PHOMS(乳头周围高反射卵圆形肿块样结构)伴有视盘升高,是否仍是诊断难题?

IF 13.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.09.007
Rim Maalej, Mohamed Bouassida, Hervé Picard, Catherine Vignal Clermont, Rabih Hage
{"title":"PHOMS(乳头周围高反射卵圆形肿块样结构)伴有视盘升高,是否仍是诊断难题?","authors":"Rim Maalej, Mohamed Bouassida, Hervé Picard, Catherine Vignal Clermont, Rabih Hage","doi":"10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.09.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify clinical characteristics that would help make or rule out the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in patients referred for papilledema (PE) with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All patients referred for PE excluding PE with Frisén grade ≥ 3, optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy, and compressive optic neuropathy. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 = isolated PHOMS; group 2 = PHOMS associated with IIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the location of PHOMS based on OCT-enhanced depth imaging (EDI) and calculated their volume.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), ganglion cell complex, and volume of PHOMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 patients (308 eyes) were included. Patients' mean age was 29 years, with a female predominance (78%). Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures were associated with these etiologies: IIH (38.3%), isolated (35.7%), posterior uveitis (11%), optic disc drusen (ODD) (10%), and tilted optic disc (5%). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 83.1% of cases. More than half of the MRI scans were interpreted as consistent with IIH. However, only 39.7% of these patients had confirmed IIH with 44.5% sensitivity and 55.5% specificity. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures were overrepresented in the nasal region (95.5%).The location of PHOMS in the superior or inferior quadrant was significantly associated with IIH or ODD, whereas their presence in the temporal or nasal sector was strongly associated with isolated lesions. The mean and median volume of PHOMS were 1.66 μm<sup>3</sup> and 1.50 μm<sup>3</sup>, respectively. There was a significant difference in PHOMS volume, with a higher volume in patients with IIH (P = 0.0037). Follow-up of these patients at 3 and 6 months demonstrated no significant changes in visual function, as per visual field mean deviation, visual acuity measurements, and ganglion cell layer. Mean pRNFL showed a decrease of -4.225 μm at 3 months and -6.489 μm at 6 months when compared with the initial measurement independent of the etiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Isolated PHOMS should be considered as a distinct entity. In asymptomatic patients, PHOMS should be carefully studied. Nasal or temporal location, small volume, and stable aspect over the course of weeks or months are suggestive of this entity. This strategy would considerably reduce the impact on patients' anxiety and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":19533,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-like Structures with an Elevated Optic Disc Still a Diagnosis Dilemma?\",\"authors\":\"Rim Maalej, Mohamed Bouassida, Hervé Picard, Catherine Vignal Clermont, Rabih Hage\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.09.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify clinical characteristics that would help make or rule out the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in patients referred for papilledema (PE) with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>All patients referred for PE excluding PE with Frisén grade ≥ 3, optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy, and compressive optic neuropathy. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 = isolated PHOMS; group 2 = PHOMS associated with IIH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the location of PHOMS based on OCT-enhanced depth imaging (EDI) and calculated their volume.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), ganglion cell complex, and volume of PHOMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 patients (308 eyes) were included. Patients' mean age was 29 years, with a female predominance (78%). Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures were associated with these etiologies: IIH (38.3%), isolated (35.7%), posterior uveitis (11%), optic disc drusen (ODD) (10%), and tilted optic disc (5%). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 83.1% of cases. More than half of the MRI scans were interpreted as consistent with IIH. However, only 39.7% of these patients had confirmed IIH with 44.5% sensitivity and 55.5% specificity. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures were overrepresented in the nasal region (95.5%).The location of PHOMS in the superior or inferior quadrant was significantly associated with IIH or ODD, whereas their presence in the temporal or nasal sector was strongly associated with isolated lesions. The mean and median volume of PHOMS were 1.66 μm<sup>3</sup> and 1.50 μm<sup>3</sup>, respectively. There was a significant difference in PHOMS volume, with a higher volume in patients with IIH (P = 0.0037). Follow-up of these patients at 3 and 6 months demonstrated no significant changes in visual function, as per visual field mean deviation, visual acuity measurements, and ganglion cell layer. Mean pRNFL showed a decrease of -4.225 μm at 3 months and -6.489 μm at 6 months when compared with the initial measurement independent of the etiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Isolated PHOMS should be considered as a distinct entity. In asymptomatic patients, PHOMS should be carefully studied. Nasal or temporal location, small volume, and stable aspect over the course of weeks or months are suggestive of this entity. This strategy would considerably reduce the impact on patients' anxiety and morbidity.</p><p><strong>Financial disclosure(s): </strong>The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.09.007\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.09.007","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在因乳头水肿(PE)伴毛细血管周围高反射性卵圆形肿块样结构(PHOMS)而转诊的患者中,找出有助于确诊或排除特发性颅内高压(IIH)的临床特征:所有PE转诊患者,不包括Frisén分级≥3级的PE、视神经炎、缺血性视神经病变、压迫性视神经病变。患者分为两组方法:根据 OCT-EDI 分析 PHOMS 的位置并计算其体积:结果:共纳入 154 名患者(308 只眼),平均年龄 29 岁,女性占多数(78%)。PHOMS 与以下病因有关:IIH(38.3%)、孤立性(35.7%)、后葡萄膜炎(11%)、视盘色素沉着(ODD)(10%)和视盘倾斜(5%)。83.1%的病例接受了磁共振成像检查。超过一半的核磁共振成像被解释为与 IIH 一致。然而,其中只有 39.7% 的患者确诊为 IIH,灵敏度为 44.5%,敏感度为 55.5%。PHOMS位于上象限和/或下象限与IIH或视黄斑明显相关,而位于颞部或鼻部则与孤立病变密切相关。PHOMS的平均体积和中位体积分别为1.66 μm3和1.50 μm3。PHOMS体积存在明显差异,IIH患者的体积更大(P=0.0037)。对这些患者进行3个月和6个月的随访显示,视野平均偏差、视力测量和神经节细胞层(GCL)等视功能均无明显变化:结论:孤立的PHOMS应被视为一个独特的实体。对于无症状的患者,应仔细研究 PHOMS。鼻腔或颞部位置、体积小、数周或数月内情况稳定,这些都是该病症的特征。这一策略将大大减少对患者焦虑和发病率的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are Peripapillary Hyperreflective Ovoid Mass-like Structures with an Elevated Optic Disc Still a Diagnosis Dilemma?

