制定和验证发展目标,以转变全球药学实践框架。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.09.002
Diala Koudmani, Lina R Bader, Ian Bates
{"title":"制定和验证发展目标,以转变全球药学实践框架。","authors":"Diala Koudmani, Lina R Bader, Ian Bates","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In light of the expanding role of pharmacy in addressing global health challenges of Universal Health Coverage, advancing pharmacy practice to provide more effective pharmaceutical services has become imperative. This study aims to develop and validate a global goals-oriented pharmaceutical development framework to support and guide a systematic practice transformation that can widen access to better health for all.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach was used to conduct a series of exploration, development, and consensus phases. The exploratory stage included desk research focused on innovative pharmaceutical provision globally. Focus groups with 14 international pharmacists were held, selected via convenience sampling, to obtain primary data on perceptions of the proposed global FIP \"Development Goals\" framework. The consultation stage was followed by a modified nominal group technique (mNGT) with 61 global pharmacy leaders from 35 countries across six WHO regions, selected through purposive sampling, to further develop the content of the framework's first iteration. Lastly, an online two-round modified Delphi approach with 28 global pharmacy leaders, also selected via purposive sampling, was used to ensure the credibility and content validity of the outputs, generating consensus on the final framework matrix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exploratory stage produced a draft set of 13 unvalidated FIP Practice Development Goals (DGs) Framework (v0). Initial analysis of the mNGT showed complex intersections between the proposed set of goals, necessitating further modifications by embedding the previously published global Pharmaceutical Workforce Development Goals framework. This resulted in an amended FIP DGs Framework (v1) with 21 DGs. The evidence-led adjustment and distinctive format of the global consensus stage helped generate the validated, systematic FIP DGs Framework (final version), comprising 21 discrete global development goals ready for policy deployment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A systematic goals-oriented development framework was developed to respond to pharmaceutical development needs and support a needs-based roadmap for a sustainable pharmacy practice transformation globally, regionally and nationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and validating development goals towards transforming a global framework for pharmacy practice.\",\"authors\":\"Diala Koudmani, Lina R Bader, Ian Bates\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In light of the expanding role of pharmacy in addressing global health challenges of Universal Health Coverage, advancing pharmacy practice to provide more effective pharmaceutical services has become imperative. This study aims to develop and validate a global goals-oriented pharmaceutical development framework to support and guide a systematic practice transformation that can widen access to better health for all.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods approach was used to conduct a series of exploration, development, and consensus phases. The exploratory stage included desk research focused on innovative pharmaceutical provision globally. Focus groups with 14 international pharmacists were held, selected via convenience sampling, to obtain primary data on perceptions of the proposed global FIP \\\"Development Goals\\\" framework. The consultation stage was followed by a modified nominal group technique (mNGT) with 61 global pharmacy leaders from 35 countries across six WHO regions, selected through purposive sampling, to further develop the content of the framework's first iteration. Lastly, an online two-round modified Delphi approach with 28 global pharmacy leaders, also selected via purposive sampling, was used to ensure the credibility and content validity of the outputs, generating consensus on the final framework matrix.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The exploratory stage produced a draft set of 13 unvalidated FIP Practice Development Goals (DGs) Framework (v0). Initial analysis of the mNGT showed complex intersections between the proposed set of goals, necessitating further modifications by embedding the previously published global Pharmaceutical Workforce Development Goals framework. This resulted in an amended FIP DGs Framework (v1) with 21 DGs. The evidence-led adjustment and distinctive format of the global consensus stage helped generate the validated, systematic FIP DGs Framework (final version), comprising 21 discrete global development goals ready for policy deployment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A systematic goals-oriented development framework was developed to respond to pharmaceutical development needs and support a needs-based roadmap for a sustainable pharmacy practice transformation globally, regionally and nationally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.09.002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.09.002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:鉴于药学在应对全民医保的全球健康挑战方面的作用不断扩大,推进药学实践以提供更有效的药学服务已势在必行。本研究旨在开发和验证一个以全球目标为导向的药学发展框架,以支持和指导系统性的实践转型,从而扩大所有人获得更好健康的机会:方法:采用混合方法开展了一系列探索、开发和共识阶段的工作。探索阶段包括案头研究,重点是全球创新药物供应情况。通过方便抽样,与 14 名国际药剂师举行了焦点小组会议,以获取有关对拟议的全球 FIP "发展目标 "框架看法的原始数据。在磋商阶段之后,通过有目的的抽样,从世卫组织六个地区的 35 个国家中选出 61 名全球药剂学领袖,采用修改后的名义小组技术(mNGT),进一步完善框架的第一版内容。最后,对同样通过目的性抽样选出的 28 位全球药学领袖采用了两轮在线修正德尔菲法,以确保产出的可信度和内容的有效性,并就最终的框架矩阵达成共识:探索阶段产生了一套 13 项未经验证的 FIP 实践发展目标 (DGs) 框架草案(v0)。对 mNGT 的初步分析表明,这套拟议目标之间存在复杂的交叉关系,因此有必要进一步修改,将先前发布的全球制药人员发展目标框架纳入其中。最终,FIP DGs 框架(v1)修订为 21 个 DGs。以证据为导向的调整和全球共识阶段的独特形式有助于形成经过验证的、系统的 FIP DGs 框架(最终版本),其中包括 21 项可用于政策部署的离散全球发展目标:结论:制定了一个以目标为导向的系统性发展框架,以满足医药发展的需求,并为全球、地区和国家可持续药学实践转型提供基于需求的路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing and validating development goals towards transforming a global framework for pharmacy practice.

