Leanne M. Boehm PhD, RN, ACNS-BC , Kelly Potter PhD, RN , Joanne McPeake PhD, MSc, BN (Hons), RGN , Martin Shaw PhD, MSci , Han Su PhD, RN , Abigail C. Jones MEd, RN , Valerie Renard MSN, AGACNP-BC, CCRN , Tammy L. Eaton PhD, MSc, RN, FNP-BC , Carl Boethel MD , Javed Butler MD, MPH, MBA , Rachel Lane Walden MLIS , Valerie Danesh PhD, RN
{"title":"了解心脏、肺部和重症监护室康复/恢复项目的出勤模式和决定因素：系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Leanne M. Boehm PhD, RN, ACNS-BC , Kelly Potter PhD, RN , Joanne McPeake PhD, MSc, BN (Hons), RGN , Martin Shaw PhD, MSci , Han Su PhD, RN , Abigail C. Jones MEd, RN , Valerie Renard MSN, AGACNP-BC, CCRN , Tammy L. Eaton PhD, MSc, RN, FNP-BC , Carl Boethel MD , Javed Butler MD, MPH, MBA , Rachel Lane Walden MLIS , Valerie Danesh PhD, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.09.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac, pulmonary, and intensive care unit (ICU) rehabilitation/recovery programs are health promotion interventions designed to improve physical recovery, psychological well-being, and quality of life after acute illness while reducing the risk of adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Identify the difference in attendance rates for patients invited to a cardiac rehabilitation, pulmonary rehabilitation, or ICU recovery program and factors influencing attendance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and manual reference lists from inception to June 3, 2024. We included studies reporting patient attendance rates in eligible programs following acute illness hospitalization. Two team members independently screened articles and extracted data, with a third member reviewing and achieving consensus when necessary. Our main outcomes focused on the proportion of attendance in eligible programs among patients referred.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 3,446 studies screened, 179 studies (<em>N</em> = 4,779,012 patients) were included across cardiac rehabilitation (<em>n</em> = 153 studies), pulmonary rehabilitation (<em>n</em> = 11 studies), and ICU recovery (<em>n</em> = 15 studies) programs. Pooled attendance rates were 53 % (95 % CI: 48-57 %) for cardiac rehabilitation, 56 % (95 % CI: 42-70 %) for pulmonary rehabilitation, and 61 % (95 % CI: 51-70 %) for ICU recovery programs. Significant attendance heterogeneity was present (cardiac I<sup>2</sup>=100 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001; pulmonary I<sup>2</sup>=100 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001; ICU I<sup>2</sup>=94 %, <em>p</em> < 0.01). Barriers to attendance included transportation, distance, work conflicts, and patient factors (e.g., comorbidities, older age). Facilitators included male gender, younger age, higher education, income, provider recommendations, and flexible scheduling. Individual factors represented the primary domain affecting attendance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results indicate comparable attendance rates and factors shaping attendance across acute illness rehabilitation/recovery programs, with ICU recovery programs being the most well-attended on average.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>PROSPERO CRD42022357261</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages 51-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014795632400181X/pdfft?md5=18f572d2d5ee58f86ebf90f64359cfa6&pid=1-s2.0-S014795632400181X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding attendance patterns and determinants in cardiac, pulmonary, and ICU Rehabilitation/Recovery programs: A systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Leanne M. Boehm PhD, RN, ACNS-BC , Kelly Potter PhD, RN , Joanne McPeake PhD, MSc, BN (Hons), RGN , Martin Shaw PhD, MSci , Han Su PhD, RN , Abigail C. Jones MEd, RN , Valerie Renard MSN, AGACNP-BC, CCRN , Tammy L. Eaton PhD, MSc, RN, FNP-BC , Carl Boethel MD , Javed Butler MD, MPH, MBA , Rachel Lane Walden MLIS , Valerie Danesh PhD, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.09.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cardiac, pulmonary, and intensive care unit (ICU) rehabilitation/recovery programs are health promotion interventions designed to improve physical recovery, psychological well-being, and quality of life after acute illness while reducing the risk of adverse events.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Identify the difference in attendance rates for patients invited to a cardiac rehabilitation, pulmonary rehabilitation, or ICU recovery program and factors influencing attendance.