在中等收入国家通过视频通话使用 WHODAS 2.0 对中风后的残疾和健康状况进行远程评估的验证。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1080/10749357.2024.2403811
Ariadne Cardoso da Silva, Léia Cordeiro de Oliveira, Heyriane Martins Dos Santos, Bibiana Caldeira Monteiro, Gabriela Santos Pereira, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Soraia Micaela Silva
{"title":"在中等收入国家通过视频通话使用 WHODAS 2.0 对中风后的残疾和健康状况进行远程评估的验证。","authors":"Ariadne Cardoso da Silva, Léia Cordeiro de Oliveira, Heyriane Martins Dos Santos, Bibiana Caldeira Monteiro, Gabriela Santos Pereira, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Soraia Micaela Silva","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2024.2403811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The validity, reliability, and accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for face-to-face assessment in the stroke population are well established. However, the validity and reliability of WHODAS 2.0 through tele-assessment remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, agreement, internal consistency, criterion and discriminant validity of WHODAS 2.0 when administered through video calls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal methodological study included fifty individuals with chronic stroke. Both in-person and video call assessments were conducted, and their sequence was randomized. The reliability was determined using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC2,1). Measurement errors were assessed using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α. Criterion validity was determined by conducting Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis between in-person and video call assessments. Discriminant validity was examined using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve to distinguish disability levels, with the Modified Rankin Scale as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants had a mean age of 56.10 ± 10.8 years, with an equal distribution of genders. Adequate reliability was observed between the two methods (ICC2,1 = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.79-0.93; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and internal consistency was also adequate (Cronbach's α = 0.88). The criterion validity revealed a strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.78; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Discriminant validity demonstrated satisfactory accuracy in distinguishing disability levels via video call (AUC = 0.67; <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study offers evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the WHODAS 2.0 assessment through video call. Teleassessment using WHODAS 2.0 proves suitable for individuals who have had a stroke, enabling remote evaluation and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of tele-assessment of disability and health after stroke using WHODAS 2.0 through video call in a middle-income country.\",\"authors\":\"Ariadne Cardoso da Silva, Léia Cordeiro de Oliveira, Heyriane Martins Dos Santos, Bibiana Caldeira Monteiro, Gabriela Santos Pereira, Shamyr Sulyvan de Castro, Soraia Micaela Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2024.2403811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The validity, reliability, and accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for face-to-face assessment in the stroke population are well established. However, the validity and reliability of WHODAS 2.0 through tele-assessment remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, agreement, internal consistency, criterion and discriminant validity of WHODAS 2.0 when administered through video calls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal methodological study included fifty individuals with chronic stroke. Both in-person and video call assessments were conducted, and their sequence was randomized. The reliability was determined using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC2,1). Measurement errors were assessed using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α. Criterion validity was determined by conducting Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis between in-person and video call assessments. Discriminant validity was examined using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve to distinguish disability levels, with the Modified Rankin Scale as the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants had a mean age of 56.10 ± 10.8 years, with an equal distribution of genders. Adequate reliability was observed between the two methods (ICC2,1 = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.79-0.93; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and internal consistency was also adequate (Cronbach's α = 0.88). The criterion validity revealed a strong correlation (<i>r</i> = 0.78; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Discriminant validity demonstrated satisfactory accuracy in distinguishing disability levels via video call (AUC = 0.67; <i>p</i> = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study offers evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the WHODAS 2.0 assessment through video call. Teleassessment using WHODAS 2.0 proves suitable for individuals who have had a stroke, enabling remote evaluation and care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2403811\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2024.2403811","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:世界卫生组织残疾评估表 2.0(WHODAS 2.0)在卒中人群中进行面对面评估的有效性、可靠性和准确性已得到公认。然而,WHODAS 2.0 通过远程评估的有效性和可靠性仍不确定。目的:评估通过视频通话进行评估时 WHODAS 2.0 的可靠性、一致性、内部一致性、标准效度和判别效度:方法: 一项纵向方法学研究纳入了 50 名慢性中风患者。进行了面对面和视频通话两种评估,其顺序是随机的。信度采用类内相关系数(ICC2,1)确定。测量误差采用测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(SDC)进行评估。内部一致性采用 Cronbach's α 进行评估。标准效度是通过对面对面评估和视频通话评估进行皮尔逊相关系数分析来确定的。以改良朗肯量表为参考标准,使用接收者操作特征曲线(ROC)来区分残疾程度,从而检验判别效度:参与者的平均年龄为(56.10 ± 10.8)岁,性别分布均衡。两种方法之间具有足够的可靠性(ICC2,1 = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.79-0.93; p r = 0.78; p p = 0.04):本研究为通过视频通话进行WHODAS 2.0评估的有效性和可靠性提供了证据。使用 WHODAS 2.0 进行远程评估适用于中风患者,可实现远程评估和护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of tele-assessment of disability and health after stroke using WHODAS 2.0 through video call in a middle-income country.

Background: The validity, reliability, and accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for face-to-face assessment in the stroke population are well established. However, the validity and reliability of WHODAS 2.0 through tele-assessment remain uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability, agreement, internal consistency, criterion and discriminant validity of WHODAS 2.0 when administered through video calls.

Methods: A longitudinal methodological study included fifty individuals with chronic stroke. Both in-person and video call assessments were conducted, and their sequence was randomized. The reliability was determined using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC2,1). Measurement errors were assessed using the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's α. Criterion validity was determined by conducting Pearson's correlation coefficient analysis between in-person and video call assessments. Discriminant validity was examined using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve to distinguish disability levels, with the Modified Rankin Scale as the reference standard.

Results: The participants had a mean age of 56.10 ± 10.8 years, with an equal distribution of genders. Adequate reliability was observed between the two methods (ICC2,1 = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.79-0.93; p < 0.001), and internal consistency was also adequate (Cronbach's α = 0.88). The criterion validity revealed a strong correlation (r = 0.78; p < 0.001). Discriminant validity demonstrated satisfactory accuracy in distinguishing disability levels via video call (AUC = 0.67; p = 0.04).

Discussion: This study offers evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the WHODAS 2.0 assessment through video call. Teleassessment using WHODAS 2.0 proves suitable for individuals who have had a stroke, enabling remote evaluation and care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
期刊最新文献
Lateropulsion resolution and outcomes up to one year post-stroke: a prospective, longitudinal cohort study. The effects of kinesiophobia, fatigue, and quality of life on physical activity in patients with stroke. Cardiorespiratory fitness, physical activity, and fatigue three months after first-ever ischemic stroke. Turkish cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the stroke activity scale in individuals with Hemiparesis. Defining tibial anterior muscle morphology in first-ever chronic stroke patients using three-dimensional freehand ultrasound.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1