用自酸蚀性硅烷对玻璃和混合陶瓷进行表面调理是否能获得与传统粘接相似的粘接强度?体外研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-22 DOI:10.1111/jopr.13940
Victor Augusto Alves Bento, Pedro Antônio de Souza Rolim, José Roberto Vergínio de Matos, Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo Lemos, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Aimée Maria Guiotti
{"title":"用自酸蚀性硅烷对玻璃和混合陶瓷进行表面调理是否能获得与传统粘接相似的粘接强度?体外研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Victor Augusto Alves Bento, Pedro Antônio de Souza Rolim, José Roberto Vergínio de Matos, Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo Lemos, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Aimée Maria Guiotti","doi":"10.1111/jopr.13940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate, through in vitro studies, the bond strength of vitreous and hybrid ceramics with self-etching surface treatment compared to conventional treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and was registered on the open science framework (OSF) platform for in vitro studies. A population, intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) question was formulated: \"Does the surface conditioning of glass and hybrid ceramics with self-etching silane present a bond strength similar to that of conventional bonding?\". A literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases until September 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal guidelines for quasi-experimental studies were used for risk assessment of bias. The meta-analysis was based on the inverse variance (IV) method (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 in vitro studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in this systematic review, totaling 1889 ceramic samples. The meta-analysis indicated a significant decrease in the bond strength of HF 4%-5% with silane compared to self-etching (p < 0.05; MD: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13-0.35; I<sup>2</sup> = 3%, p = 0.42), while it indicated that there was no significant difference between self-etching compared to 9%-10% HF with silane (p = 0.92; MD: 0.02; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.36; I<sup>2</sup> = 14%, p = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-etching primer presents bond strength that is superior to or similar to conventional surface treatment on glass and hybrid ceramics.</p>","PeriodicalId":49152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the surface conditioning of glass and hybrid ceramics with self-etching silane present a bond strength similar to that of conventional bonding? Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.\",\"authors\":\"Victor Augusto Alves Bento, Pedro Antônio de Souza Rolim, José Roberto Vergínio de Matos, Cleidiel Aparecido de Araújo Lemos, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Aimée Maria Guiotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jopr.13940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate, through in vitro studies, the bond strength of vitreous and hybrid ceramics with self-etching surface treatment compared to conventional treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and was registered on the open science framework (OSF) platform for in vitro studies. A population, intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) question was formulated: \\\"Does the surface conditioning of glass and hybrid ceramics with self-etching silane present a bond strength similar to that of conventional bonding?\\\". A literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases until September 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal guidelines for quasi-experimental studies were used for risk assessment of bias. The meta-analysis was based on the inverse variance (IV) method (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 29 in vitro studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in this systematic review, totaling 1889 ceramic samples. The meta-analysis indicated a significant decrease in the bond strength of HF 4%-5% with silane compared to self-etching (p < 0.05; MD: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13-0.35; I<sup>2</sup> = 3%, p = 0.42), while it indicated that there was no significant difference between self-etching compared to 9%-10% HF with silane (p = 0.92; MD: 0.02; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.36; I<sup>2</sup> = 14%, p = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Self-etching primer presents bond strength that is superior to or similar to conventional surface treatment on glass and hybrid ceramics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13940\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13940","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过体外研究,评估采用自酸蚀表面处理的玻璃体和混合陶瓷与传统处理方法的粘接强度:本系统综述遵循系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA),并在体外研究开放科学框架(OSF)平台上注册。提出了一个关于人群、干预、控制和结果(PICO)的问题:"使用自酸蚀性硅烷对玻璃和混合陶瓷进行表面处理后,其粘接强度是否与传统粘接相似?在 PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library 和 ProQuest 数据库中进行了文献检索,直至 2023 年 9 月。乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)准实验研究批判性评估指南用于偏倚风险评估。荟萃分析基于逆方差(IV)法(P 结果):本系统综述共纳入了 2017 年至 2022 年间发表的 29 项体外研究,共计 1889 个陶瓷样本。荟萃分析表明,与自酸蚀相比,含硅烷 4%-5% HF 的粘接强度显著下降(p < 0.05;MD:0.34;95% CI:0.13-0.35;I2 = 3%,p = 0.42),而与含硅烷 9%-10% HF 相比,自酸蚀没有显著差异(p = 0.92;MD:0.02;95% CI:-0.32 至 0.36;I2 = 14%,p = 0.32):结论:自酸洗底漆对玻璃和混合陶瓷的粘接强度优于或类似于传统的表面处理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does the surface conditioning of glass and hybrid ceramics with self-etching silane present a bond strength similar to that of conventional bonding? Systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.

Purpose: To evaluate, through in vitro studies, the bond strength of vitreous and hybrid ceramics with self-etching surface treatment compared to conventional treatment.

Methods: This systematic review followed the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and was registered on the open science framework (OSF) platform for in vitro studies. A population, intervention, control, and outcome (PICO) question was formulated: "Does the surface conditioning of glass and hybrid ceramics with self-etching silane present a bond strength similar to that of conventional bonding?". A literature search was carried out in the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases until September 2023. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal guidelines for quasi-experimental studies were used for risk assessment of bias. The meta-analysis was based on the inverse variance (IV) method (p < 0.05).

Results: A total of 29 in vitro studies published between 2017 and 2022 were included in this systematic review, totaling 1889 ceramic samples. The meta-analysis indicated a significant decrease in the bond strength of HF 4%-5% with silane compared to self-etching (p < 0.05; MD: 0.34; 95% CI: 0.13-0.35; I2 = 3%, p = 0.42), while it indicated that there was no significant difference between self-etching compared to 9%-10% HF with silane (p = 0.92; MD: 0.02; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.36; I2 = 14%, p = 0.32).

Conclusion: Self-etching primer presents bond strength that is superior to or similar to conventional surface treatment on glass and hybrid ceramics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
171
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthodontics promotes the advanced study and practice of prosthodontics, implant, esthetic, and reconstructive dentistry. It is the official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists, the American Dental Association-recognized voice of the Specialty of Prosthodontics. The journal publishes evidence-based original scientific articles presenting information that is relevant and useful to prosthodontists. Additionally, it publishes reports of innovative techniques, new instructional methodologies, and instructive clinical reports with an interdisciplinary flair. The journal is particularly focused on promoting the study and use of cutting-edge technology and positioning prosthodontists as the early-adopters of new technology in the dental community.
期刊最新文献
Effect of magnetic resonance imaging protocol on decision-making for positioning of dental implants in edentulous cases. Utilization of digitally milled verification jigs for recording jaw relations in complete-arch implant rehabilitation: A digital clinical report. Influence of the post-processing protocol on a biocompatible 3D-printed resin. Intraoral scanning for implant-supported complete-arch fixed dental prostheses (ISCFDPs): Four clinical reports. Accuracy of intraoral versus desktop scanners used in digitizing polyvinyl siloxane impression for fabricating a CAD-CAM customized post and core.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1