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and manual reference lists from inception to June 3, 2024. We included studies reporting patient attendance rates in eligible programs following acute illness hospitalization. Two team members independently screened articles and extracted data, with a third member reviewing and achieving consensus when necessary. Our main outcomes focused on the proportion of attendance in eligible programs among patients referred.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 3,446 studies screened, 179 studies (<em>N</em> = 4,779,012 patients) were included across cardiac rehabilitation (<em>n</em> = 153 studies), pulmonary rehabilitation (<em>n</em> = 11 studies), and ICU recovery (<em>n</em> = 15 studies) programs. Pooled attendance rates were 53 % (95 % CI: 48-57 %) for cardiac rehabilitation, 56 % (95 % CI: 42-70 %) for pulmonary rehabilitation, and 61 % (95 % CI: 51-70 %) for ICU recovery programs. Significant attendance heterogeneity was present (cardiac I<sup>2</sup>=100 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001; pulmonary I<sup>2</sup>=100 %, <em>p</em> < 0.001; ICU I<sup>2</sup>=94 %, <em>p</em> < 0.01). Barriers to attendance included transportation, distance, work conflicts, and patient factors (e.g., comorbidities, older age). Facilitators included male gender, younger age, higher education, income, provider recommendations, and flexible scheduling. Individual factors represented the primary domain affecting attendance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The results indicate comparable attendance rates and factors shaping attendance across acute illness rehabilitation/recovery programs, with ICU recovery programs being the most well-attended on average.</div></div><div><h3>Registration</h3><div>PROSPERO CRD42022357261</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55064,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heart & Lung\",\"volume\":\"69 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-61\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014795632400181X/pdfft?md5=18f572d2d5ee58f86ebf90f64359cfa6&pid=1-s2.0-S014795632400181X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heart & Lung\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014795632400181X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014795632400181X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Understanding attendance patterns and determinants in cardiac, pulmonary, and ICU Rehabilitation/Recovery programs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Background
Cardiac, pulmonary, and intensive care unit (ICU) rehabilitation/recovery programs are health promotion interventions designed to improve physical recovery, psychological well-being, and quality of life after acute illness while reducing the risk of adverse events.
Objective
Identify the difference in attendance rates for patients invited to a cardiac rehabilitation, pulmonary rehabilitation, or ICU recovery program and factors influencing attendance.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and manual reference lists from inception to June 3, 2024. We included studies reporting patient attendance rates in eligible programs following acute illness hospitalization. Two team members independently screened articles and extracted data, with a third member reviewing and achieving consensus when necessary. Our main outcomes focused on the proportion of attendance in eligible programs among patients referred.
Results
Of 3,446 studies screened, 179 studies (N = 4,779,012 patients) were included across cardiac rehabilitation (n = 153 studies), pulmonary rehabilitation (n = 11 studies), and ICU recovery (n = 15 studies) programs. Pooled attendance rates were 53 % (95 % CI: 48-57 %) for cardiac rehabilitation, 56 % (95 % CI: 42-70 %) for pulmonary rehabilitation, and 61 % (95 % CI: 51-70 %) for ICU recovery programs. Significant attendance heterogeneity was present (cardiac I2=100 %, p < 0.001; pulmonary I2=100 %, p < 0.001; ICU I2=94 %, p < 0.01). Barriers to attendance included transportation, distance, work conflicts, and patient factors (e.g., comorbidities, older age). Facilitators included male gender, younger age, higher education, income, provider recommendations, and flexible scheduling. Individual factors represented the primary domain affecting attendance.
Conclusions
The results indicate comparable attendance rates and factors shaping attendance across acute illness rehabilitation/recovery programs, with ICU recovery programs being the most well-attended on average.
期刊介绍：
Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders.
The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
