物理治疗师临床教学能力框架的验证:混合方法。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzae138
Amanda Sharp, Catherine Bilyeu, Carissa Wengrovius, Katherine Myers
{"title":"物理治疗师临床教学能力框架的验证:混合方法。","authors":"Amanda Sharp, Catherine Bilyeu, Carissa Wengrovius, Katherine Myers","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzae138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A competency framework for clinical teaching in physical therapy was established in a recent study. Validation of competency frameworks requires multiple steps, including consideration of end-user perceptions of value and utility. The purpose of this study was to further validate the clinical teaching competency framework by gathering input specifically from clinical education faculty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach to seek input from clinical instructors (CI) and site coordinators of clinical education (SCCE) from diverse practice areas and geographic regions. A survey invited participation from active clinical education faculty, and survey respondents were invited to participate in a focus group. Two focus groups were held via Zoom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey responses from those holding roles of CI (59.3%), SCCE (11.3%), and CI/SCCE (29.4%) indicated support for the competency framework, including perceived value to their role (93.1%) and enhancement of quality of clinical education (94.1%). Concern regarding ease of utilization of the framework was indicated by 24% of respondents. There were no statistically significant differences in responses based on role or credentials. The focus groups resulted in an overarching theme of Collective Impact, with 4 subthemes: Assessment, CI development, Implementation, and Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical education faculty perceive value and utility in the Clinical Teaching Competency Framework. Implementation of the framework into practice should be collaborative and consistent across academic and clinical education programs.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>This study moves the profession one step closer to use of a competency framework specifically targeted at clinical teaching in physical therapy. Clinical education faculty will be primary users of a competency framework and buy-in from this user group is key to implementation. Continued efforts to validate this framework contribute to addressing the need for CI development and support in delivering excellence in clinical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a Clinical Teaching Competency Framework for Physical Therapists: A Mixed-Methods Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Amanda Sharp, Catherine Bilyeu, Carissa Wengrovius, Katherine Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ptj/pzae138\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A competency framework for clinical teaching in physical therapy was established in a recent study. Validation of competency frameworks requires multiple steps, including consideration of end-user perceptions of value and utility. The purpose of this study was to further validate the clinical teaching competency framework by gathering input specifically from clinical education faculty.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach to seek input from clinical instructors (CI) and site coordinators of clinical education (SCCE) from diverse practice areas and geographic regions. A survey invited participation from active clinical education faculty, and survey respondents were invited to participate in a focus group. Two focus groups were held via Zoom.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey responses from those holding roles of CI (59.3%), SCCE (11.3%), and CI/SCCE (29.4%) indicated support for the competency framework, including perceived value to their role (93.1%) and enhancement of quality of clinical education (94.1%). Concern regarding ease of utilization of the framework was indicated by 24% of respondents. There were no statistically significant differences in responses based on role or credentials. The focus groups resulted in an overarching theme of Collective Impact, with 4 subthemes: Assessment, CI development, Implementation, and Guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clinical education faculty perceive value and utility in the Clinical Teaching Competency Framework. Implementation of the framework into practice should be collaborative and consistent across academic and clinical education programs.</p><p><strong>Impact statement: </strong>This study moves the profession one step closer to use of a competency framework specifically targeted at clinical teaching in physical therapy. Clinical education faculty will be primary users of a competency framework and buy-in from this user group is key to implementation. Continued efforts to validate this framework contribute to addressing the need for CI development and support in delivering excellence in clinical education.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae138\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae138","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近的一项研究建立了物理治疗临床教学的能力框架。验证能力框架需要多个步骤,包括考虑最终用户对价值和效用的看法。本研究旨在通过收集临床教育工作者的意见,进一步验证临床教学能力框架:本研究采用了一种解释性顺序混合方法,以征求来自不同实践领域和地理区域的临床导师(CI)和临床教育站点协调员(SCCE)的意见。调查邀请在职临床教育教师参与,并邀请调查对象参加焦点小组。两个焦点小组通过 Zoom 进行了讨论:担任 CI(59.3%)、SCCE(11.3%)和 CI/SCCE (29.4%)职务的人员对调查的答复表明,他们支持能力框架,包括认为该框架对他们的职务有价值(93.1%)和提高临床教育质量(94.1%)。有 24% 的受访者对能力框架的易用性表示担忧。不同角色或资历的受访者在回答问题时没有明显的统计学差异。焦点小组得出了 "集体影响 "这一总主题,以及 4 个分主题:结论:临床教育教师认为临床教学能力框架具有价值和实用性。该框架在实践中的实施应在学术和临床教育项目中进行合作并保持一致:这项研究使物理治疗专业离使用专门针对临床教学的能力框架更近了一步。临床教育教师将是能力框架的主要用户,这一用户群体的认同是实施的关键。继续努力验证该框架有助于满足临床教育中对 CI 发展和支持的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of a Clinical Teaching Competency Framework for Physical Therapists: A Mixed-Methods Approach.

Objective: A competency framework for clinical teaching in physical therapy was established in a recent study. Validation of competency frameworks requires multiple steps, including consideration of end-user perceptions of value and utility. The purpose of this study was to further validate the clinical teaching competency framework by gathering input specifically from clinical education faculty.

Methods: This study used an explanatory sequential mixed methods approach to seek input from clinical instructors (CI) and site coordinators of clinical education (SCCE) from diverse practice areas and geographic regions. A survey invited participation from active clinical education faculty, and survey respondents were invited to participate in a focus group. Two focus groups were held via Zoom.

Results: Survey responses from those holding roles of CI (59.3%), SCCE (11.3%), and CI/SCCE (29.4%) indicated support for the competency framework, including perceived value to their role (93.1%) and enhancement of quality of clinical education (94.1%). Concern regarding ease of utilization of the framework was indicated by 24% of respondents. There were no statistically significant differences in responses based on role or credentials. The focus groups resulted in an overarching theme of Collective Impact, with 4 subthemes: Assessment, CI development, Implementation, and Guidelines.

Conclusion: Clinical education faculty perceive value and utility in the Clinical Teaching Competency Framework. Implementation of the framework into practice should be collaborative and consistent across academic and clinical education programs.

Impact statement: This study moves the profession one step closer to use of a competency framework specifically targeted at clinical teaching in physical therapy. Clinical education faculty will be primary users of a competency framework and buy-in from this user group is key to implementation. Continued efforts to validate this framework contribute to addressing the need for CI development and support in delivering excellence in clinical education.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
期刊最新文献
Outpatient Physical Therapy Attendance by Older Adults After Emergency Department Discharge was a Predictor for Lower 30-Day Revisits-But Demographic Factors Affected Attendance. Diabetic Foot Ulcer beyond Wound Closure: Clinical Practice Guideline. Optimizing the Accuracy and Precision of the Minimal Detectable Change Statistic: Secondary Analysis of Test-Retest Data from the NIH Toolbox Study. Chronic Underrepresentation of Females and Women in Stroke Research Adversely Impacts Clinical Care. Online Graded Motor Imagery Is Effective in Women Diagnosed with Pelvic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1