高龄(≥80 岁)新诊断前列腺癌患者的管理注意事项和治疗效果:一家泌尿外科中心 10 年间的实际数据。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q4 ANDROLOGY Translational andrology and urology Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.21037/tau-24-134
Xiong Xiao, Jun-Xin Wang, Yong Wang, Yong Xu, Ran-Lu Liu, Shan-Qi Guo, Xing-Kang Jiang
{"title":"高龄(≥80 岁)新诊断前列腺癌患者的管理注意事项和治疗效果:一家泌尿外科中心 10 年间的实际数据。","authors":"Xiong Xiao, Jun-Xin Wang, Yong Wang, Yong Xu, Ran-Lu Liu, Shan-Qi Guo, Xing-Kang Jiang","doi":"10.21037/tau-24-134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is ongoing debate regarding prostate cancer (PCa) screening in advanced age males, leading to treatment decisions often based on tumor staging and life expectancy. A critical gap in clinical evidence and tailored guidelines for the advanced age with PCa persists. This study aims to compare survival outcomes of various treatment approaches in this demographic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a large urological center for advanced age patients suspected of having PCa between 2012 and 2022. We collected clinical and pathological characteristics and evaluated treatment modalities, including palliative therapy and definitive therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was implemented to reduce bias between treatment modalities. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 4,333 suspected patients, 376 individuals aged 80 years and older underwent prostate biopsy. The overall detection rate of PCa was 78.7%, with a high prevalence of high-grade tumors [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥2]. Most patients (86.5%) received palliative therapy, while 13.5% underwent definitive therapy. Patients in the definitive therapy group had lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, lower tumor stage, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), longer life expectancy, and a higher Geriatric 8 (G8) score compared to the palliative therapy group. The median OS for the entire cohort was 72.0 months, with 70.0 months for palliative therapy and 96.0 months for definitive therapy. Multivariable analyses identified lymphatic and bone metastasis, as well as definitive therapy, as independent prognostic factors for PFS, CSS, and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced age patients, although a small group, have distinct characteristics, including higher PSA levels, positive biopsy rates, and pathological grading and staging. In medically fit elderly patients, especially those with localized PCa and a life expectancy of ≥5 years, definitive therapy could improve survival outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23270,"journal":{"name":"Translational andrology and urology","volume":"13 8","pages":"1506-1516"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399059/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management considerations and treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed prostate cancer in advanced age patients (≥80 years): real-world data from a single urological center over a 10-year period.\",\"authors\":\"Xiong Xiao, Jun-Xin Wang, Yong Wang, Yong Xu, Ran-Lu Liu, Shan-Qi Guo, Xing-Kang Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tau-24-134\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is ongoing debate regarding prostate cancer (PCa) screening in advanced age males, leading to treatment decisions often based on tumor staging and life expectancy. A critical gap in clinical evidence and tailored guidelines for the advanced age with PCa persists. This study aims to compare survival outcomes of various treatment approaches in this demographic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from a large urological center for advanced age patients suspected of having PCa between 2012 and 2022. We collected clinical and pathological characteristics and evaluated treatment modalities, including palliative therapy and definitive therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was implemented to reduce bias between treatment modalities. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 4,333 suspected patients, 376 individuals aged 80 years and older underwent prostate biopsy. The overall detection rate of PCa was 78.7%, with a high prevalence of high-grade tumors [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥2]. Most patients (86.5%) received palliative therapy, while 13.5% underwent definitive therapy. Patients in the definitive therapy group had lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, lower tumor stage, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), longer life expectancy, and a higher Geriatric 8 (G8) score compared to the palliative therapy group. The median OS for the entire cohort was 72.0 months, with 70.0 months for palliative therapy and 96.0 months for definitive therapy. Multivariable analyses identified lymphatic and bone metastasis, as well as definitive therapy, as independent prognostic factors for PFS, CSS, and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Advanced age patients, although a small group, have distinct characteristics, including higher PSA levels, positive biopsy rates, and pathological grading and staging. In medically fit elderly patients, especially those with localized PCa and a life expectancy of ≥5 years, definitive therapy could improve survival outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"1506-1516\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11399059/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational andrology and urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-134\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANDROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational andrology and urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tau-24-134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于高龄男性前列腺癌(PCa)筛查的争论一直存在,导致治疗决定往往基于肿瘤分期和预期寿命。针对高龄前列腺癌患者的临床证据和定制指南仍存在严重不足。本研究旨在比较各种治疗方法在这一人群中的生存结果:我们分析了一家大型泌尿外科中心在 2012 年至 2022 年间收治的疑似 PCa 高龄患者的数据。我们收集了临床和病理特征,并评估了治疗方式,包括姑息治疗和明确治疗。我们采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)分析来减少治疗方式之间的偏差。对无进展生存期(PFS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)和总生存期(OS)进行了卡普兰-梅耶(Kaplan-Meier)和多变量考克斯比例危险回归分析:在 4333 名疑似患者中,376 名 80 岁及以上的患者接受了前列腺活检。PCa 的总检出率为 78.7%,其中高级别肿瘤[国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)≥2 级]的发病率较高。大多数患者(86.5%)接受了姑息治疗,13.5%接受了根治治疗。与姑息治疗组相比,确定性治疗组患者的前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值较低,肿瘤分期和夏尔森综合指数(CCI)较低,预期寿命较长,老年医学8(G8)评分较高。整个队列的中位OS为72.0个月,其中姑息治疗组为70.0个月,确定性治疗组为96.0个月。多变量分析发现,淋巴和骨转移以及确定性治疗是影响PFS、CSS和OS的独立预后因素:高龄患者虽然是一个小群体,但具有明显的特征,包括较高的 PSA 水平、活检阳性率以及病理分级和分期。对于身体健康的老年患者,尤其是患有局部PCa且预期寿命≥5年的患者,确定性治疗可改善生存预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Management considerations and treatment outcomes for newly diagnosed prostate cancer in advanced age patients (≥80 years): real-world data from a single urological center over a 10-year period.

