眼周形态的多维定量表征:通过深度学习网络区分内斜视和外斜视。

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-29 DOI:10.21037/qims-24-155
Huimin Li, Shengqiang Shi, Lixia Lou, Jing Cao, Ziying Zhou, Xingru Huang, Juan Ye
{"title":"眼周形态的多维定量表征:通过深度学习网络区分内斜视和外斜视。","authors":"Huimin Li, Shengqiang Shi, Lixia Lou, Jing Cao, Ziying Zhou, Xingru Huang, Juan Ye","doi":"10.21037/qims-24-155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prominent epicanthus could not only diminish the eyes' aesthetics but may be deceptive for its typical appearance of pseudo-esotropia. This study aims to apply a deep learning model to characterize the periocular morphology for preliminary identification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study consecutively included 300 subjects visiting the ophthalmology department in a tertiary referral hospital. Children aged 7-18 years with simple epicanthus or concomitant esotropia and healthy volunteers who were age- and gender-matched were eligible for inclusion. Multiple metrics were extracted automatically and manually from facial images to characterize the periocular morphology and binocular symmetry. The dice coefficient (Dice), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman biases were calculated to evaluate their consistency. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined the cut-off values of symmetry indexes (SIs) for distinguishing concomitant esotropia subjects from epicanthus ones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Dice for eyelid and cornea segmentation were 0.949 and 0.944, respectively. The ICCs of the two measurements ranged from 0.898 to 0.983. Biases ranged from 0.16 to 0.74 mm. The periocular morphology of epicanthus eyes was significantly different from the normal ones, including palpebral fissure width (21.41±1.53 <i>vs.</i> 24.45±1.82 mm; P<0.01), and palpebral fissure height (8.91±1.37 <i>vs.</i> 9.60±1.25 mm; P<0.01). The ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.971 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.950-0.991] with SI for distinguishing esotropia subjects. Its optimal cut-off value was 1.296 with 0.920 sensitivity and 0.910 specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study established a standard deep learning system for characterizing the periocular morphology of epicanthus and esotropia eyes with great accuracy. This objective method could be generalized to other periocular morphological assessments for clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54267,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","volume":"14 9","pages":"6273-6284"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11400697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multidimensional quantitative characterization of periocular morphology: distinguishing esotropia from epicanthus by deep learning network.\",\"authors\":\"Huimin Li, Shengqiang Shi, Lixia Lou, Jing Cao, Ziying Zhou, Xingru Huang, Juan Ye\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/qims-24-155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prominent epicanthus could not only diminish the eyes' aesthetics but may be deceptive for its typical appearance of pseudo-esotropia. This study aims to apply a deep learning model to characterize the periocular morphology for preliminary identification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study consecutively included 300 subjects visiting the ophthalmology department in a tertiary referral hospital. Children aged 7-18 years with simple epicanthus or concomitant esotropia and healthy volunteers who were age- and gender-matched were eligible for inclusion. Multiple metrics were extracted automatically and manually from facial images to characterize the periocular morphology and binocular symmetry. The dice coefficient (Dice), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman biases were calculated to evaluate their consistency. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined the cut-off values of symmetry indexes (SIs) for distinguishing concomitant esotropia subjects from epicanthus ones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Dice for eyelid and cornea segmentation were 0.949 and 0.944, respectively. The ICCs of the two measurements ranged from 0.898 to 0.983. Biases ranged from 0.16 to 0.74 mm. The periocular morphology of epicanthus eyes was significantly different from the normal ones, including palpebral fissure width (21.41±1.53 <i>vs.</i> 24.45±1.82 mm; P<0.01), and palpebral fissure height (8.91±1.37 <i>vs.</i> 9.60±1.25 mm; P<0.01). The ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.971 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.950-0.991] with SI for distinguishing esotropia subjects. Its optimal cut-off value was 1.296 with 0.920 sensitivity and 0.910 specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study established a standard deep learning system for characterizing the periocular morphology of epicanthus and esotropia eyes with great accuracy. This objective method could be generalized to other periocular morphological assessments for clinical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"volume\":\"14 9\",\"pages\":\"6273-6284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11400697/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-155\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-24-155","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:突出的上睑下垂不仅会降低眼睛的美感,还可能因其典型的假性外斜而具有欺骗性。本研究旨在应用深度学习模型来描述眼周形态特征,以进行初步识别:这项前瞻性研究连续纳入了在一家三级转诊医院眼科就诊的 300 名受试者。年龄在 7-18 岁、患有单纯性上睑下垂或伴有内斜视的儿童,以及年龄和性别匹配的健康志愿者均符合纳入条件。从面部图像中自动和手动提取多种指标,以描述眼周形态和双眼对称性。计算骰子系数(Dice)、类内相关系数(ICC)和布兰-阿尔特曼偏差,以评估其一致性。接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)确定了用于区分合并内斜视和外斜视受试者的对称指数(SIs)临界值:眼睑和角膜分割的 Dice 分别为 0.949 和 0.944。两次测量的 ICC 在 0.898 至 0.983 之间。偏差范围为 0.16 至 0.74 毫米。上睑下垂眼的眼周形态与正常眼有显著差异,包括睑裂宽度(21.41±1.53 mm vs. 24.45±1.82 mm; Pvs:我们的研究建立了一个标准的深度学习系统,可以非常准确地描述上睑下垂和内斜视眼的眼周形态。这种客观方法可推广到其他眼周形态评估中,用于临床护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multidimensional quantitative characterization of periocular morphology: distinguishing esotropia from epicanthus by deep learning network.

Background: Prominent epicanthus could not only diminish the eyes' aesthetics but may be deceptive for its typical appearance of pseudo-esotropia. This study aims to apply a deep learning model to characterize the periocular morphology for preliminary identification.

Methods: This prospective study consecutively included 300 subjects visiting the ophthalmology department in a tertiary referral hospital. Children aged 7-18 years with simple epicanthus or concomitant esotropia and healthy volunteers who were age- and gender-matched were eligible for inclusion. Multiple metrics were extracted automatically and manually from facial images to characterize the periocular morphology and binocular symmetry. The dice coefficient (Dice), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and Bland-Altman biases were calculated to evaluate their consistency. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve determined the cut-off values of symmetry indexes (SIs) for distinguishing concomitant esotropia subjects from epicanthus ones.

Results: The Dice for eyelid and cornea segmentation were 0.949 and 0.944, respectively. The ICCs of the two measurements ranged from 0.898 to 0.983. Biases ranged from 0.16 to 0.74 mm. The periocular morphology of epicanthus eyes was significantly different from the normal ones, including palpebral fissure width (21.41±1.53 vs. 24.45±1.82 mm; P<0.01), and palpebral fissure height (8.91±1.37 vs. 9.60±1.25 mm; P<0.01). The ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.971 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.950-0.991] with SI for distinguishing esotropia subjects. Its optimal cut-off value was 1.296 with 0.920 sensitivity and 0.910 specificity.

Conclusions: Our study established a standard deep learning system for characterizing the periocular morphology of epicanthus and esotropia eyes with great accuracy. This objective method could be generalized to other periocular morphological assessments for clinical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
17.90%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Information not localized
期刊最新文献
Metastatic bone lesion type in gastric cancer patients: imaging findings of case reports. Minimally invasive interventional guided imaging therapies of musculoskeletal tumors. Myosteatosis: diagnostic significance and assessment by imaging approaches. Narrative review of chest wall ultrasound: a practical approach. Natural language processing-based analysis of the level of adoption by expert radiologists of the ASSR, ASNR and NASS version 2.0 of lumbar disc nomenclature: an eight-year survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1