使用 T 型钢板(使用远端螺钉)和不使用远端螺钉治疗 Barton 脊柱骨折的比较。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.12669/pjms.40.8.8799
Sajjad Haider, Muhammad Zarak Awais, Eman Salik, Muhammad Tahir Iqbal
{"title":"使用 T 型钢板(使用远端螺钉)和不使用远端螺钉治疗 Barton 脊柱骨折的比较。","authors":"Sajjad Haider, Muhammad Zarak Awais, Eman Salik, Muhammad Tahir Iqbal","doi":"10.12669/pjms.40.8.8799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the functional and radiological outcomes of treatment of volar Barton's fractures using T plate with and without distal end screws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized control trial was conducted at the department of Orthopedics, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan from December 2021 to May 2022. Total 60 patients (30 in each group) were randomly allocated to either group A (T-Plate with distal end screws) or B (T-Plate without distal end screws). Patients were followed up on day-0, day-14, day-28 and day-90. Assessments of patients were done by Green O'Brien Score for pain, Modified Warden Score for callus formation on radiographs at 12-weeks of follow-up and Stewart Score for displacement of fracture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 90<sup>th</sup> day, significant difference was seen in Green O'Brien Score (Excellent score: Group-A: 80% vs. Group-B: 90%, p=0.278) while Stewart scores remained comparable (Excellent Score: Group-A: 93.33% vs. Group-B: 96.67%, p=0.221) between treatment groups. Fracture healing assessed with Modified Warden score for score 4 did not show significant difference between both groups at 90<sup>th</sup> day. i.e. (Group-A: 96.67% vs. Group-B: 96.67%). However, callus formation assessed with Modified Warden score for score 3 showed significant differences between groups at 90<sup>th</sup> day. i.e. (Group-A: 53.33% vs. Group-B: 86.67%, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both treatment approaches appear to yield comparable outcomes in terms of clinical assessment, Stewart scores, and fracture healing, with a potential advantage for T-plate without distal end screw in callus formation at the 90th day.Trial registration: IRCT20221231056999N1.</p>","PeriodicalId":19958,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11395339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of treatment of volar Barton's fracture with T plate using distal end screws and without distal end screws.\",\"authors\":\"Sajjad Haider, Muhammad Zarak Awais, Eman Salik, Muhammad Tahir Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.12669/pjms.40.8.8799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the functional and radiological outcomes of treatment of volar Barton's fractures using T plate with and without distal end screws.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized control trial was conducted at the department of Orthopedics, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan from December 2021 to May 2022. Total 60 patients (30 in each group) were randomly allocated to either group A (T-Plate with distal end screws) or B (T-Plate without distal end screws). Patients were followed up on day-0, day-14, day-28 and day-90. Assessments of patients were done by Green O'Brien Score for pain, Modified Warden Score for callus formation on radiographs at 12-weeks of follow-up and Stewart Score for displacement of fracture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 90<sup>th</sup> day, significant difference was seen in Green O'Brien Score (Excellent score: Group-A: 80% vs. Group-B: 90%, p=0.278) while Stewart scores remained comparable (Excellent Score: Group-A: 93.33% vs. Group-B: 96.67%, p=0.221) between treatment groups. Fracture healing assessed with Modified Warden score for score 4 did not show significant difference between both groups at 90<sup>th</sup> day. i.e. (Group-A: 96.67% vs. Group-B: 96.67%). However, callus formation assessed with Modified Warden score for score 3 showed significant differences between groups at 90<sup>th</sup> day. i.e. (Group-A: 53.33% vs. Group-B: 86.67%, p=0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both treatment approaches appear to yield comparable outcomes in terms of clinical assessment, Stewart scores, and fracture healing, with a potential advantage for T-plate without distal end screw in callus formation at the 90th day.Trial registration: IRCT20221231056999N1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11395339/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.8.8799\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.8.8799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较使用T型钢板(带远端螺钉)和不带远端螺钉治疗巴顿外侧骨折的功能和放射学结果:这项随机对照试验于 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 5 月在巴基斯坦拉合尔梅奥医院骨科进行。共有 60 名患者(每组 30 人)被随机分配到 A 组(带远端螺钉的 T 型钢板)或 B 组(不带远端螺钉的 T 型钢板)。分别在第 0 天、第 14 天、第 28 天和第 90 天对患者进行随访。通过格林-奥布莱恩评分(Green O'Brien Score)评估患者的疼痛情况,通过改良沃顿评分(Modified Warden Score)评估随访12周时X光片上胼胝的形成情况,通过斯图尔特评分(Stewart Score)评估骨折的移位情况:第 90 天时,治疗组之间的格林-奥布莱恩评分有明显差异(优秀评分:A 组:80% vs. B 组:90%,P=0.278),而斯图尔特评分仍具有可比性(优秀评分:A 组:93.33% vs. B 组:96.67%,P=0.221)。在第 90 天时,用改良 Warden 评分评估骨折愈合情况(第 4 分),两组间无显著差异,即(A 组:96.67% 对 B 组:96.67%)。然而,在第 90 天时,用改良 Warden 评分 3 评估的胼胝形成情况在两组间有显著差异,即(A 组:53.33% vs. B 组:86.67%,P=0.001):结论:两种治疗方法在临床评估、Stewart评分和骨折愈合方面的效果相当,但在第90天形成胼胝方面,无远端螺钉的T型钢板可能更具优势:IRCT20221231056999N1.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of treatment of volar Barton's fracture with T plate using distal end screws and without distal end screws.