Background: There is ongoing debate regarding prostate cancer (PCa) screening in advanced age males, leading to treatment decisions often based on tumor staging and life expectancy. A critical gap in clinical evidence and tailored guidelines for the advanced age with PCa persists. This study aims to compare survival outcomes of various treatment approaches in this demographic.

Methods: We analyzed data from a large urological center for advanced age patients suspected of having PCa between 2012 and 2022. We collected clinical and pathological characteristics and evaluated treatment modalities, including palliative therapy and definitive therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was implemented to reduce bias between treatment modalities. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were conducted to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS).

Results: Out of 4,333 suspected patients, 376 individuals aged 80 years and older underwent prostate biopsy. The overall detection rate of PCa was 78.7%, with a high prevalence of high-grade tumors [International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥2]. Most patients (86.5%) received palliative therapy, while 13.5% underwent definitive therapy. Patients in the definitive therapy group had lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, lower tumor stage, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), longer life expectancy, and a higher Geriatric 8 (G8) score compared to the palliative therapy group. The median OS for the entire cohort was 72.0 months, with 70.0 months for palliative therapy and 96.0 months for definitive therapy. Multivariable analyses identified lymphatic and bone metastasis, as well as definitive therapy, as independent prognostic factors for PFS, CSS, and OS.

Conclusions: Advanced age patients, although a small group, have distinct characteristics, including higher PSA levels, positive biopsy rates, and pathological grading and staging. In medically fit elderly patients, especially those with localized PCa and a life expectancy of ≥5 years, definitive therapy could improve survival outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: ranslational Andrology and Urology (Print ISSN 2223-4683; Online ISSN 2223-4691; Transl Androl Urol; TAU) is an open access, peer-reviewed, bi-monthly journal (quarterly published from Mar.2012 - Dec. 2014). The main focus of the journal is to describe new findings in the field of translational research of Andrology and Urology, provides current and practical information on basic research and clinical investigations of Andrology and Urology. Specific areas of interest include, but not limited to, molecular study, pathology, biology and technical advances related to andrology and urology. Topics cover range from evaluation, prevention, diagnosis, therapy, prognosis, rehabilitation and future challenges to urology and andrology. Contributions pertinent to urology and andrology are also included from related fields such as public health, basic sciences, education, sociology, and nursing.
期刊最新文献
Acquired buried penis: an observational study characterizing the variability in procedural codes reported during surgery. Build your own all-virtual multidisciplinary kidney stone clinic. Comparison of different processed products of Allium tuberosum Rottler for the treatment of mice asthenozoospermia. Cuproptosis-related signature predicts prognosis and indicates tumor immune infiltration in bladder cancer. Efficacy of iodized oil in emergency ultraselective arterial embolization for fatal massive hemorrhage due to renal angiomyolipoma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1