Laura J L Huisintveld, Barbara C van Munster, Fleur C W Visser, Liesbeth Hempenius
{"title":"[初级保健中的有限认知评估:全科医生转诊到记忆诊所是否总是合适的?]","authors":"Laura J L Huisintveld, Barbara C van Munster, Fleur C W Visser, Liesbeth Hempenius","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether referrals of general practitioners (GPs) to the memory clinic align with the regional and national dementia guidelines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>For this single center retrospective study, data was collected from electronic patient files.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>GP referrals to the memory clinic over a 1-year period were categorized and evaluated according to the regional and national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>310 GP referrals were included with the most common referral motivations: \"Additional somatic or psychiatric factors\" (77; 24,8%) and \"Straightforward dementia diagnosis\" (70; 22,6%). A total of 51,0% of referrals were not in line with regional guidelines: either because of non-compliant referral reasons; or limited cognitive assessment without clinical findings and/or cognitive testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Half of GP referrals to the memory clinic were not in line with the national and regional guidelines. Referrals were often not preceded by clinical findings and/or cognitive testing. Aiming for effective care, cognitive assessments in primary care should be encouraged and with appropriate assistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":18903,"journal":{"name":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","volume":"168 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Limited cognitive assessment in primary care: are GP referrals to the memory clinic always appropriate?]\",\"authors\":\"Laura J L Huisintveld, Barbara C van Munster, Fleur C W Visser, Liesbeth Hempenius\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether referrals of general practitioners (GPs) to the memory clinic align with the regional and national dementia guidelines.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>For this single center retrospective study, data was collected from electronic patient files.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>GP referrals to the memory clinic over a 1-year period were categorized and evaluated according to the regional and national guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>310 GP referrals were included with the most common referral motivations: \\\"Additional somatic or psychiatric factors\\\" (77; 24,8%) and \\\"Straightforward dementia diagnosis\\\" (70; 22,6%). A total of 51,0% of referrals were not in line with regional guidelines: either because of non-compliant referral reasons; or limited cognitive assessment without clinical findings and/or cognitive testing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Half of GP referrals to the memory clinic were not in line with the national and regional guidelines. Referrals were often not preceded by clinical findings and/or cognitive testing. Aiming for effective care, cognitive assessments in primary care should be encouraged and with appropriate assistance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"volume\":\"168 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Limited cognitive assessment in primary care: are GP referrals to the memory clinic always appropriate?]
Objective: To investigate whether referrals of general practitioners (GPs) to the memory clinic align with the regional and national dementia guidelines.
Design: For this single center retrospective study, data was collected from electronic patient files.
Method: GP referrals to the memory clinic over a 1-year period were categorized and evaluated according to the regional and national guidelines.
Results: 310 GP referrals were included with the most common referral motivations: "Additional somatic or psychiatric factors" (77; 24,8%) and "Straightforward dementia diagnosis" (70; 22,6%). A total of 51,0% of referrals were not in line with regional guidelines: either because of non-compliant referral reasons; or limited cognitive assessment without clinical findings and/or cognitive testing.
Conclusion: Half of GP referrals to the memory clinic were not in line with the national and regional guidelines. Referrals were often not preceded by clinical findings and/or cognitive testing. Aiming for effective care, cognitive assessments in primary care should be encouraged and with appropriate assistance.
期刊介绍:
Het NTVG staat bekend als hét wetenschappelijke algemene medische tijdschrift. De lange historie en de degelijkheid maken het tijdschrift tot een bolwerk van medische wetenschap in druk. Ook door de goede leesbaarheid draagt het tijdschrift bij aan de voortdurende dialoog over de geneeskunde.