黑人高危人群对肺癌筛查的认识和信念:一种定性方法。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Translational lung cancer research Pub Date : 2024-08-31 Epub Date: 2024-08-12 DOI:10.21037/tlcr-24-269
Abdi T Gudina, Charles Kamen, Lindsey J Mattick, Francisco Cartujano-Barrera, Michelle C Janelsins, Deborah Ossip, M Patricia Rivera, Kevin Fiscella, Ana-Paula Cupertino
{"title":"黑人高危人群对肺癌筛查的认识和信念:一种定性方法。","authors":"Abdi T Gudina, Charles Kamen, Lindsey J Mattick, Francisco Cartujano-Barrera, Michelle C Janelsins, Deborah Ossip, M Patricia Rivera, Kevin Fiscella, Ana-Paula Cupertino","doi":"10.21037/tlcr-24-269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its efficacy in reducing lung cancer (LC)-specific mortality by 20%, screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in eligible groups remains low (5-16%). Black individuals are more commonly affected by LC than other racial/ethnic groups in the United States (U.S.) but less likely to undergo LC screening (LCS). Our study aimed to explore the knowledge and beliefs of Black individuals at high risk regarding LCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Black individuals (n=17) who met the 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) LCS eligibility criteria were recruited in upstate New York. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio recorded, and transcribed to explore knowledge and beliefs that could influence the uptake of LCS. A qualitative thematic analysis method was used to identify and analyze themes within the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified principal themes about LC and LCS. Although most participants reported that smoking was the major risk factor for LC, some participants placed more emphasis on other factors as the major risk factors for LC and de-emphasized the role of smoking. Most participants were not aware that screening for LC existed. Several barriers and facilitators for LCS were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Awareness about LCS among Black individuals is low. Addressing barriers may help increase LCS rates among Black individuals, ultimately reducing their LC mortality. The findings from our study have important implications in designing more effective interventions involving community health workers and healthcare clinicians to increase LCS uptake among Black individuals at high risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":23271,"journal":{"name":"Translational lung cancer research","volume":"13 8","pages":"1877-1887"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384478/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowledge and beliefs about lung cancer screening among Black individuals at high risk: a qualitative approach.\",\"authors\":\"Abdi T Gudina, Charles Kamen, Lindsey J Mattick, Francisco Cartujano-Barrera, Michelle C Janelsins, Deborah Ossip, M Patricia Rivera, Kevin Fiscella, Ana-Paula Cupertino\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/tlcr-24-269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite its efficacy in reducing lung cancer (LC)-specific mortality by 20%, screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in eligible groups remains low (5-16%). Black individuals are more commonly affected by LC than other racial/ethnic groups in the United States (U.S.) but less likely to undergo LC screening (LCS). Our study aimed to explore the knowledge and beliefs of Black individuals at high risk regarding LCS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Black individuals (n=17) who met the 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) LCS eligibility criteria were recruited in upstate New York. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio recorded, and transcribed to explore knowledge and beliefs that could influence the uptake of LCS. A qualitative thematic analysis method was used to identify and analyze themes within the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified principal themes about LC and LCS. Although most participants reported that smoking was the major risk factor for LC, some participants placed more emphasis on other factors as the major risk factors for LC and de-emphasized the role of smoking. Most participants were not aware that screening for LC existed. Several barriers and facilitators for LCS were identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Awareness about LCS among Black individuals is low. Addressing barriers may help increase LCS rates among Black individuals, ultimately reducing their LC mortality. The findings from our study have important implications in designing more effective interventions involving community health workers and healthcare clinicians to increase LCS uptake among Black individuals at high risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23271,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"volume\":\"13 8\",\"pages\":\"1877-1887\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11384478/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Translational lung cancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-269\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational lung cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tlcr-24-269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查能将肺癌(LC)死亡率降低 20%,但符合条件的筛查率仍然很低(5%-16%)。与美国其他种族/族裔群体相比,黑人更常受到肺癌的影响,但接受肺癌筛查(LCS)的可能性较低。我们的研究旨在探讨高风险黑人对 LCS 的认识和信念:我们在纽约州北部招募了符合 2021 年美国预防服务工作组(USPSTF)LCS 资格标准的黑人(17 人)。进行了深入的半结构式访谈、录音和转录,以探讨可能影响接受 LCS 的知识和信念。我们采用定性主题分析方法来确定和分析数据中的主题:我们确定了有关低烟和低碳生活方式的主要主题。尽管大多数参与者表示吸烟是 LC 的主要风险因素,但一些参与者更强调其他因素是 LC 的主要风险因素,而不再强调吸烟的作用。大多数参与者不知道存在 LC 筛查。结论:黑人对低血糖症的认识还不够:结论:黑人对低血糖症的认识不足。消除障碍可能有助于提高黑人的低碳酸血症患病率,最终降低他们的低碳酸血症死亡率。我们的研究结果对设计更有效的干预措施具有重要意义,这些干预措施涉及社区卫生工作者和医疗保健临床医生,以提高高风险黑人的 LCS 使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Knowledge and beliefs about lung cancer screening among Black individuals at high risk: a qualitative approach.

Background: Despite its efficacy in reducing lung cancer (LC)-specific mortality by 20%, screening with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) in eligible groups remains low (5-16%). Black individuals are more commonly affected by LC than other racial/ethnic groups in the United States (U.S.) but less likely to undergo LC screening (LCS). Our study aimed to explore the knowledge and beliefs of Black individuals at high risk regarding LCS.

Methods: Black individuals (n=17) who met the 2021 United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) LCS eligibility criteria were recruited in upstate New York. In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio recorded, and transcribed to explore knowledge and beliefs that could influence the uptake of LCS. A qualitative thematic analysis method was used to identify and analyze themes within the data.

Results: We identified principal themes about LC and LCS. Although most participants reported that smoking was the major risk factor for LC, some participants placed more emphasis on other factors as the major risk factors for LC and de-emphasized the role of smoking. Most participants were not aware that screening for LC existed. Several barriers and facilitators for LCS were identified.

Conclusions: Awareness about LCS among Black individuals is low. Addressing barriers may help increase LCS rates among Black individuals, ultimately reducing their LC mortality. The findings from our study have important implications in designing more effective interventions involving community health workers and healthcare clinicians to increase LCS uptake among Black individuals at high risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
137
期刊介绍: Translational Lung Cancer Research(TLCR, Transl Lung Cancer Res, Print ISSN 2218-6751; Online ISSN 2226-4477) is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, which was founded in March 2012. TLCR is indexed by PubMed/PubMed Central and the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) Databases. It is published quarterly the first year, and published bimonthly since February 2013. It provides practical up-to-date information on prevention, early detection, diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. Specific areas of its interest include, but not limited to, multimodality therapy, markers, imaging, tumor biology, pathology, chemoprevention, and technical advances related to lung cancer.
期刊最新文献
Systems mapping: a novel approach to national lung cancer screening implementation in Australia. The time-to-surgery interval and its effect on pathological response after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study. TQB2450 with or without anlotinib as maintenance treatment in subjects with locally advanced/unresectable non-small cell lung cancer that have not progressed after prior concurrent/sequential chemoradiotherapy (R-ALPS): study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase III trial. Triple-targeted therapy of dabrafenib, trametinib, and osimertinib for the treatment of the acquired BRAF V600E mutation after progression on EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer patients. What do we know about the role of neoadjuvant targeted therapy in early-stage EGFR-mutant and ALK-fused non-small cell lung cancer?-a narrative review of the current literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1