额肌悬吊术和上睑提肌解剖-切除术治疗上睑提肌功能不佳的先天性上睑下垂后的眼睑功能比较。

Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1080/01676830.2024.2399665
Hesham A Ibrahim, Eman M Salem, Ibrahim Y Allam, Heba N Sabry
{"title":"额肌悬吊术和上睑提肌解剖-切除术治疗上睑提肌功能不佳的先天性上睑下垂后的眼睑功能比较。","authors":"Hesham A Ibrahim, Eman M Salem, Ibrahim Y Allam, Heba N Sabry","doi":"10.1080/01676830.2024.2399665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A levator dissection-resection technique (LDR) in which the levator is dissected free from all fibrous attachments including Whitnall's ligament was compared to two commonly used frontalis-based procedures in the management of congenital ptosis with poor levator function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients having congenital ptosis with poor levator function were randomized to one of the three surgical groups (ten patients for each group), namely, frontalis sling (FS), frontalis advancement flap (FAF), and (LDR) technique. Marginal reflex distance-one (MRD-1), levator function, symmetry in different levels of vertical gaze, lagophthalmos, and any other surgical complications were assessed 6 months following the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the three groups achieved statistically significant improvement in MRD-1 in the primary position of gaze (<i>p</i> = 0.001 for FS, 0.003 for FAF, 0.001 for LDR). Patients who underwent a frontalis-based procedure acquired an additional ability to elevate the upper eyelid by using their eyebrows. Patients who underwent LDR technique have acquired an additional mean of 5.79 ± 1 mm improvement in levator function with better symmetry during up and down gaze in unilateral cases. Patients from all groups had an equal degree of lagophthalmos with forced eyelid closure, and during sleep.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with ptosis and poor levator function who were managed with LDR technique achieved a similar degree of eyelid elevation in the primary gaze to that of frontalis-based procedures, acquired additional levator function, achieved more symmetry in up and down gaze in unilateral cases, and had no additional risk to the cornea.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of eyelid function following frontalis suspension and levator dissection-resection in congenital ptosis with poor levator function.\",\"authors\":\"Hesham A Ibrahim, Eman M Salem, Ibrahim Y Allam, Heba N Sabry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01676830.2024.2399665\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>A levator dissection-resection technique (LDR) in which the levator is dissected free from all fibrous attachments including Whitnall's ligament was compared to two commonly used frontalis-based procedures in the management of congenital ptosis with poor levator function.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty patients having congenital ptosis with poor levator function were randomized to one of the three surgical groups (ten patients for each group), namely, frontalis sling (FS), frontalis advancement flap (FAF), and (LDR) technique. Marginal reflex distance-one (MRD-1), levator function, symmetry in different levels of vertical gaze, lagophthalmos, and any other surgical complications were assessed 6 months following the intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the three groups achieved statistically significant improvement in MRD-1 in the primary position of gaze (<i>p</i> = 0.001 for FS, 0.003 for FAF, 0.001 for LDR). Patients who underwent a frontalis-based procedure acquired an additional ability to elevate the upper eyelid by using their eyebrows. Patients who underwent LDR technique have acquired an additional mean of 5.79 ± 1 mm improvement in levator function with better symmetry during up and down gaze in unilateral cases. Patients from all groups had an equal degree of lagophthalmos with forced eyelid closure, and during sleep.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with ptosis and poor levator function who were managed with LDR technique achieved a similar degree of eyelid elevation in the primary gaze to that of frontalis-based procedures, acquired additional levator function, achieved more symmetry in up and down gaze in unilateral cases, and had no additional risk to the cornea.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2024.2399665\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01676830.2024.2399665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在治疗上睑下垂且上睑提肌功能不佳的先天性上睑下垂时,将上睑提肌与包括惠特纳尔韧带在内的所有纤维附着物分离的上睑提肌分离-切除技术(LDR)与两种常用的基于额肌的手术进行了比较:将30例上睑提肌功能不佳的先天性上睑下垂患者随机分为三组(每组10例),即额肌吊带(FS)、额肌前移瓣(FAF)和(LDR)技术。干预6个月后,对边缘反射距离-1(MRD-1)、提上睑肌功能、不同垂直注视水平的对称性、眼睑下垂以及任何其他手术并发症进行评估:结果:三组患者在主要注视位置的 MRD-1 均有明显改善(P = 0.001(FS)、0.003(FAF)、0.001(LDR))。接受额肌手术的患者通过眉毛获得了抬高上眼睑的额外能力。接受 LDR 技术的患者的上睑提肌功能平均提高了 5.79 ± 1 毫米,单侧患者在上下凝视时的对称性更好。各组患者在强迫闭眼和睡眠时的眼睑下垂程度相同:结论:上睑下垂和提上睑肌功能不佳的患者在接受 LDR 技术治疗后,主要注视时眼睑抬高的程度与额肌手术相似,获得了额外的提上睑肌功能,单侧病例在上下注视时的对称性更好,并且对角膜没有额外的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
Comparison of eyelid function following frontalis suspension and levator dissection-resection in congenital ptosis with poor levator function.

Purpose: A levator dissection-resection technique (LDR) in which the levator is dissected free from all fibrous attachments including Whitnall's ligament was compared to two commonly used frontalis-based procedures in the management of congenital ptosis with poor levator function.

Methods: Thirty patients having congenital ptosis with poor levator function were randomized to one of the three surgical groups (ten patients for each group), namely, frontalis sling (FS), frontalis advancement flap (FAF), and (LDR) technique. Marginal reflex distance-one (MRD-1), levator function, symmetry in different levels of vertical gaze, lagophthalmos, and any other surgical complications were assessed 6 months following the intervention.

Results: Patients in the three groups achieved statistically significant improvement in MRD-1 in the primary position of gaze (p = 0.001 for FS, 0.003 for FAF, 0.001 for LDR). Patients who underwent a frontalis-based procedure acquired an additional ability to elevate the upper eyelid by using their eyebrows. Patients who underwent LDR technique have acquired an additional mean of 5.79 ± 1 mm improvement in levator function with better symmetry during up and down gaze in unilateral cases. Patients from all groups had an equal degree of lagophthalmos with forced eyelid closure, and during sleep.

Conclusion: Patients with ptosis and poor levator function who were managed with LDR technique achieved a similar degree of eyelid elevation in the primary gaze to that of frontalis-based procedures, acquired additional levator function, achieved more symmetry in up and down gaze in unilateral cases, and had no additional risk to the cornea.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1