Purpose: To identify clinical characteristics that would help make or rule out the diagnosis of idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) in patients referred for papilledema (PE) with peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures (PHOMS).

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Participants: All patients referred for PE excluding PE with Frisén grade ≥ 3, optic neuritis, ischemic optic neuropathy, and compressive optic neuropathy. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 = isolated PHOMS; group 2 = PHOMS associated with IIH.

Methods: We analyzed the location of PHOMS based on OCT-enhanced depth imaging (EDI) and calculated their volume.

Main outcome measures: Peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL), ganglion cell complex, and volume of PHOMS.

Results: A total of 154 patients (308 eyes) were included. Patients' mean age was 29 years, with a female predominance (78%). Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures were associated with these etiologies: IIH (38.3%), isolated (35.7%), posterior uveitis (11%), optic disc drusen (ODD) (10%), and tilted optic disc (5%). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in 83.1% of cases. More than half of the MRI scans were interpreted as consistent with IIH. However, only 39.7% of these patients had confirmed IIH with 44.5% sensitivity and 55.5% specificity. Peripapillary hyperreflective ovoid mass-like structures were overrepresented in the nasal region (95.5%).The location of PHOMS in the superior or inferior quadrant was significantly associated with IIH or ODD, whereas their presence in the temporal or nasal sector was strongly associated with isolated lesions. The mean and median volume of PHOMS were 1.66 μm3 and 1.50 μm3, respectively. There was a significant difference in PHOMS volume, with a higher volume in patients with IIH (P = 0.0037). Follow-up of these patients at 3 and 6 months demonstrated no significant changes in visual function, as per visual field mean deviation, visual acuity measurements, and ganglion cell layer. Mean pRNFL showed a decrease of -4.225 μm at 3 months and -6.489 μm at 6 months when compared with the initial measurement independent of the etiology.

Conclusions: Isolated PHOMS should be considered as a distinct entity. In asymptomatic patients, PHOMS should be carefully studied. Nasal or temporal location, small volume, and stable aspect over the course of weeks or months are suggestive of this entity. This strategy would considerably reduce the impact on patients' anxiety and morbidity.

Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmology
Ophthalmology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: The journal Ophthalmology, from the American Academy of Ophthalmology, contributes to society by publishing research in clinical and basic science related to vision.It upholds excellence through unbiased peer-review, fostering innovation, promoting discovery, and encouraging lifelong learning.
期刊最新文献
Corrigendum. Special Commentary: Cerebral/Cortical Visual Impairment Working Definition: A Report from the National Institutes of Health CVI Workshop. What Is Cerebral/Cortical Visual Impairment and Why Do We Need a New Definition? Cavernous Hemangioma of the Retina and Brain. A Child with Posterior Ectopic Cilia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1