重新审视胸腰椎前外侧延伸入路的腹壁 "发病率"。

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spine deformity Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00971-3
Alekos A Theologis, Andrew P Collins, Kanwar Parhar, Munish C Gupta
{"title":"重新审视胸腰椎前外侧延伸入路的腹壁 \"发病率\"。","authors":"Alekos A Theologis, Andrew P Collins, Kanwar Parhar, Munish C Gupta","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00971-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess patients' perceptions of their abdominal wall following extensile anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine for adult spinal deformity (ASD) using validated questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults who underwent anterior-posterior thoracolumbar spinal operations to the pelvis for ASD in which the anterior fusion was performed through an extensile anterolateral approach were reviewed. Three questionnaires were administered at least 1 year following surgery and included The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Survey (AHS-QC), The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), and The Anterior Abdominal Incision Questionnaire (AAIQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients (80.4% female, median age 65 years) were included. Average follow-up was 2.8 ± 1.7 years. Average number of anterior fusion levels was 3.5 ± 1.4. Patients achieved high satisfaction rates from surgery (74.5%). AAIQ responses included postoperative pain (33.3%), bulging (41.7%), and limitations in daily activities (18.8%) with only 15.7% experienced moderate-severe pain related to their incisions and only 6.3% seeking treatment for their scars. Post-operatively, 63.2% had a neutral or improved self-image of their torso and trunk, while only 10.2% stating it was much worse. Patients' overall opinion of their scar compared to their normal skin was very positive [average 2.75 ± 2.93 (10 = worst possible scar)]. Favorable scores were also reported for color difference, stiffness, change in thickness, and irregularity in their abdominal scar compared to normal skin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following extensile anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine for ASD, the majority of patients reported mild pain, mild functional limitations, good cosmesis, and high satisfaction rates with their anterior incisions based on validated questionnaires.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting abdominal wall \\\"morbidity\\\" of the extensile anterolateral approach to the thoracolumbar spine.\",\"authors\":\"Alekos A Theologis, Andrew P Collins, Kanwar Parhar, Munish C Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-024-00971-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess patients' perceptions of their abdominal wall following extensile anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine for adult spinal deformity (ASD) using validated questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults who underwent anterior-posterior thoracolumbar spinal operations to the pelvis for ASD in which the anterior fusion was performed through an extensile anterolateral approach were reviewed. Three questionnaires were administered at least 1 year following surgery and included The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Survey (AHS-QC), The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), and The Anterior Abdominal Incision Questionnaire (AAIQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients (80.4% female, median age 65 years) were included. Average follow-up was 2.8 ± 1.7 years. Average number of anterior fusion levels was 3.5 ± 1.4. Patients achieved high satisfaction rates from surgery (74.5%). AAIQ responses included postoperative pain (33.3%), bulging (41.7%), and limitations in daily activities (18.8%) with only 15.7% experienced moderate-severe pain related to their incisions and only 6.3% seeking treatment for their scars. Post-operatively, 63.2% had a neutral or improved self-image of their torso and trunk, while only 10.2% stating it was much worse. Patients' overall opinion of their scar compared to their normal skin was very positive [average 2.75 ± 2.93 (10 = worst possible scar)]. Favorable scores were also reported for color difference, stiffness, change in thickness, and irregularity in their abdominal scar compared to normal skin.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following extensile anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine for ASD, the majority of patients reported mild pain, mild functional limitations, good cosmesis, and high satisfaction rates with their anterior incisions based on validated questionnaires.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00971-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00971-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用经过验证的调查问卷,评估胸腰椎前外侧延伸入路治疗成人脊柱畸形(ASD)后患者对腹壁的看法:方法: 对因脊柱畸形(ASD)而接受胸腰椎前-后路骨盆手术的成人进行了回顾性研究,在这些手术中,前路融合是通过外展前外侧入路进行的。在术后至少一年进行了三次问卷调查,包括腹部核心健康质量合作调查(AHS-QC)、患者疤痕评估量表(PSAS)和腹部前切口问卷(AAIQ):共纳入 51 名患者(80.4% 为女性,中位年龄为 65 岁)。平均随访时间为 2.8 ± 1.7 年。前路融合的平均层数为 3.5 ± 1.4。患者对手术的满意度很高(74.5%)。AAIQ反应包括术后疼痛(33.3%)、隆起(41.7%)和日常活动受限(18.8%),只有15.7%的患者切口疼痛达到中度-重度,只有6.3%的患者寻求疤痕治疗。术后,63.2%的患者对躯干和躯干的自我形象持中性或改善态度,只有10.2%的患者表示躯干和躯干的自我形象大不如前。与正常皮肤相比,患者对其疤痕的总体评价非常正面[平均 2.75 ± 2.93(10 = 最糟糕的疤痕)]。与正常皮肤相比,患者对腹部疤痕的颜色差异、僵硬程度、厚度变化和不规则程度也给予了好评:根据有效的问卷调查,大多数患者在胸腰椎前外侧伸展入路治疗 ASD 后,疼痛轻微,功能受限程度轻微,外观良好,对前部切口的满意度较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Revisiting abdominal wall "morbidity" of the extensile anterolateral approach to the thoracolumbar spine.

Purpose: To assess patients' perceptions of their abdominal wall following extensile anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine for adult spinal deformity (ASD) using validated questionnaires.

Methods: Adults who underwent anterior-posterior thoracolumbar spinal operations to the pelvis for ASD in which the anterior fusion was performed through an extensile anterolateral approach were reviewed. Three questionnaires were administered at least 1 year following surgery and included The Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative Survey (AHS-QC), The Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS), and The Anterior Abdominal Incision Questionnaire (AAIQ).

Results: Fifty-one patients (80.4% female, median age 65 years) were included. Average follow-up was 2.8 ± 1.7 years. Average number of anterior fusion levels was 3.5 ± 1.4. Patients achieved high satisfaction rates from surgery (74.5%). AAIQ responses included postoperative pain (33.3%), bulging (41.7%), and limitations in daily activities (18.8%) with only 15.7% experienced moderate-severe pain related to their incisions and only 6.3% seeking treatment for their scars. Post-operatively, 63.2% had a neutral or improved self-image of their torso and trunk, while only 10.2% stating it was much worse. Patients' overall opinion of their scar compared to their normal skin was very positive [average 2.75 ± 2.93 (10 = worst possible scar)]. Favorable scores were also reported for color difference, stiffness, change in thickness, and irregularity in their abdominal scar compared to normal skin.

Conclusions: Following extensile anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine for ASD, the majority of patients reported mild pain, mild functional limitations, good cosmesis, and high satisfaction rates with their anterior incisions based on validated questionnaires.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
期刊最新文献
Human spinal height growth: a description of normal spine growth patterns and adult spine height prediction from a longitudinal cohort. Making wrong site surgery a "never event" in spinal deformity surgery by use of a "landmark vertebra" to eliminate variability in identifying a target vertebral level. Magnetically controlled growing rods increase 3D true spine length in idiopathic early onset scoliosis patients: results from a multicenter study. Factors contributing to severe scoliosis after open chest surgery for congenital heart disease: a case-control analysis. Zones where reduced implant density leads to correction loss after scoliosis surgery for Lenke 1A adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a multicenter study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1