全膝关节置换术中胫骨组件下骨水泥渗透的不同粘接技术比较:一项回顾性观察研究。

Yu Okuno, Keita Nagira, Koji Ishida, Haruhisa Kanaya, Ikuta Hayashi, Makoto Enokida, Hideki Nagashima
{"title":"全膝关节置换术中胫骨组件下骨水泥渗透的不同粘接技术比较:一项回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Yu Okuno, Keita Nagira, Koji Ishida, Haruhisa Kanaya, Ikuta Hayashi, Makoto Enokida, Hideki Nagashima","doi":"10.1186/s43019-024-00232-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the differences in cement penetration between cementing techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated knee undergone TKA at our hospital for both preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) evaluations. Cementing was performed with hand mixing and hand packing (HM group) and with vacuum mixing and cement gun use (VM group). We measured the area under the tibial baseplate (sclerotic and nonsclerotic sides) and compared the mean and maximum depths of cement penetration at each area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 44 knees evaluated, 20 and 24 knees were in the HM and VM groups, respectively. At the center of the sclerotic side, the mean penetration depths (2.0 ± 0.7 and 2.5 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.02) and the maximum penetration depths (4.0 ± 0.9 and 5.0 ± 1.6 mm, p = 0.02) were significantly deeper in the VM group than in the HM group. The correlation between preoperative Hounsfield unit values and mean penetration were r = -0.617 (p < 0.01) and -0.373 (p = 0.01) in the HM and VM groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cementing technique of vacuum mixing and using a cement gun allowed for deeper cement penetration compared with the hand mixing and hand packing technique, even in bone sclerotic sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":36317,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery and Related Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414206/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different cementing techniques for cement penetration under tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Yu Okuno, Keita Nagira, Koji Ishida, Haruhisa Kanaya, Ikuta Hayashi, Makoto Enokida, Hideki Nagashima\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43019-024-00232-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the differences in cement penetration between cementing techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated knee undergone TKA at our hospital for both preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) evaluations. Cementing was performed with hand mixing and hand packing (HM group) and with vacuum mixing and cement gun use (VM group). We measured the area under the tibial baseplate (sclerotic and nonsclerotic sides) and compared the mean and maximum depths of cement penetration at each area.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 44 knees evaluated, 20 and 24 knees were in the HM and VM groups, respectively. At the center of the sclerotic side, the mean penetration depths (2.0 ± 0.7 and 2.5 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.02) and the maximum penetration depths (4.0 ± 0.9 and 5.0 ± 1.6 mm, p = 0.02) were significantly deeper in the VM group than in the HM group. The correlation between preoperative Hounsfield unit values and mean penetration were r = -0.617 (p < 0.01) and -0.373 (p = 0.01) in the HM and VM groups, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The cementing technique of vacuum mixing and using a cement gun allowed for deeper cement penetration compared with the hand mixing and hand packing technique, even in bone sclerotic sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee Surgery and Related Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11414206/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee Surgery and Related Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-024-00232-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43019-024-00232-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨全膝关节置换术(TKA)中不同骨水泥粘接技术在骨水泥渗透性方面的差异:我们对本院接受 TKA 的膝关节进行了回顾性评估,并进行了术前和术后计算机断层扫描(CT)评估。采用手工混合和手工包装(HM 组)以及真空混合和使用骨水泥枪(VM 组)进行骨水泥固定。我们测量了胫骨底板下的面积(硬化侧和非硬化侧),并比较了每个区域骨水泥渗透的平均深度和最大深度:在接受评估的44个膝关节中,HM组和VM组分别有20个和24个膝关节。在硬化侧中心,VM 组的平均穿透深度(2.0 ± 0.7 和 2.5 ± 0.7 mm,P = 0.02)和最大穿透深度(4.0 ± 0.9 和 5.0 ± 1.6 mm,P = 0.02)明显深于 HM 组。术前 Hounsfield 单位值与平均穿透度之间的相关性为 r = -0.617(p 结论:VM 组的穿透度明显高于 HM 组:与手工混合和手工包装技术相比,真空混合和使用骨水泥枪的骨水泥技术可使骨水泥渗透更深,即使在骨硬化部位也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of different cementing techniques for cement penetration under tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective observational study.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the differences in cement penetration between cementing techniques in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated knee undergone TKA at our hospital for both preoperative and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) evaluations. Cementing was performed with hand mixing and hand packing (HM group) and with vacuum mixing and cement gun use (VM group). We measured the area under the tibial baseplate (sclerotic and nonsclerotic sides) and compared the mean and maximum depths of cement penetration at each area.

Results: Of the 44 knees evaluated, 20 and 24 knees were in the HM and VM groups, respectively. At the center of the sclerotic side, the mean penetration depths (2.0 ± 0.7 and 2.5 ± 0.7 mm, p = 0.02) and the maximum penetration depths (4.0 ± 0.9 and 5.0 ± 1.6 mm, p = 0.02) were significantly deeper in the VM group than in the HM group. The correlation between preoperative Hounsfield unit values and mean penetration were r = -0.617 (p < 0.01) and -0.373 (p = 0.01) in the HM and VM groups, respectively.

Conclusion: The cementing technique of vacuum mixing and using a cement gun allowed for deeper cement penetration compared with the hand mixing and hand packing technique, even in bone sclerotic sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of different cementing techniques for cement penetration under tibial component in total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective observational study. Tryptophanyl tRNA synthetase is an alternative synovial biomarker for diagnosis of septic arthritis in knee joint. It is challenging to reproduce both anatomical and functional aspects of anterolateral reconstruction: postoperative 3D-CT analysis of the femoral tunnel position. Internal rotational patellar resection and patella alta induced patellar maltracking in total knee arthroplasty: intraoperative measurement of the patellofemoral pressure. Accurate, automated classification of radiographic knee osteoarthritis severity using a novel method of deep learning: Plug-in modules.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1