Objective: To compare the functional and radiological outcomes of treatment of volar Barton's fractures using T plate with and without distal end screws.

Methods: This randomized control trial was conducted at the department of Orthopedics, Mayo Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan from December 2021 to May 2022. Total 60 patients (30 in each group) were randomly allocated to either group A (T-Plate with distal end screws) or B (T-Plate without distal end screws). Patients were followed up on day-0, day-14, day-28 and day-90. Assessments of patients were done by Green O'Brien Score for pain, Modified Warden Score for callus formation on radiographs at 12-weeks of follow-up and Stewart Score for displacement of fracture.

Results: At 90th day, significant difference was seen in Green O'Brien Score (Excellent score: Group-A: 80% vs. Group-B: 90%, p=0.278) while Stewart scores remained comparable (Excellent Score: Group-A: 93.33% vs. Group-B: 96.67%, p=0.221) between treatment groups. Fracture healing assessed with Modified Warden score for score 4 did not show significant difference between both groups at 90th day. i.e. (Group-A: 96.67% vs. Group-B: 96.67%). However, callus formation assessed with Modified Warden score for score 3 showed significant differences between groups at 90th day. i.e. (Group-A: 53.33% vs. Group-B: 86.67%, p=0.001).

Conclusion: Both treatment approaches appear to yield comparable outcomes in terms of clinical assessment, Stewart scores, and fracture healing, with a potential advantage for T-plate without distal end screw in callus formation at the 90th day.Trial registration: IRCT20221231056999N1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
363
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: It is a peer reviewed medical journal published regularly since 1984. It was previously known as quarterly "SPECIALIST" till December 31st 1999. It publishes original research articles, review articles, current practices, short communications & case reports. It attracts manuscripts not only from within Pakistan but also from over fifty countries from abroad. Copies of PJMS are sent to all the import medical libraries all over Pakistan and overseas particularly in South East Asia and Asia Pacific besides WHO EMRO Region countries. Eminent members of the medical profession at home and abroad regularly contribute their write-ups, manuscripts in our publications. We pursue an independent editorial policy, which allows an opportunity to the healthcare professionals to express their views without any fear or favour. That is why many opinion makers among the medical and pharmaceutical profession use this publication to communicate their viewpoint.
期刊最新文献
Enhancing the antibacterial and surface hardness of glass ionomer cement modified with Salvadora persica and Chlorhexidine: An in vitro study. Genetic Variants in Vitamin-D Metabolism Genes (rs1155563, rs12785878 and rs10500804) among Females with Type-2 Diabetes Mellitus in Saudi Arabia. Genotypes analysis and antifungal susceptibility of Candida albicans strains isolated from women with vaginal candidiasis in Jordan using PCR targeting 25SrDNA and ALT repeat sequences of the RPS. Impact of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy on survival outcomes in patients with unilateral breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of Flood on Breastfeeding Practices at Flood Relief Camps of Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1