验证急诊执业护士的能力:病人复杂性与临床决策。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2024.08.006
Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Margaret Carman, Claire Simon
{"title":"验证急诊执业护士的能力:病人复杂性与临床决策。","authors":"Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Margaret Carman, Claire Simon","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over the past 15 years, the emergency nurse practitioner has been recognized as a nursing specialty role with dedicated scope and standards of practice. However, a paucity of objective data exists to validate the actual practice of emergency nurse practitioners in the emergency care setting. The purpose of this pilot study was to describe the initial acuity of patients assigned to emergency nurse practitioners, actions, decisional complexity, and disposition decisions of advanced practice nurses as they function in emergency departments in a single system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive exploratory study used retrospective chart data to gain understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common Emergency Severity Index level seen by emergency nurse practitioners was Emergency Severity Index 3. Of 8513 encounters with Emergency Severity Index level data, 21% were triaged at Emergency Severity Index 2, 56% at Emergency Severity Index 3, 21% at Emergency Severity Index 4, and only 2% at Emergency Severity Index 5. Half of encounters resulted in a Current Procedural Terminology code of 99825 or higher and 94% were coded at 99824 or higher. There were a high percentage of admissions including intensive care unit admissions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although descriptive, this study is highly illustrative of the broad scope of complex skills and clinical decision making required to perform as an advanced practice nurse in the emergency department. Further examination of education and training is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"88-95"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Emergency Nurse Practitioner Competencies: Patient Complexity and Clinical Decision Making.\",\"authors\":\"Lisa Wolf, Altair Delao, Margaret Carman, Claire Simon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jen.2024.08.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Over the past 15 years, the emergency nurse practitioner has been recognized as a nursing specialty role with dedicated scope and standards of practice. However, a paucity of objective data exists to validate the actual practice of emergency nurse practitioners in the emergency care setting. The purpose of this pilot study was to describe the initial acuity of patients assigned to emergency nurse practitioners, actions, decisional complexity, and disposition decisions of advanced practice nurses as they function in emergency departments in a single system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive exploratory study used retrospective chart data to gain understanding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common Emergency Severity Index level seen by emergency nurse practitioners was Emergency Severity Index 3. Of 8513 encounters with Emergency Severity Index level data, 21% were triaged at Emergency Severity Index 2, 56% at Emergency Severity Index 3, 21% at Emergency Severity Index 4, and only 2% at Emergency Severity Index 5. Half of encounters resulted in a Current Procedural Terminology code of 99825 or higher and 94% were coded at 99824 or higher. There were a high percentage of admissions including intensive care unit admissions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Although descriptive, this study is highly illustrative of the broad scope of complex skills and clinical decision making required to perform as an advanced practice nurse in the emergency department. Further examination of education and training is warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"88-95\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.08.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.08.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在过去的 15 年中,急诊执业护士已被公认为是一种具有专门执业范围和标准的护理专业角色。然而,目前尚缺乏客观数据来验证急诊护士在急诊环境中的实际操作。本试验性研究的目的是描述分配给急诊执业护士的病人的初始严重程度、行动、决策复杂性以及高级执业护士在单一系统的急诊科工作时的处置决定:这项描述性探索研究使用回顾性病历数据来了解情况:结果:急诊执业护士最常见的急诊严重程度指数级别是急诊严重程度指数3。在有急诊严重程度指数数据的 8513 次就诊中,21% 的就诊者被分诊为急诊严重程度指数 2,56% 的就诊者被分诊为急诊严重程度指数 3,21% 的就诊者被分诊为急诊严重程度指数 4,只有 2% 的就诊者被分诊为急诊严重程度指数 5。半数就诊者的当前程序术语代码为 99825 或更高,94% 的就诊者的当前程序术语代码为 99824 或更高。包括重症监护室在内的入院比例很高:本研究虽然是描述性的,但高度说明了作为急诊科高级实践护士所需的复杂技能和临床决策的广泛范围。有必要对教育和培训进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Validation of Emergency Nurse Practitioner Competencies: Patient Complexity and Clinical Decision Making.

Introduction: Over the past 15 years, the emergency nurse practitioner has been recognized as a nursing specialty role with dedicated scope and standards of practice. However, a paucity of objective data exists to validate the actual practice of emergency nurse practitioners in the emergency care setting. The purpose of this pilot study was to describe the initial acuity of patients assigned to emergency nurse practitioners, actions, decisional complexity, and disposition decisions of advanced practice nurses as they function in emergency departments in a single system.

Methods: This descriptive exploratory study used retrospective chart data to gain understanding.

Results: The most common Emergency Severity Index level seen by emergency nurse practitioners was Emergency Severity Index 3. Of 8513 encounters with Emergency Severity Index level data, 21% were triaged at Emergency Severity Index 2, 56% at Emergency Severity Index 3, 21% at Emergency Severity Index 4, and only 2% at Emergency Severity Index 5. Half of encounters resulted in a Current Procedural Terminology code of 99825 or higher and 94% were coded at 99824 or higher. There were a high percentage of admissions including intensive care unit admissions.

Discussion: Although descriptive, this study is highly illustrative of the broad scope of complex skills and clinical decision making required to perform as an advanced practice nurse in the emergency department. Further examination of education and training is warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Emergency Nurses' Perspectives on Adopting Geriatric Screenings for Cognitive Impairment: A Qualitative Study. Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner's Confidence to Care for Black, Indigenous, and Transgender Survivors: Development and Preliminary Content Validity of Practice Vignettes. The Impact of HIRAID Implementation on the Accuracy of Emergency Nurse Documentation in Australian Rural Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Quasi-Experimental Study. Psychological Distress and the Needs of Family Members of Critically Ill Patients in Emergency Departments During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. Attitudes and Barriers of Emergency Nurses and Physicians Toward Family Presence During Resuscitation in Iran: A Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1