青春期前对物质的熟悉程度对后续使用的影响:青少年大脑认知发展样本中潜在类别的风险纵向分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Substance Use & Misuse Pub Date : 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1080/10826084.2024.2403109
Andrew Moore, Ben Lewis, Hugh Farrior, Jesse Hinckley, Sara Jo Nixon, Devika Bhatia
{"title":"青春期前对物质的熟悉程度对后续使用的影响:青少年大脑认知发展样本中潜在类别的风险纵向分析。","authors":"Andrew Moore, Ben Lewis, Hugh Farrior, Jesse Hinckley, Sara Jo Nixon, Devika Bhatia","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2403109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting substance use in adolescence is a difficult yet important task in developing effective prevention. We aim to extend previous findings on the linear associations between familiarity with (knowledge of) substances in childhood and subsequent substance use in adolescence through a latent class analysis (LCA) to create risk profiles based on substance familiarity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using the ABCD Study<sup>®</sup> sample, we conducted an LCA using 18 binary substance familiarity variables (<i>n</i> = 11,694 substance-naïve youth). Complementary analyses investigated the relationship between LCA groups and (1) longitudinal use, (2) use initiation, and (3) early use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal LCA resulted in a four-class solution: Naïve, Common, Uncommon, and Rare, with each group increasing in both the number and rarity of known substances. Analysis 1 revealed an increased risk in use over time among both the Uncommon and Rare groups (ORs = 2.08 and 5.55, respectively, <i>p</i>'<i>s</i> < 0.001) compared to the Common group. Analysis 2 observed a decreased risk for initiation between the Naïve and Common groups (OR = 0.61, <i>p</i> = 0.009); however, the Uncommon and Rare groups were at an increased risk compared to the Common group (ORs = 2.08 and 3.42, respectively, <i>p</i>'<i>s</i> < 0.001). Analysis 3 found an increased risk of early use between the Common and Uncommon groups (OR = 1.92, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with a similar trend between the Common and Rare groups (OR = 1.90, <i>p</i> = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results highlight distinct risk profiles for adolescent substance use based on substance familiarity in middle childhood. Current work could be applied as an early screening tool for clinicians to identify those at risk for adolescent substance use.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Pre-Adolescent Substance Familiarity on Subsequent Use: Longitudinal Analysis of Risk by Latent Classes in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Sample.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Moore, Ben Lewis, Hugh Farrior, Jesse Hinckley, Sara Jo Nixon, Devika Bhatia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826084.2024.2403109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting substance use in adolescence is a difficult yet important task in developing effective prevention. We aim to extend previous findings on the linear associations between familiarity with (knowledge of) substances in childhood and subsequent substance use in adolescence through a latent class analysis (LCA) to create risk profiles based on substance familiarity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Using the ABCD Study<sup>®</sup> sample, we conducted an LCA using 18 binary substance familiarity variables (<i>n</i> = 11,694 substance-naïve youth). Complementary analyses investigated the relationship between LCA groups and (1) longitudinal use, (2) use initiation, and (3) early use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal LCA resulted in a four-class solution: Naïve, Common, Uncommon, and Rare, with each group increasing in both the number and rarity of known substances. Analysis 1 revealed an increased risk in use over time among both the Uncommon and Rare groups (ORs = 2.08 and 5.55, respectively, <i>p</i>'<i>s</i> < 0.001) compared to the Common group. Analysis 2 observed a decreased risk for initiation between the Naïve and Common groups (OR = 0.61, <i>p</i> = 0.009); however, the Uncommon and Rare groups were at an increased risk compared to the Common group (ORs = 2.08 and 3.42, respectively, <i>p</i>'<i>s</i> < 0.001). Analysis 3 found an increased risk of early use between the Common and Uncommon groups (OR = 1.92, <i>p</i> < 0.001) with a similar trend between the Common and Rare groups (OR = 1.90, <i>p</i> = 0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results highlight distinct risk profiles for adolescent substance use based on substance familiarity in middle childhood. Current work could be applied as an early screening tool for clinicians to identify those at risk for adolescent substance use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2403109\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2403109","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预测青少年时期的药物使用情况是制定有效预防措施的一项艰巨而又重要的任务。我们的目的是通过潜类分析(LCA),扩展之前关于童年时期对物质的熟悉程度(对物质的了解程度)与随后青春期物质使用之间线性关系的研究结果,从而根据对物质的熟悉程度建立风险特征:我们利用 ABCD 研究®样本,使用 18 个二元物质熟悉程度变量(n = 11,694 名未接触过药物的青少年)进行了 LCA 分析。补充分析调查了 LCA 组别与(1)纵向使用、(2)开始使用和(3)早期使用之间的关系:结果:最佳 LCA 得出了四类解决方案:结果:最佳 LCA 得出了四类解决方案:新手、常见、不常见和罕见,每类已知物质的数量和罕见程度都在增加。分析 1 显示,随着时间的推移,不常见组和罕见组的使用风险都在增加(ORs 分别为 2.08 和 5.55,P's P = 0.009);然而,与常见组相比,不常见组和罕见组的风险更高(ORs 分别为 2.08 和 3.42,P's P = 0.06):这些结果凸显了青少年使用药物的不同风险特征,其基础是他们在童年中期对药物的熟悉程度。目前的研究成果可作为早期筛查工具,供临床医生识别青少年药物使用风险人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Pre-Adolescent Substance Familiarity on Subsequent Use: Longitudinal Analysis of Risk by Latent Classes in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Sample.

Background: Predicting substance use in adolescence is a difficult yet important task in developing effective prevention. We aim to extend previous findings on the linear associations between familiarity with (knowledge of) substances in childhood and subsequent substance use in adolescence through a latent class analysis (LCA) to create risk profiles based on substance familiarity.

Method: Using the ABCD Study® sample, we conducted an LCA using 18 binary substance familiarity variables (n = 11,694 substance-naïve youth). Complementary analyses investigated the relationship between LCA groups and (1) longitudinal use, (2) use initiation, and (3) early use.

Results: The optimal LCA resulted in a four-class solution: Naïve, Common, Uncommon, and Rare, with each group increasing in both the number and rarity of known substances. Analysis 1 revealed an increased risk in use over time among both the Uncommon and Rare groups (ORs = 2.08 and 5.55, respectively, p's < 0.001) compared to the Common group. Analysis 2 observed a decreased risk for initiation between the Naïve and Common groups (OR = 0.61, p = 0.009); however, the Uncommon and Rare groups were at an increased risk compared to the Common group (ORs = 2.08 and 3.42, respectively, p's < 0.001). Analysis 3 found an increased risk of early use between the Common and Uncommon groups (OR = 1.92, p < 0.001) with a similar trend between the Common and Rare groups (OR = 1.90, p = 0.06).

Conclusion: These results highlight distinct risk profiles for adolescent substance use based on substance familiarity in middle childhood. Current work could be applied as an early screening tool for clinicians to identify those at risk for adolescent substance use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
期刊最新文献
Patterns of Alcohol, Cannabis, and E-Cigarette Use/Co-Use and Mental Health Among U.S. College Students. Associations of Minority Stressors, Alcohol Use Disorder, Resilience, and HIV Testing Self-Efficacy Among Community-Based Black Men Who Have Sex with Men in a Southern U.S. City: A Causal Mediation and Moderation Analysis. Differentiating the Contribution of Context-Specific Social Influences on Underage Youth's Alcohol Consumption. Flavored Tobacco User Characteristics in U.S. young Adults: Wave 5 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. Use of cannabis for mental health in the Canadian territories: a cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1