (95% CI 0.074-0.137%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under the condition of the study, a bolus of 12 mL ropivacaine 0.086% and dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg mL-1 could afford 95% of nulliparous singleton pregnant patients without suffering labor pain after a test dose of lidocaine 45 mg.</p>","PeriodicalId":18549,"journal":{"name":"Medicine","volume":"103 38","pages":"e39654"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dose-response of epidural ropivacaine with 0.4 μg mL-1 of dexmedetomidine for labor analgesia: A prospective double-blinded study.\",\"authors\":\"Jun Yin, Shen Cao, Jie Lei, Xiao-Yan Wang, Jing-Ping You, Ding-Chao Xu, Xin-De Chen, Wen-Ping Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MD.0000000000039654\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Studies have shown that the ideal dose of epidural dexmedetomidine is 0.4 μg mL-1 for epidural labor analgesia. However, the appropriate dose of ropivacaine when combined with 0.4 μg mL-1 of dexmedetomidine for epidural labor analgesia is still unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the dose-response of ropivacaine when using 0.4 μg mL-1 of dexmedetomidine as epidural adjuvant for labor analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred of nulliparous singleton pregnant patients were randomized allocated into 1 of 5 groups with epidural ropivacaine concentration of 0.05%, 0.0625%, 0.075%, 0.0875%, and 0.1%. Labor analgesia was initialed with 12 mL of the mixed study solution. Effective analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale <10 mm 30 minutes after the initial epidural bolus. The EC50 and EC95 for epidural ropivacaine was calculated by probit regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-three of parturients were involved into the final analysis. Totals of 63.2% (12/19), 73.7% (14/19), 88.9% (16/18), 94.7% (18/19), and 100% (18/18) of parturients in group 0.05, 0.0625, 0.075, 0.0875, and 0.1 received effective epidural labor analgesia. The calculated EC50 and EC95 of epidural ropivacaine were 0.046% (95% CI 0.028-0.054%) and 0.086% (95% CI 0.074-0.137%), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Under the condition of the study, a bolus of 12 mL ropivacaine 0.086% and dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg mL-1 could afford 95% of nulliparous singleton pregnant patients without suffering labor pain after a test dose of lidocaine 45 mg.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18549,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine\",\"volume\":\"103 38\",\"pages\":\"e39654\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11419513/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039654\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:研究表明,硬膜外分娩镇痛时,硬膜外右美托咪定的理想剂量为 0.4 μg mL-1。然而,罗哌卡因与 0.4 μg mL-1 右美托咪定联合用于硬膜外分娩镇痛的合适剂量仍是未知数。因此,我们旨在确定罗哌卡因在使用 0.4 μg mL-1 右美托咪定作为硬膜外辅助分娩镇痛剂时的剂量反应:100名无子宫的单胎孕妇被随机分配到5组中的1组,硬膜外罗哌卡因浓度分别为0.05%、0.0625%、0.075%、0.0875%和0.1%。分娩镇痛开始时使用 12 毫升混合研究溶液。有效镇痛的定义是视觉模拟评分:93名产妇参与了最终分析。在 0.05、0.0625、0.075、0.0875 和 0.1 组中,分别有 63.2%(12/19)、73.7%(14/19)、88.9%(16/18)、94.7%(18/19)和 100% (18/18)的产妇获得了有效的硬膜外分娩镇痛。计算得出的硬膜外罗哌卡因 EC50 和 EC95 分别为 0.046%(95% CI 0.028-0.054%)和 0.086%(95% CI 0.074-0.137%):在本研究的条件下,12 毫升 0.086% 罗哌卡因和 0.4 μg mL-1 右美托咪定的栓剂可使 95% 的无阴道单胎妊娠患者在利多卡因 45 毫克的试验剂量后免受分娩疼痛之苦。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dose-response of epidural ropivacaine with 0.4 μg mL-1 of dexmedetomidine for labor analgesia: A prospective double-blinded study.

Background: Studies have shown that the ideal dose of epidural dexmedetomidine is 0.4 μg mL-1 for epidural labor analgesia. However, the appropriate dose of ropivacaine when combined with 0.4 μg mL-1 of dexmedetomidine for epidural labor analgesia is still unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine the dose-response of ropivacaine when using 0.4 μg mL-1 of dexmedetomidine as epidural adjuvant for labor analgesia.

Methods: One hundred of nulliparous singleton pregnant patients were randomized allocated into 1 of 5 groups with epidural ropivacaine concentration of 0.05%, 0.0625%, 0.075%, 0.0875%, and 0.1%. Labor analgesia was initialed with 12 mL of the mixed study solution. Effective analgesia was defined as a visual analogue scale <10 mm 30 minutes after the initial epidural bolus. The EC50 and EC95 for epidural ropivacaine was calculated by probit regression.

Results: Ninety-three of parturients were involved into the final analysis. Totals of 63.2% (12/19), 73.7% (14/19), 88.9% (16/18), 94.7% (18/19), and 100% (18/18) of parturients in group 0.05, 0.0625, 0.075, 0.0875, and 0.1 received effective epidural labor analgesia. The calculated EC50 and EC95 of epidural ropivacaine were 0.046% (95% CI 0.028-0.054%) and 0.086% (95% CI 0.074-0.137%), respectively.

Conclusions: Under the condition of the study, a bolus of 12 mL ropivacaine 0.086% and dexmedetomidine 0.4 μg mL-1 could afford 95% of nulliparous singleton pregnant patients without suffering labor pain after a test dose of lidocaine 45 mg.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine
Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4342
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medicine is now a fully open access journal, providing authors with a distinctive new service offering continuous publication of original research across a broad spectrum of medical scientific disciplines and sub-specialties. As an open access title, Medicine will continue to provide authors with an established, trusted platform for the publication of their work. To ensure the ongoing quality of Medicine’s content, the peer-review process will only accept content that is scientifically, technically and ethically sound, and in compliance with standard reporting guidelines.
期刊最新文献
Causal association analysis between 731 immune cells and cystitis: A 2-sample, bidirectional Mendelian randomization study. Impact of housing instability on hospital outcomes in alcohol-associated liver disease: A single-center retrospective cohort study. Trajectory changes of clinical empathy ability of Chinese nursing interns: A longitudinal study using latent transition analysis. Traumatic spinal cord injury in Jinan, China: A 10-year hospital-based retrospective observational study of 1134 cases. Causal relationship between inflammatory proteins and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A serum-metabolites-mediated Mendelian randomization analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1