打破障碍:埃及教职员工成功发表科研成果的导航之路。

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121241274710
Abdelaziz Hendy, Sahar M Soliman, Samira Salman, Fadia Ahmed Abdelkader Reshia, Salwa Sayed, Ahmed Hendy, Khalid Al-Mugheed, Amany Anwar Saeed Alabdullah, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem, Ahmed Zaher
{"title":"打破障碍:埃及教职员工成功发表科研成果的导航之路。","authors":"Abdelaziz Hendy, Sahar M Soliman, Samira Salman, Fadia Ahmed Abdelkader Reshia, Salwa Sayed, Ahmed Hendy, Khalid Al-Mugheed, Amany Anwar Saeed Alabdullah, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem, Ahmed Zaher","doi":"10.1177/20503121241274710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the realm of academia, the publication of scientific research is not merely an act of dissemination; it serves as a pivotal milestone that signifies the culmination of rigorous investigation, critical analysis, and intellectual contribution.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the challenges and barriers encountered by faculty members in the process of publishing their work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized a descriptive cross-sectional design and was conducted from 1 March to 1 May 2022. A convenience sample of 358 faculty members from eight universities in Egypt, representing a diverse range of faculties. These faculties comprised five practical disciplines, namely, Nursing, Medicine, Science, Pharmacy, and Engineering, as well as three theoretical faculties including Al-Alsun (Languages), Arts, and Commerce. The universities involved in the study included Ain Shams, Cairo, Mansoura, Benha, Assiut, 6th of October, British University in Egypt (BUE), among others. Data were collected through an online questionnaire that included staff characteristics and barriers to scientific research and publishing. Hypothesis testing was conducted using appropriate statistical analysis methods (e.g., Chi-square test) to assess the relationships between faculty members' characteristics and barriers to publishing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The faculty staff in our study reported the highest barriers to publishing scientific research in the domains of the reviewing process (74%), institutional support (67%), and scientific publishing process (60.9%). Conversely, the lowest barriers were found in the domains of frustration after rejection (55.1%), scientific writing barriers (46.1%), and loss of passion and causation of publishing barriers (41.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results highlighted the need for increased support and resources to overcome these barriers and foster a positive culture of research and publishing in Egyptian universities.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11409289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking barriers: Navigating the path to successful scientific research publication among faculty members in Egypt.\",\"authors\":\"Abdelaziz Hendy, Sahar M Soliman, Samira Salman, Fadia Ahmed Abdelkader Reshia, Salwa Sayed, Ahmed Hendy, Khalid Al-Mugheed, Amany Anwar Saeed Alabdullah, Sally Mohammed Farghaly Abdelaliem, Ahmed Zaher\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20503121241274710\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the realm of academia, the publication of scientific research is not merely an act of dissemination; it serves as a pivotal milestone that signifies the culmination of rigorous investigation, critical analysis, and intellectual contribution.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To examine the challenges and barriers encountered by faculty members in the process of publishing their work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study utilized a descriptive cross-sectional design and was conducted from 1 March to 1 May 2022. A convenience sample of 358 faculty members from eight universities in Egypt, representing a diverse range of faculties. These faculties comprised five practical disciplines, namely, Nursing, Medicine, Science, Pharmacy, and Engineering, as well as three theoretical faculties including Al-Alsun (Languages), Arts, and Commerce. The universities involved in the study included Ain Shams, Cairo, Mansoura, Benha, Assiut, 6th of October, British University in Egypt (BUE), among others. Data were collected through an online questionnaire that included staff characteristics and barriers to scientific research and publishing. Hypothesis testing was conducted using appropriate statistical analysis methods (e.g., Chi-square test) to assess the relationships between faculty members' characteristics and barriers to publishing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The faculty staff in our study reported the highest barriers to publishing scientific research in the domains of the reviewing process (74%), institutional support (67%), and scientific publishing process (60.9%). Conversely, the lowest barriers were found in the domains of frustration after rejection (55.1%), scientific writing barriers (46.1%), and loss of passion and causation of publishing barriers (41.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results highlighted the need for increased support and resources to overcome these barriers and foster a positive culture of research and publishing in Egyptian universities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21398,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SAGE Open Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11409289/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SAGE Open Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241274710\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241274710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在学术领域,科研成果的发表不仅仅是一种传播行为,它还是一个关键的里程碑,标志着严谨调查、批判性分析和智力贡献的顶峰:研究采用描述性横断面设计,于 2022 年 3 月 1 日至 5 月 1 日进行。方便抽样调查了来自埃及八所大学的 358 名教职员工,他们代表了不同的院系。这些院系包括五个实用学科,即护理、医学、理学、药学和工程学,以及三个理论院系,包括 Al-Alsun(语言)、艺术和商业。参与研究的大学包括艾因夏姆斯大学、开罗大学、曼苏拉大学、本哈大学、阿苏特大学、十月六日大学、英国驻埃及大学(BUE)等。数据是通过在线问卷收集的,其中包括工作人员的特点以及科学研究和出版的障碍。使用适当的统计分析方法(如卡方检验)进行了假设检验,以评估教职员工特征与发表论文障碍之间的关系:在我们的研究中,教职员工在评审过程(74%)、机构支持(67%)和科学出版过程(60.9%)方面报告了发表科研成果的最高障碍。相反,在被拒绝后的挫败感(55.1%)、科学写作障碍(46.1%)以及失去激情和发表障碍的因果关系(41.3%)等领域,教职员工遇到的障碍最少:研究结果表明,埃及大学需要更多的支持和资源来克服这些障碍,并培养积极的研究和出版文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Breaking barriers: Navigating the path to successful scientific research publication among faculty members in Egypt.

Background: In the realm of academia, the publication of scientific research is not merely an act of dissemination; it serves as a pivotal milestone that signifies the culmination of rigorous investigation, critical analysis, and intellectual contribution.

Aim: To examine the challenges and barriers encountered by faculty members in the process of publishing their work.

Methods: The study utilized a descriptive cross-sectional design and was conducted from 1 March to 1 May 2022. A convenience sample of 358 faculty members from eight universities in Egypt, representing a diverse range of faculties. These faculties comprised five practical disciplines, namely, Nursing, Medicine, Science, Pharmacy, and Engineering, as well as three theoretical faculties including Al-Alsun (Languages), Arts, and Commerce. The universities involved in the study included Ain Shams, Cairo, Mansoura, Benha, Assiut, 6th of October, British University in Egypt (BUE), among others. Data were collected through an online questionnaire that included staff characteristics and barriers to scientific research and publishing. Hypothesis testing was conducted using appropriate statistical analysis methods (e.g., Chi-square test) to assess the relationships between faculty members' characteristics and barriers to publishing.

Results: The faculty staff in our study reported the highest barriers to publishing scientific research in the domains of the reviewing process (74%), institutional support (67%), and scientific publishing process (60.9%). Conversely, the lowest barriers were found in the domains of frustration after rejection (55.1%), scientific writing barriers (46.1%), and loss of passion and causation of publishing barriers (41.3%).

Conclusions: The results highlighted the need for increased support and resources to overcome these barriers and foster a positive culture of research and publishing in Egyptian universities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of a combination of dyslipidemia and hypertension on the glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study. Enhancing job satisfaction measurement tool in healthcare settings: Insights from a University Hospital in Vietnam. Epidemiological assessment of diabetes mellitus in children of Ukraine during the last 20 years (2002-2021) of peacetime. Software-driven chronic disease management: Algorithm design and implementation in a community-based blood pressure control pilot. TRIB3 as a biomarker of gastric cancer cell sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents running title: A protective role of TRIB3 on chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1