利用健康行为改变的多理论模型(MTM)解释健康行为:系统综述。

IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-07-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.42887
Sidath Kapukotuwa, Tara Nerida, Kavita Batra, Manoj Sharma
{"title":"利用健康行为改变的多理论模型(MTM)解释健康行为:系统综述。","authors":"Sidath Kapukotuwa, Tara Nerida, Kavita Batra, Manoj Sharma","doi":"10.34172/hpp.42887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utilization of a theoretical framework is vital in health promotion research, particularly when endeavoring to modify health behaviors. This systematic review aimed at evaluating and synthesizing evidence through studies conducted using the fourth-generation multi-theory model (MTM) of health behavior change for its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive article search was performed across MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier. The search focused on studies utilizing MTM from 2016 to December 2023, following the PRISMA guidelines for systemic reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An initial pool of 7583 articles was narrowed down through screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts. A total of 69 articles met the inclusion criteria. These studies, encompassing a global range of diverse target groups and health behaviors, were categorized as qualitative, cross-sectional, or experimental. The six qualitative studies revealed MTM themes for diverse health behaviors. The fifty-six cross-sectional studies showed MTM constructs effectively predicting behavior change, albeit with varying statistical significance. The seven experiments demonstrated MTM's role in initiating and sustaining change. For the initiation model, operationalized by 49 studies, the mean adjusted R<sup>2</sup> was 38.4% (SD=16.4%). For the sustenance model, operationalized by 45 studies, the mean adjusted R<sup>2</sup> was 38.9% (SD=15.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review corroborates the MTM as a potent framework for understanding, predicting, and facilitating health behavior changes. Its universal applicability and effectiveness underscore the model's potential as a foundational tool in designing future health promotion strategies and interventions aimed at positive and enduring behavior modifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"14 2","pages":"121-135"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of the multi-theory model (MTM) of health behavior change to explain health behaviors: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Sidath Kapukotuwa, Tara Nerida, Kavita Batra, Manoj Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/hpp.42887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The utilization of a theoretical framework is vital in health promotion research, particularly when endeavoring to modify health behaviors. This systematic review aimed at evaluating and synthesizing evidence through studies conducted using the fourth-generation multi-theory model (MTM) of health behavior change for its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive article search was performed across MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier. The search focused on studies utilizing MTM from 2016 to December 2023, following the PRISMA guidelines for systemic reviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An initial pool of 7583 articles was narrowed down through screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts. A total of 69 articles met the inclusion criteria. These studies, encompassing a global range of diverse target groups and health behaviors, were categorized as qualitative, cross-sectional, or experimental. The six qualitative studies revealed MTM themes for diverse health behaviors. The fifty-six cross-sectional studies showed MTM constructs effectively predicting behavior change, albeit with varying statistical significance. The seven experiments demonstrated MTM's role in initiating and sustaining change. For the initiation model, operationalized by 49 studies, the mean adjusted R<sup>2</sup> was 38.4% (SD=16.4%). For the sustenance model, operationalized by 45 studies, the mean adjusted R<sup>2</sup> was 38.9% (SD=15.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review corroborates the MTM as a potent framework for understanding, predicting, and facilitating health behavior changes. Its universal applicability and effectiveness underscore the model's potential as a foundational tool in designing future health promotion strategies and interventions aimed at positive and enduring behavior modifications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Promotion Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"14 2\",\"pages\":\"121-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11403345/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Promotion Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.42887\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.42887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在健康促进研究中,尤其是在努力改变健康行为时,利用理论框架至关重要。本系统性综述旨在通过使用第四代健康行为改变多理论模型(MTM)进行的研究,对其有效性的证据进行评估和综合:在 MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 Academic Search Premier 上进行了全面的文章检索。检索的重点是 2016 年至 2023 年 12 月期间使用 MTM 的研究,并遵循了系统性综述的 PRISMA 指南:通过筛选标题、摘要和全文,初步筛选出 7583 篇文章。共有 69 篇文章符合纳入标准。这些研究涵盖了全球不同的目标群体和健康行为,分为定性研究、横断面研究和实验研究。六项定性研究揭示了不同健康行为的 MTM 主题。56 项横断面研究表明,尽管统计意义各不相同,但心理疗法的构建有效地预测了行为的改变。七项实验证明了 MTM 在启动和维持改变中的作用。对于由 49 项研究操作的启动模式,平均调整 R2 为 38.4%(SD=16.4%)。对于由 45 项研究操作的维持模式,平均调整 R2 为 38.9%(标准差=15.5%):本系统综述证实,MTM 是理解、预测和促进健康行为改变的有效框架。该模型的普遍适用性和有效性凸显了其作为设计未来健康促进策略和干预措施的基础工具的潜力,这些策略和干预措施旨在实现积极而持久的行为改变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Utilization of the multi-theory model (MTM) of health behavior change to explain health behaviors: A systematic review.

Background: The utilization of a theoretical framework is vital in health promotion research, particularly when endeavoring to modify health behaviors. This systematic review aimed at evaluating and synthesizing evidence through studies conducted using the fourth-generation multi-theory model (MTM) of health behavior change for its effectiveness.

Methods: A comprehensive article search was performed across MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Academic Search Premier. The search focused on studies utilizing MTM from 2016 to December 2023, following the PRISMA guidelines for systemic reviews.

Results: An initial pool of 7583 articles was narrowed down through screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts. A total of 69 articles met the inclusion criteria. These studies, encompassing a global range of diverse target groups and health behaviors, were categorized as qualitative, cross-sectional, or experimental. The six qualitative studies revealed MTM themes for diverse health behaviors. The fifty-six cross-sectional studies showed MTM constructs effectively predicting behavior change, albeit with varying statistical significance. The seven experiments demonstrated MTM's role in initiating and sustaining change. For the initiation model, operationalized by 49 studies, the mean adjusted R2 was 38.4% (SD=16.4%). For the sustenance model, operationalized by 45 studies, the mean adjusted R2 was 38.9% (SD=15.5%).

Conclusion: This systematic review corroborates the MTM as a potent framework for understanding, predicting, and facilitating health behavior changes. Its universal applicability and effectiveness underscore the model's potential as a foundational tool in designing future health promotion strategies and interventions aimed at positive and enduring behavior modifications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
A systematic review of the impact of therapeutic education programs on the quality of life of people with Multiple Sclerosis. Childhood maltreatment and vulnerability to substance use disorders: The mediating role of psychological security. Corrigendum to: Examining associations between smartphone use, smartphone addiction, and mental health outcomes: a cross-sectional study of college students Kil N, Kim J, McDaniel JT, Kim J, Kensinger K. Health Promot Perspect. 2021;11(1):36-44. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2021.06. Corrigendum to: Prevalence and incidence of type 1 diabetes in the world: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mobasseri M, Shirmohammadi M, Amiri T, Vahed N, Hosseini Fard H, Ghojazadeh M. Health Promot Perspect. 2020 Mar 30;10(2):98-115. doi: 10.34172/hpp.2020.18. Development of a new equation and validation of earlier resting energy expenditure predicting equations in adults living in Tehran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1