胸腔积液时胸管尺寸的选择:从胸外科医生和肺科医生的角度出发。

Rayyan M Almusally, Hatem Elbawab, Hasan Alswiket, Ryad Alamry, Hawra Aldar, Maram Alismail, Zahra Albahrani, Zeead Alghamdi, Farouk AlReshaid, Mohammed Sabri
{"title":"胸腔积液时胸管尺寸的选择:从胸外科医生和肺科医生的角度出发。","authors":"Rayyan M Almusally, Hatem Elbawab, Hasan Alswiket, Ryad Alamry, Hawra Aldar, Maram Alismail, Zahra Albahrani, Zeead Alghamdi, Farouk AlReshaid, Mohammed Sabri","doi":"10.1080/21548331.2024.2401315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current discourse within the thoracic surgical and pulmonological communities pertains to a contentious debate over the optimal selection criteria for thoracostomy tube diameters utilized in the management of pleural effusions. A comprehensive examination of the variables that inform the clinical decision-making paradigm for the determination of appropriate chest tube calibers is imperative to enhance patient management and elevate the prognostic results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this inquiry is to elucidate the determinants that influence thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists in their selection of chest tube size for the management of pleural effusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was based on an electronic questionnaire that was sent to the targeted populations through e-mail or a professional WhatsApp. The survey assessed the considerations of chest tube size selection as well as the respective advantages, disadvantages, and potential complications related to each size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conducted study encompassed participants, with a nearly even distribution between thoracic surgeons (49.1%) and pulmonologists (50.9%). Most of these practitioners are within tertiary-level medical institutions (82.1%). A preference for small-bore chest tubes (SBCT), defined as < 14 French (Fr), was indicated by 54.8% of participants. The drawbacks associated with SBCT, such as kinking (60%) and blockage (70%), influenced the decision-making process negatively, while pain was a significant factor in the selection against LBCT (64%). Ultrasound guidance was a positive influence for the selection of SBCT (55%). Complications associated with LBCT included visceral and vascular injuries (55.7%), wound infection (45.3%), re-expansion pulmonary edema (43.3%), and subcutaneous emphysema (57.5%). In contrast, malposition was a complication more commonly associated with SBCT (49.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decision regarding chest tube size was influenced by several critical factors which included the nature of pleural effusion, the volume of pleural fluid, and potential complications specific to the size of the chest tube used.</p>","PeriodicalId":35045,"journal":{"name":"Hospital practice (1995)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chest tube size selection for pleural effusion: from the perspective of thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists.\",\"authors\":\"Rayyan M Almusally, Hatem Elbawab, Hasan Alswiket, Ryad Alamry, Hawra Aldar, Maram Alismail, Zahra Albahrani, Zeead Alghamdi, Farouk AlReshaid, Mohammed Sabri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21548331.2024.2401315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current discourse within the thoracic surgical and pulmonological communities pertains to a contentious debate over the optimal selection criteria for thoracostomy tube diameters utilized in the management of pleural effusions. A comprehensive examination of the variables that inform the clinical decision-making paradigm for the determination of appropriate chest tube calibers is imperative to enhance patient management and elevate the prognostic results.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this inquiry is to elucidate the determinants that influence thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists in their selection of chest tube size for the management of pleural effusions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was based on an electronic questionnaire that was sent to the targeted populations through e-mail or a professional WhatsApp. The survey assessed the considerations of chest tube size selection as well as the respective advantages, disadvantages, and potential complications related to each size.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The conducted study encompassed participants, with a nearly even distribution between thoracic surgeons (49.1%) and pulmonologists (50.9%). Most of these practitioners are within tertiary-level medical institutions (82.1%). A preference for small-bore chest tubes (SBCT), defined as < 14 French (Fr), was indicated by 54.8% of participants. The drawbacks associated with SBCT, such as kinking (60%) and blockage (70%), influenced the decision-making process negatively, while pain was a significant factor in the selection against LBCT (64%). Ultrasound guidance was a positive influence for the selection of SBCT (55%). Complications associated with LBCT included visceral and vascular injuries (55.7%), wound infection (45.3%), re-expansion pulmonary edema (43.3%), and subcutaneous emphysema (57.5%). In contrast, malposition was a complication more commonly associated with SBCT (49.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decision regarding chest tube size was influenced by several critical factors which included the nature of pleural effusion, the volume of pleural fluid, and potential complications specific to the size of the chest tube used.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35045,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital practice (1995)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital practice (1995)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2024.2401315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital practice (1995)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2024.2401315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前,胸外科和肺病学界对胸腔造口术管直径的最佳选择标准争论不休。为了加强对患者的管理并提高预后效果,必须对决定适当胸腔导管口径的临床决策范式的相关变量进行全面研究:本研究旨在阐明影响胸外科医生和肺科医生选择胸腔导管尺寸以治疗胸腔积液的决定因素:这项横断面研究以电子问卷为基础,通过电子邮件或专业 WhatsApp 发送给目标人群。调查评估了选择胸腔导管尺寸的注意事项以及每种尺寸各自的优缺点和潜在并发症:参与调查的人员中,胸外科医生(49.1%)和肺科医生(50.9%)的比例基本持平。这些从业人员大多来自三级医疗机构(82.1%)。偏好小口径胸管 (SBCT),即结论:胸腔导管大小的决定受到几个关键因素的影响,其中包括胸腔积液的性质、胸腔积液的体积以及与所用胸腔导管大小相关的潜在并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chest tube size selection for pleural effusion: from the perspective of thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists.

Background: The current discourse within the thoracic surgical and pulmonological communities pertains to a contentious debate over the optimal selection criteria for thoracostomy tube diameters utilized in the management of pleural effusions. A comprehensive examination of the variables that inform the clinical decision-making paradigm for the determination of appropriate chest tube calibers is imperative to enhance patient management and elevate the prognostic results.

Objectives: The objective of this inquiry is to elucidate the determinants that influence thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists in their selection of chest tube size for the management of pleural effusions.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was based on an electronic questionnaire that was sent to the targeted populations through e-mail or a professional WhatsApp. The survey assessed the considerations of chest tube size selection as well as the respective advantages, disadvantages, and potential complications related to each size.

Results: The conducted study encompassed participants, with a nearly even distribution between thoracic surgeons (49.1%) and pulmonologists (50.9%). Most of these practitioners are within tertiary-level medical institutions (82.1%). A preference for small-bore chest tubes (SBCT), defined as < 14 French (Fr), was indicated by 54.8% of participants. The drawbacks associated with SBCT, such as kinking (60%) and blockage (70%), influenced the decision-making process negatively, while pain was a significant factor in the selection against LBCT (64%). Ultrasound guidance was a positive influence for the selection of SBCT (55%). Complications associated with LBCT included visceral and vascular injuries (55.7%), wound infection (45.3%), re-expansion pulmonary edema (43.3%), and subcutaneous emphysema (57.5%). In contrast, malposition was a complication more commonly associated with SBCT (49.1%).

Conclusion: The decision regarding chest tube size was influenced by several critical factors which included the nature of pleural effusion, the volume of pleural fluid, and potential complications specific to the size of the chest tube used.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital practice (1995)
Hospital practice (1995) Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊最新文献
An insight into the updated pharmacotherapy of metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) in lean individuals: a review. Chest tube size selection for pleural effusion: from the perspective of thoracic surgeons and pulmonologists. Prescription for crisis: the compounding effect of community drug shortages on Lebanon's healthcare system. Outcomes and complications of heart failure with iron deficiency anemia: a nationwide analysis. Benign acute myositis in an adult: case-based review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1