因非专业性行为而被转介至专业健康监测计划的特征。

Alexandria G Polles, Cristiana N P Araujo, Rosalie S Hemphill, Hanzhi Gao, Lisa J Merlo
{"title":"因非专业性行为而被转介至专业健康监测计划的特征。","authors":"Alexandria G Polles, Cristiana N P Araujo, Rosalie S Hemphill, Hanzhi Gao, Lisa J Merlo","doi":"10.29158/JAAPL.240069-24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concerns about sexual misconduct by health care professionals have been highlighted by recent high-profile cases. Professional health monitoring programs (PHPs) offer an additional layer of protection when health care professionals with a history of unprofessional sexual behavior (USB) return to practice; however, little is known about the characteristics or outcomes of clinicians referred to a PHP because of USB. Data were extracted from over 35 years of PHP records involving USB-related referrals (<i>N</i> = 570). The majority of cases were deemed ineligible for PHP monitoring and handled by other entities (e.g., licensing board, legal system). Of the 232 monitored cases (46.84 ± 9.42 years; 95.7% male), most were physicians (<i>n</i> = 156, 67.2%), with 75.9 percent of monitored cases involving USB with at least one patient. Most (74.9%) PHP monitoring outcomes were classified as \"successful\" or \"very successful.\" Only three individuals (1.3%) who completed their monitoring were rereferred to the PHP. Monitored professionals exhibited less severe USB and were less likely to experience legal or disciplinary consequences (57.3% versus 69.8%, Cramer's V = .174, <i>p</i> < .0001) compared with unmonitored professionals. Findings enhance transparency of the PHP process and highlight its utility in safely returning clinicians to practice. Results may inform policies to prevent USB by health care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":47554,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing Referrals to Professional Health Monitoring Programs for Unprofessional Sexual Behavior.\",\"authors\":\"Alexandria G Polles, Cristiana N P Araujo, Rosalie S Hemphill, Hanzhi Gao, Lisa J Merlo\",\"doi\":\"10.29158/JAAPL.240069-24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Concerns about sexual misconduct by health care professionals have been highlighted by recent high-profile cases. Professional health monitoring programs (PHPs) offer an additional layer of protection when health care professionals with a history of unprofessional sexual behavior (USB) return to practice; however, little is known about the characteristics or outcomes of clinicians referred to a PHP because of USB. Data were extracted from over 35 years of PHP records involving USB-related referrals (<i>N</i> = 570). The majority of cases were deemed ineligible for PHP monitoring and handled by other entities (e.g., licensing board, legal system). Of the 232 monitored cases (46.84 ± 9.42 years; 95.7% male), most were physicians (<i>n</i> = 156, 67.2%), with 75.9 percent of monitored cases involving USB with at least one patient. Most (74.9%) PHP monitoring outcomes were classified as \\\"successful\\\" or \\\"very successful.\\\" Only three individuals (1.3%) who completed their monitoring were rereferred to the PHP. Monitored professionals exhibited less severe USB and were less likely to experience legal or disciplinary consequences (57.3% versus 69.8%, Cramer's V = .174, <i>p</i> < .0001) compared with unmonitored professionals. Findings enhance transparency of the PHP process and highlight its utility in safely returning clinicians to practice. Results may inform policies to prevent USB by health care professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240069-24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29158/JAAPL.240069-24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近一些备受关注的案例凸显了人们对医护人员性行为不当的担忧。当有过不专业性行为(USB)史的医护人员重新执业时,专业健康监测计划(PHP)提供了额外的保护;然而,人们对因 USB 而被转介到 PHP 的临床医生的特征或结果知之甚少。我们从超过 35 年的 PHP 记录中提取了涉及 USB 相关转诊的数据(N = 570)。大多数病例被认为不符合 PHP 监测条件,并由其他实体(如执照委员会、法律系统)处理。在 232 个受监控病例中(46.84 ± 9.42 岁;95.7% 为男性),大多数是医生(n = 156,67.2%),75.9% 的受监控病例至少涉及一名患者的 USB。大多数 PHP 监测结果(74.9%)被归类为 "成功 "或 "非常成功"。只有 3 人(1.3%)在完成监测后被重新转介到 PHP。与未接受监控的专业人员相比,接受监控的专业人员表现出的 USB 严重程度较低,并且不太可能遭遇法律或纪律后果(57.3% 对 69.8%,Cramer's V = .174,p < .0001)。研究结果提高了 PHP 程序的透明度,并强调了其在安全地让临床医生恢复执业方面的作用。研究结果可为制定预防医护人员滥用药物的政策提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Characterizing Referrals to Professional Health Monitoring Programs for Unprofessional Sexual Behavior.

Concerns about sexual misconduct by health care professionals have been highlighted by recent high-profile cases. Professional health monitoring programs (PHPs) offer an additional layer of protection when health care professionals with a history of unprofessional sexual behavior (USB) return to practice; however, little is known about the characteristics or outcomes of clinicians referred to a PHP because of USB. Data were extracted from over 35 years of PHP records involving USB-related referrals (N = 570). The majority of cases were deemed ineligible for PHP monitoring and handled by other entities (e.g., licensing board, legal system). Of the 232 monitored cases (46.84 ± 9.42 years; 95.7% male), most were physicians (n = 156, 67.2%), with 75.9 percent of monitored cases involving USB with at least one patient. Most (74.9%) PHP monitoring outcomes were classified as "successful" or "very successful." Only three individuals (1.3%) who completed their monitoring were rereferred to the PHP. Monitored professionals exhibited less severe USB and were less likely to experience legal or disciplinary consequences (57.3% versus 69.8%, Cramer's V = .174, p < .0001) compared with unmonitored professionals. Findings enhance transparency of the PHP process and highlight its utility in safely returning clinicians to practice. Results may inform policies to prevent USB by health care professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
29.60%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: The American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law (AAPL, pronounced "apple") is an organization of psychiatrists dedicated to excellence in practice, teaching, and research in forensic psychiatry. Founded in 1969, AAPL currently has more than 1,500 members in North America and around the world.
期刊最新文献
Legal and Ethics Concerns of Psilocybin as Medicine. A Review of the Interpretation of the Canadian Test for Fitness to Stand Trial. Clinical and Legal Considerations When Optimizing Trauma Narratives in Immigration Law Evaluations. Flexibility and Innovation in Decisional Capacity Assessment. Mental Health Service Referral and Treatment Following Screening and Assessment in Juvenile Detention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1