帕金森病患者接受脑深部刺激术后头皮切口感染的治疗措施。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.051
Xiaofei Jia, Jiping Li, Wenjie Zhang, Jing Wei, Yuqing Zhang
{"title":"帕金森病患者接受脑深部刺激术后头皮切口感染的治疗措施。","authors":"Xiaofei Jia, Jiping Li, Wenjie Zhang, Jing Wei, Yuqing Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, infection following DBS surgery is a serious complication that can lead to the recurrence and worsening of Parkinson's symptoms or related hardware reimplantation, causing considerable patient suffering and financial burden.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficiency of different treatment approaches for scalp incision infections after DBS surgery in PD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients with PD who experienced scalp infections following DBS at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether affected implants were removed or not. Fisher's exact test was applied to compare the reinfection rates between groups A and B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group A, 4 patients underwent debridement only, and all of them experienced reinfection between 2 and 25 months after the initial treatment. In group B, 9 patients underwent debridement and removal of potentially affected implants. Among them, 8 patients underwent reimplantation of the DBS device within 3-6 months after the initial treatment, and no cases of reinfection occurred. However, 1 patient experienced reinfection in the postauricular incision and percutaneous tunnel 5 months after the initial treatment, resulting in the complete removal of the entire DBS system. The reinfection rate in group B (11.11%) was significantly lower than that in group A (100%, P = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Scalp incision infections following DBS surgery can affect deep tissues, and the implementation of a comprehensive treatment strategy involving local debridement and removal of potentially affected implants can significantly reduce the risk of infection recurrence and its spread.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic Measures for Infections Originating from Scalp Incisions Following Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofei Jia, Jiping Li, Wenjie Zhang, Jing Wei, Yuqing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, infection following DBS surgery is a serious complication that can lead to the recurrence and worsening of Parkinson's symptoms or related hardware reimplantation, causing considerable patient suffering and financial burden.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficiency of different treatment approaches for scalp incision infections after DBS surgery in PD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients with PD who experienced scalp infections following DBS at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether affected implants were removed or not. Fisher's exact test was applied to compare the reinfection rates between groups A and B.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In group A, 4 patients underwent debridement only, and all of them experienced reinfection between 2 and 25 months after the initial treatment. In group B, 9 patients underwent debridement and removal of potentially affected implants. Among them, 8 patients underwent reimplantation of the DBS device within 3-6 months after the initial treatment, and no cases of reinfection occurred. However, 1 patient experienced reinfection in the postauricular incision and percutaneous tunnel 5 months after the initial treatment, resulting in the complete removal of the entire DBS system. The reinfection rate in group B (11.11%) was significantly lower than that in group A (100%, P = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Scalp incision infections following DBS surgery can affect deep tissues, and the implementation of a comprehensive treatment strategy involving local debridement and removal of potentially affected implants can significantly reduce the risk of infection recurrence and its spread.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.051\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.051","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑深部刺激(DBS)是治疗帕金森病(PD)的一种行之有效的方法。然而,DBS 术后感染是一种严重的并发症,可导致帕金森病症状复发和恶化或相关硬件的再次植入,给患者带来巨大痛苦和经济负担:本研究旨在比较不同治疗方法对帕金森病患者 DBS 术后头皮切口感染的治疗效果:我们对 2017 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间在我院接受脑深部刺激术后发生头皮感染的帕金森病患者进行了回顾性研究。根据受影响的植入物是否被移除,将患者分为两组。采用费雪精确检验比较 A 组和 B 组的再感染率:结果:在 A 组中,4 名患者只接受了清创术,他们都在初次治疗后的 2-25 个月内出现了再感染。在 B 组中,有 9 名患者接受了清创和移除可能受影响的植入物。其中,8 名患者在初次治疗后 3-6 个月内重新植入了 DBS 装置,没有再感染病例发生。但有一名患者在初次治疗 5 个月后,耳后切口和经皮隧道发生再感染,导致整个 DBS 系统被完全移除。B 组的再感染率(11.11%)明显低于 A 组(100%,P=0.007):结论:DBS 手术后头皮切口感染可影响深部组织,实施包括局部清创和移除可能受影响植入物的综合治疗策略可大大降低感染复发和扩散的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic Measures for Infections Originating from Scalp Incisions Following Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a well-established treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, infection following DBS surgery is a serious complication that can lead to the recurrence and worsening of Parkinson's symptoms or related hardware reimplantation, causing considerable patient suffering and financial burden.

Objective: This study aims to compare the therapeutic efficiency of different treatment approaches for scalp incision infections after DBS surgery in PD patients.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients with PD who experienced scalp infections following DBS at our hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether affected implants were removed or not. Fisher's exact test was applied to compare the reinfection rates between groups A and B.

Results: In group A, 4 patients underwent debridement only, and all of them experienced reinfection between 2 and 25 months after the initial treatment. In group B, 9 patients underwent debridement and removal of potentially affected implants. Among them, 8 patients underwent reimplantation of the DBS device within 3-6 months after the initial treatment, and no cases of reinfection occurred. However, 1 patient experienced reinfection in the postauricular incision and percutaneous tunnel 5 months after the initial treatment, resulting in the complete removal of the entire DBS system. The reinfection rate in group B (11.11%) was significantly lower than that in group A (100%, P = 0.007).

Conclusions: Scalp incision infections following DBS surgery can affect deep tissues, and the implementation of a comprehensive treatment strategy involving local debridement and removal of potentially affected implants can significantly reduce the risk of infection recurrence and its spread.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Management of Cholesteatoma: Hearing Rehabilitation. Congenital Cholesteatoma. Evaluation of Cholesteatoma. Management of Cholesteatoma: Extension Beyond Middle Ear/Mastoid. Recidivism and Recurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1