{"title":"大疱性红斑狼疮与线性 IgA 大疱性皮肤病的组织病理学重叠:比较研究。","authors":"Lavanya Murugesu, Rajalakshmi Tirumalae","doi":"10.1097/DAD.0000000000002825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Bullous lupus erythematosus (BLE) and linear IgA disease (LAD) are rare autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases, with overlapping features despite different pathogenetic mechanisms. Diagnosis is based on immunofluorescence and serology. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the histopathologic features of BLE and LAD (11 cases each). The mean age was 36 years in both groups, and female preponderance was noted in BLE. Clinically, all cases presented as tense, itchy blisters distributed over the trunk, face, and extremities. Subepidermal neutrophil-rich blisters were seen in 60% BLE and 54.54% LAD cases. Eosinophils in the blisters were noted in 4 cases (36.4%) of linear IgA bullous dermatosis, but not in any of the BLE cases. The adjacent epidermal changes noted include spongiosis (33%; 40%), papillary microabscesses (22%; 20%), and basal tagging by neutrophils (77%; 70%). Superficial perivascular inflammation was seen in all cases while deep perivascular inflammation was observed in 54% BLE and 36% LAD cases. Lymphocytes were the predominant infiltrate. Increased dermal mucin was seen in 60% BLE and 45% LAD cases. None of the histopathologic features showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. Hence, histopathology alone is of limited value in distinguishing the 2 groups. Diagnosis rests on immunofluorescence and serologic findings, which should be used even in cases that seem to be classic LAD or patients without history of systemic lupus erythematosus.</p>","PeriodicalId":50967,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","volume":" ","pages":"739-745"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Histopathologic Overlap Between Bullous Lupus Erythematosus and Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Lavanya Murugesu, Rajalakshmi Tirumalae\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/DAD.0000000000002825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Bullous lupus erythematosus (BLE) and linear IgA disease (LAD) are rare autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases, with overlapping features despite different pathogenetic mechanisms. Diagnosis is based on immunofluorescence and serology. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the histopathologic features of BLE and LAD (11 cases each). The mean age was 36 years in both groups, and female preponderance was noted in BLE. Clinically, all cases presented as tense, itchy blisters distributed over the trunk, face, and extremities. Subepidermal neutrophil-rich blisters were seen in 60% BLE and 54.54% LAD cases. Eosinophils in the blisters were noted in 4 cases (36.4%) of linear IgA bullous dermatosis, but not in any of the BLE cases. The adjacent epidermal changes noted include spongiosis (33%; 40%), papillary microabscesses (22%; 20%), and basal tagging by neutrophils (77%; 70%). Superficial perivascular inflammation was seen in all cases while deep perivascular inflammation was observed in 54% BLE and 36% LAD cases. Lymphocytes were the predominant infiltrate. Increased dermal mucin was seen in 60% BLE and 45% LAD cases. None of the histopathologic features showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. Hence, histopathology alone is of limited value in distinguishing the 2 groups. Diagnosis rests on immunofluorescence and serologic findings, which should be used even in cases that seem to be classic LAD or patients without history of systemic lupus erythematosus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Dermatopathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"739-745\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Dermatopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000002825\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Dermatopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000002825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:红斑狼疮(BLE)和线性 IgA 病(LAD)是罕见的自身免疫性表皮下水疱病,尽管发病机制不同,但特征却相互重叠。诊断依据是免疫荧光和血清学。这项回顾性研究旨在比较 BLE 和 LAD(各 11 例)的组织病理学特征。两组病例的平均年龄均为 36 岁,BLE 病例中女性居多。临床上,所有病例均表现为分布在躯干、面部和四肢的紧张性瘙痒水疱。60%的BLE和54.54%的LAD病例可见表皮下富含中性粒细胞的水疱。在 4 例(36.4%)线性 IgA 大疱性皮肤病患者的水疱中发现了嗜酸性粒细胞,但在所有 BLE 患者中均未发现。邻近表皮的变化包括海绵状增生(33%;40%)、乳头状微脓肿(22%;20%)和中性粒细胞基底标记(77%;70%)。所有病例均可见浅层血管周围炎症,而 54% 的 BLE 和 36% 的 LAD 病例可见深层血管周围炎症。淋巴细胞是主要的浸润。在 60% 的 BLE 和 45% 的 LAD 病例中可见真皮粘蛋白增加。两组病例的组织病理学特征均无显著统计学差异。因此,仅靠组织病理学来区分两组病例的价值有限。诊断主要依靠免疫荧光和血清学检查结果,即使是看似典型的LAD病例或无系统性红斑狼疮病史的患者,也应使用免疫荧光和血清学检查结果。
Histopathologic Overlap Between Bullous Lupus Erythematosus and Linear IgA Bullous Dermatosis: A Comparative Study.
Abstract: Bullous lupus erythematosus (BLE) and linear IgA disease (LAD) are rare autoimmune subepidermal blistering diseases, with overlapping features despite different pathogenetic mechanisms. Diagnosis is based on immunofluorescence and serology. This retrospective study was undertaken to compare the histopathologic features of BLE and LAD (11 cases each). The mean age was 36 years in both groups, and female preponderance was noted in BLE. Clinically, all cases presented as tense, itchy blisters distributed over the trunk, face, and extremities. Subepidermal neutrophil-rich blisters were seen in 60% BLE and 54.54% LAD cases. Eosinophils in the blisters were noted in 4 cases (36.4%) of linear IgA bullous dermatosis, but not in any of the BLE cases. The adjacent epidermal changes noted include spongiosis (33%; 40%), papillary microabscesses (22%; 20%), and basal tagging by neutrophils (77%; 70%). Superficial perivascular inflammation was seen in all cases while deep perivascular inflammation was observed in 54% BLE and 36% LAD cases. Lymphocytes were the predominant infiltrate. Increased dermal mucin was seen in 60% BLE and 45% LAD cases. None of the histopathologic features showed a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups. Hence, histopathology alone is of limited value in distinguishing the 2 groups. Diagnosis rests on immunofluorescence and serologic findings, which should be used even in cases that seem to be classic LAD or patients without history of systemic lupus erythematosus.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Dermatopathology offers outstanding coverage of the latest diagnostic approaches and laboratory techniques, as well as insights into contemporary social, legal, and ethical concerns. Each issue features review articles on clinical, technical, and basic science advances and illuminating, detailed case reports.
With the The American Journal of Dermatopathology you''ll be able to:
-Incorporate step-by-step coverage of new or difficult-to-diagnose conditions from their earliest histopathologic signs to confirmatory immunohistochemical and molecular studies.
-Apply the latest basic science findings and clinical approaches to your work right away.
-Tap into the skills and expertise of your peers and colleagues the world over peer-reviewed original articles, "Extraordinary cases reports", coverage of practical guidelines, and graphic presentations.
-Expand your horizons through the Journal''s idea-generating forum for debating controversial issues and learning from preeminent researchers and clinicians