Introduction: In light of the expanding role of pharmacy in addressing global health challenges of Universal Health Coverage, advancing pharmacy practice to provide more effective pharmaceutical services has become imperative. This study aims to develop and validate a global goals-oriented pharmaceutical development framework to support and guide a systematic practice transformation that can widen access to better health for all.

Methods: A mixed methods approach was used to conduct a series of exploration, development, and consensus phases. The exploratory stage included desk research focused on innovative pharmaceutical provision globally. Focus groups with 14 international pharmacists were held, selected via convenience sampling, to obtain primary data on perceptions of the proposed global FIP "Development Goals" framework. The consultation stage was followed by a modified nominal group technique (mNGT) with 61 global pharmacy leaders from 35 countries across six WHO regions, selected through purposive sampling, to further develop the content of the framework's first iteration. Lastly, an online two-round modified Delphi approach with 28 global pharmacy leaders, also selected via purposive sampling, was used to ensure the credibility and content validity of the outputs, generating consensus on the final framework matrix.

Results: The exploratory stage produced a draft set of 13 unvalidated FIP Practice Development Goals (DGs) Framework (v0). Initial analysis of the mNGT showed complex intersections between the proposed set of goals, necessitating further modifications by embedding the previously published global Pharmaceutical Workforce Development Goals framework. This resulted in an amended FIP DGs Framework (v1) with 21 DGs. The evidence-led adjustment and distinctive format of the global consensus stage helped generate the validated, systematic FIP DGs Framework (final version), comprising 21 discrete global development goals ready for policy deployment.

Conclusion: A systematic goals-oriented development framework was developed to respond to pharmaceutical development needs and support a needs-based roadmap for a sustainable pharmacy practice transformation globally, regionally and nationally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy
Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
225
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.
期刊最新文献
The association between patient self-reported experiences with medication discharge counselling and hospital readmissions: A cross-sectional analysis of a population-based survey. Enhancing older Veterans' care: Insights from medication reviews and deprescribing interventions. Development and evaluation of a model to identify publications on the clinical impact of pharmacist interventions. A graphical model to make explicit pharmacist clinical reasoning during medication review. Developing and validating development goals towards transforming a global framework for pharmacy practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1