MDS-UPDRS 居家远程评估第三部分:多文化患者指南的开发与验证。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Movement Disorders Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-23 DOI:10.1002/mdc3.14203
Michelle H S Tosin, Alvaro Sanchez-Ferro, Ruey-Meei Wu, Beatriz G R B de Oliveira, Marco Antonio A Leite, Pablo Rábano Suárez, Christopher G Goetz, Pablo Martinez-Martin, Glenn T Stebbins, Tiago A Mestre
{"title":"MDS-UPDRS 居家远程评估第三部分:多文化患者指南的开发与验证。","authors":"Michelle H S Tosin, Alvaro Sanchez-Ferro, Ruey-Meei Wu, Beatriz G R B de Oliveira, Marco Antonio A Leite, Pablo Rábano Suárez, Christopher G Goetz, Pablo Martinez-Martin, Glenn T Stebbins, Tiago A Mestre","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.14203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The shift toward virtualized care introduces challenges in assessing the motor severity of Parkinson's disease (PD). The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III, the most used rating scale in PD, lacks validation for synchronous remote administration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our goal was to validate the usability of a patient guide to allow an accurate video-based MDS-UDPRS part III remote examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multi-stage mixed methods study that included a team consensus for the concept of the guide, cognitive pretesting, and usability (system usability scale, [SUS]) testing in five sites (total n = 25 participants) with distinct linguistic and cultural contexts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A multi-language (English, Portuguese, Spanish, and traditional Chinese) largely pictograph guide of the MDS-UPDRS part III remote examination reached benchmark for usability (SUS score ≥68) in 25 participants who completed the synchronous remote assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MDS-UDPRS part III remote examination guide can be used remotely accurately, and facilitate clinical practice and research in a paradigm of telemedicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":"1576-1581"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In-Home Remote Assessment of the MDS-UPDRS Part III: Multi-Cultural Development and Validation of a Guide for Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Michelle H S Tosin, Alvaro Sanchez-Ferro, Ruey-Meei Wu, Beatriz G R B de Oliveira, Marco Antonio A Leite, Pablo Rábano Suárez, Christopher G Goetz, Pablo Martinez-Martin, Glenn T Stebbins, Tiago A Mestre\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mdc3.14203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The shift toward virtualized care introduces challenges in assessing the motor severity of Parkinson's disease (PD). The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III, the most used rating scale in PD, lacks validation for synchronous remote administration.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Our goal was to validate the usability of a patient guide to allow an accurate video-based MDS-UDPRS part III remote examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multi-stage mixed methods study that included a team consensus for the concept of the guide, cognitive pretesting, and usability (system usability scale, [SUS]) testing in five sites (total n = 25 participants) with distinct linguistic and cultural contexts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A multi-language (English, Portuguese, Spanish, and traditional Chinese) largely pictograph guide of the MDS-UPDRS part III remote examination reached benchmark for usability (SUS score ≥68) in 25 participants who completed the synchronous remote assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MDS-UDPRS part III remote examination guide can be used remotely accurately, and facilitate clinical practice and research in a paradigm of telemedicine.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1576-1581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648028/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14203\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.14203","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:向虚拟化护理的转变为评估帕金森病(PD)的运动严重程度带来了挑战。运动障碍协会统一帕金森病评定量表(MDS-UPDRS)第三部分是帕金森病最常用的评定量表,但缺乏同步远程管理的验证:我们的目标是验证患者指南的可用性,使基于视频的 MDS-UDPRS 第三部分远程检查准确无误:我们进行了一项多阶段混合方法研究,其中包括团队对指南概念的共识、认知预测试以及在五个具有不同语言和文化背景的地点(总人数 = 25 名参与者)进行的可用性(系统可用性量表[SUS])测试:结果:在完成同步远程评估的 25 名参与者中,MDS-UPDRS 第三部分远程检查的多语言(英语、葡萄牙语、西班牙语和繁体中文)象形图指南达到了可用性基准(SUS 分数≥68):结论:MDS-UPDRS 第三部分远程检查指南可在远程准确使用,有助于远程医疗模式下的临床实践和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In-Home Remote Assessment of the MDS-UPDRS Part III: Multi-Cultural Development and Validation of a Guide for Patients.

Background: The shift toward virtualized care introduces challenges in assessing the motor severity of Parkinson's disease (PD). The Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) part III, the most used rating scale in PD, lacks validation for synchronous remote administration.

Objective: Our goal was to validate the usability of a patient guide to allow an accurate video-based MDS-UDPRS part III remote examination.

Methods: We conducted a multi-stage mixed methods study that included a team consensus for the concept of the guide, cognitive pretesting, and usability (system usability scale, [SUS]) testing in five sites (total n = 25 participants) with distinct linguistic and cultural contexts.

Results: A multi-language (English, Portuguese, Spanish, and traditional Chinese) largely pictograph guide of the MDS-UPDRS part III remote examination reached benchmark for usability (SUS score ≥68) in 25 participants who completed the synchronous remote assessment.

Conclusions: The MDS-UDPRS part III remote examination guide can be used remotely accurately, and facilitate clinical practice and research in a paradigm of telemedicine.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
期刊最新文献
Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the TWSTRS-Delphi Motor Severity Scale for Cervical Dystonia. Breathe, Eat, Talk: Three Essential Ingredients to Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Movement Disorders. Paroxysmal Kinesigenic Dyskinesia and Progressive Ataxia-Spasticity Syndrome Caused by a Biallelic Variant in KCNJ10. How Do Oral Medications, Botulinum Toxin Use, and Treatment Burden Change after Deep Brain Stimulation for Dystonia? Deep Brain Stimulation after Subthalamic Focused Ultrasound for Parkinson's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1