{"title":"利用基于深度学习的超分辨率重建技术提高腹部计算机断层扫描的空间分辨率并减少辐射剂量:模型研究。","authors":"Yoshinori Funama , Yasunori Nagayama , Daisuke Sakabe , Yuya Ito , Yutaka Chiba , Takeshi Nakaura , Seitaro Oda , Masafumi Kidoh , Toshinori Hirai","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>This study evaluated the performance of super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR) and compared with it that of hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and normal-resolution DLR (NR-DLR) for enhancing image quality in computed tomography (CT) images across various field of view (FOV) sizes, radiation doses, and noise reduction strengths.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A Catphan phantom equipped with an external body ring was used. CT images were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP), HIR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR across three noise reduction strengths: mild, standard, and strong. The noise power spectrum (NPS) was obtained from the FBP, HIR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR images at various FOVs, radiation doses, and noise reduction strengths. The noise magnitude ratio (NMR) and central frequency ratio (CFR) were calculated from the HIR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR images relative to the FBP images using NPS. The high-contrast value was obtained from the amplitude values of the peaks and valleys of profile curve and the task-based transfer function were also analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SR-DLR consistently demonstrated superior noise reduction capabilities, with NMR of 0.29–0.36 at reduced dose and 0.35–0.45 at standard dose, outperforming HIR and showing comparable efficiency to NR-DLR. The high-contrast values for SR-DLR were highest at mild and standard levels for both low and standard doses (0.610 and 0.726 at mild and 0.725 and 0.603 at standard levels). At the standard dose, the spatial resolution of SR-DLR was significantly improved, regardless of the noise reduction strength and FOV.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SR-DLR images achieved more substantial noise reduction than HIR and similar noise reduction as NR-DLR reconstructions while also improving spatial resolution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 3","pages":"Pages 1517-1524"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in spatial resolution and radiation dose reduction using super-resolution deep learning–based reconstruction for abdominal computed tomography: A phantom study\",\"authors\":\"Yoshinori Funama , Yasunori Nagayama , Daisuke Sakabe , Yuya Ito , Yutaka Chiba , Takeshi Nakaura , Seitaro Oda , Masafumi Kidoh , Toshinori Hirai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acra.2024.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>This study evaluated the performance of super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR) and compared with it that of hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and normal-resolution DLR (NR-DLR) for enhancing image quality in computed tomography (CT) images across various field of view (FOV) sizes, radiation doses, and noise reduction strengths.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A Catphan phantom equipped with an external body ring was used. CT images were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP), HIR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR across three noise reduction strengths: mild, standard, and strong. The noise power spectrum (NPS) was obtained from the FBP, HIR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR images at various FOVs, radiation doses, and noise reduction strengths. The noise magnitude ratio (NMR) and central frequency ratio (CFR) were calculated from the HIR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR images relative to the FBP images using NPS. The high-contrast value was obtained from the amplitude values of the peaks and valleys of profile curve and the task-based transfer function were also analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>SR-DLR consistently demonstrated superior noise reduction capabilities, with NMR of 0.29–0.36 at reduced dose and 0.35–0.45 at standard dose, outperforming HIR and showing comparable efficiency to NR-DLR. The high-contrast values for SR-DLR were highest at mild and standard levels for both low and standard doses (0.610 and 0.726 at mild and 0.725 and 0.603 at standard levels). At the standard dose, the spatial resolution of SR-DLR was significantly improved, regardless of the noise reduction strength and FOV.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>SR-DLR images achieved more substantial noise reduction than HIR and similar noise reduction as NR-DLR reconstructions while also improving spatial resolution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"32 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1517-1524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224006615\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224006615","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Advances in spatial resolution and radiation dose reduction using super-resolution deep learning–based reconstruction for abdominal computed tomography: A phantom study
Rationale and Objectives
This study evaluated the performance of super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR) and compared with it that of hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) and normal-resolution DLR (NR-DLR) for enhancing image quality in computed tomography (CT) images across various field of view (FOV) sizes, radiation doses, and noise reduction strengths.
Materials and Methods
A Catphan phantom equipped with an external body ring was used. CT images were reconstructed using filtered back-projection (FBP), HIR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR across three noise reduction strengths: mild, standard, and strong. The noise power spectrum (NPS) was obtained from the FBP, HIR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR images at various FOVs, radiation doses, and noise reduction strengths. The noise magnitude ratio (NMR) and central frequency ratio (CFR) were calculated from the HIR, NR-DLR, and SR-DLR images relative to the FBP images using NPS. The high-contrast value was obtained from the amplitude values of the peaks and valleys of profile curve and the task-based transfer function were also analyzed.
Results
SR-DLR consistently demonstrated superior noise reduction capabilities, with NMR of 0.29–0.36 at reduced dose and 0.35–0.45 at standard dose, outperforming HIR and showing comparable efficiency to NR-DLR. The high-contrast values for SR-DLR were highest at mild and standard levels for both low and standard doses (0.610 and 0.726 at mild and 0.725 and 0.603 at standard levels). At the standard dose, the spatial resolution of SR-DLR was significantly improved, regardless of the noise reduction strength and FOV.
Conclusion
SR-DLR images achieved more substantial noise reduction than HIR and similar noise reduction as NR-DLR reconstructions while also improving spatial resolution.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.