从 COVID-19 大流行期间的社区合作中汲取的经验教训。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Jennifer K Frediani, Taylor W Smith, Shelley Spires, Paula Moreland, Gwin Thompson, Darlene Henderson, Sylvia Smith, Robert Maxwell, LaShawn M Hoffman, L Neicey Johnson, Xavier Bryant, Theresa Jacobs, Demetrius Geiger, Gretchen Wilde, Mary Beth Weber, Tabia Henry Akintobi, K M Venkat Narayan, Rakale C Quarells
{"title":"从 COVID-19 大流行期间的社区合作中汲取的经验教训。","authors":"Jennifer K Frediani, Taylor W Smith, Shelley Spires, Paula Moreland, Gwin Thompson, Darlene Henderson, Sylvia Smith, Robert Maxwell, LaShawn M Hoffman, L Neicey Johnson, Xavier Bryant, Theresa Jacobs, Demetrius Geiger, Gretchen Wilde, Mary Beth Weber, Tabia Henry Akintobi, K M Venkat Narayan, Rakale C Quarells","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Underserved communities have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Project Promoting Engagement and COVID-19 Testing for Health (PEACH) study was designed to understand the attitudes, beliefs, and infrastructure associated with COVID-19 risk, testing, and prevention behaviors in people living with, caring for, or at risk for type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this joint community-academic partnered manuscript is to share lessons learned for maintaining community partnerships through the challenging times of a pandemic. New and existing community partners were invited to share their perceptions about the facilitators and barriers of partnering with academia during the COVID-19 public health crisis. Key facilitators included those partners felt heard and their input valued. And the changing nature and demands in response to the pandemic on the partners' responsibilities were among the key challenges. Successful maintenance of the partnerships required flexibility, creativity, and a willingness to adapt engagement as community partners responded to the needs of their communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lessons Learned from Community Partnership During the COVID-19 Pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer K Frediani, Taylor W Smith, Shelley Spires, Paula Moreland, Gwin Thompson, Darlene Henderson, Sylvia Smith, Robert Maxwell, LaShawn M Hoffman, L Neicey Johnson, Xavier Bryant, Theresa Jacobs, Demetrius Geiger, Gretchen Wilde, Mary Beth Weber, Tabia Henry Akintobi, K M Venkat Narayan, Rakale C Quarells\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Underserved communities have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Project Promoting Engagement and COVID-19 Testing for Health (PEACH) study was designed to understand the attitudes, beliefs, and infrastructure associated with COVID-19 risk, testing, and prevention behaviors in people living with, caring for, or at risk for type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this joint community-academic partnered manuscript is to share lessons learned for maintaining community partnerships through the challenging times of a pandemic. New and existing community partners were invited to share their perceptions about the facilitators and barriers of partnering with academia during the COVID-19 public health crisis. Key facilitators included those partners felt heard and their input valued. And the changing nature and demands in response to the pandemic on the partners' responsibilities were among the key challenges. Successful maintenance of the partnerships required flexibility, creativity, and a willingness to adapt engagement as community partners responded to the needs of their communities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

缺乏服务的社区受到 COVID-19 大流行的影响尤为严重。促进参与和 COVID-19 检测促进健康项目(PEACH)研究旨在了解与 COVID-19 风险、检测和预防行为相关的态度、信念和基础设施,以及 2 型糖尿病患者、护理人员或高危人群的态度、信念和基础设施。这篇社区-学术界联合合作的手稿旨在分享在大流行的挑战时期保持社区合作伙伴关系的经验教训。新老社区合作伙伴应邀分享了他们对在 COVID-19 公共卫生危机期间与学术界合作的促进因素和障碍的看法。主要的促进因素包括:合作伙伴感到自己的意见被倾听和重视。而应对大流行病的不断变化的性质和对合作伙伴责任的要求则是主要挑战之一。成功维持合作伙伴关系需要灵活性、创造性以及随着社区合作伙伴对其社区需求做出响应而调整参与方式的意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Lessons Learned from Community Partnership During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Underserved communities have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Project Promoting Engagement and COVID-19 Testing for Health (PEACH) study was designed to understand the attitudes, beliefs, and infrastructure associated with COVID-19 risk, testing, and prevention behaviors in people living with, caring for, or at risk for type 2 diabetes. The purpose of this joint community-academic partnered manuscript is to share lessons learned for maintaining community partnerships through the challenging times of a pandemic. New and existing community partners were invited to share their perceptions about the facilitators and barriers of partnering with academia during the COVID-19 public health crisis. Key facilitators included those partners felt heard and their input valued. And the changing nature and demands in response to the pandemic on the partners' responsibilities were among the key challenges. Successful maintenance of the partnerships required flexibility, creativity, and a willingness to adapt engagement as community partners responded to the needs of their communities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
期刊最新文献
Lessons from Two Latino Communities Working with Academic Partners to Increase Access to COVID-19 Testing. Infectious Disease Preparedness for Homeless Populations: Recommendations from a Community-Academic Partnership. Evaluating the Impact and Effectiveness of Flint's Community Ethics Review Board (CBOP-CERB): A Pilot Study. Bridging the Gap: Addressing Immigrant Health Through Community-initiated Screening Events. Engaging with Rural Communities for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Using Modified Boot Camp Translation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1