Emergency Operable Traumatic Pulmonary Injury at a Level 1 Trauma Center: A Retrospective Descriptive Study.

Introduction: Despite the use of body armor, emergency operable pulmonary trauma (EOPT) remains a major cause of battlefield morbidity and mortality. While EOPT during military conflicts has some features that distinguish it from EOPT in civilian settings, the 2 occurrences demonstrate overall parallel findings related to presentation, management, and outcome. The goals of the present study were to provide a descriptive analysis of the nature of EOPT and its management at a level 1 trauma center and to determine the associations between EOPT patient demographics and/or patient management and outcome in order to better understand battlefield EOPT.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective, descriptive analysis of EOPT at a level 1 trauma center during a recent 9-year period (2012-2020). The Oregon Health & Science University Trauma Registry was searched, and 106 patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Patients with primary cardiac trauma were excluded. Individual electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain descriptive data, and associations were evaluated for statistical significance.

Results: In-hospital mortality in this cohort was 17.0%. The most common pulmonary injury associated with EOPT was unilateral diaphragmatic laceration (62.3%), and the most common single operation performed for EOPT was a laparotomy (71.7%) often involving diaphragmatic repair. In the remaining instances of EOPT, a thoracotomy (11.3%), a thoracotomy and a laparotomy (10.4%), or another surgery (6.6%) occurred. The primary indication for EOPT surgery was uncontrolled hemorrhage, and one-third of patients received massive transfusion. One-lung ventilation (OLV) was infrequently employed (8.5%). When OLV was used, it was equally likely to involve a single-lumen endotracheal tube (SLETT) with mainstem bronchus insertion, a SLETT with a bronchial blocker, or a double-lumen endotracheal tube. Time from EOPT to operating room arrival was inversely related to in-hospital mortality. Also, both initial in-hospital endotracheal intubation and low injury severity score were strongly associated with survival in the population studied.

Conclusions: The most common indication for EOPT surgery was uncontrolled hemorrhage. The most frequent operation performed for this EOPT cohort was a laparotomy for diaphragmatic repair. A total of 91.5% of EOPT surgery was performed without OLV, an unexpected finding. When OLV occurred, it was equally likely to involve an SLETT with mainstem bronchus insertion, an SLETT with bronchial blocker, or a double-lumen endotracheal tube. The most common indication for OLV was surgical exposure. More extensive injury (expressed as an injury severity score), preadmission endotracheal intubation, and a shorter time from EOPT to operating room arrival were associated with increased odds ratios for mortality. A better understanding of the nature of EOPT at a civilian level 1 trauma center can serve to identify conditions that are associated with more favorable outcomes for EOPT under battlefield conditions and thereby assist in both management decisions and to help prognosticate and triage severely injured patients in that setting.