乡村的现实:了解偏远地区对西澳大利亚院外心脏骤停的影响--一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Australian Journal of Rural Health Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1111/ajr.13184
Ashlea Smith, Stephen Ball, Karen Stewart, Judith Finn
{"title":"乡村的现实:了解偏远地区对西澳大利亚院外心脏骤停的影响--一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Ashlea Smith, Stephen Ball, Karen Stewart, Judith Finn","doi":"10.1111/ajr.13184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Western Australia (WA) spans a large, sparsely-populated area of Australia, presenting a challenge for the provision of Emergency Medical Service (EMS), particularly for time-critical emergencies such as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of rurality on the epidemiology, incidence and survival of OHCA in WA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of EMS-attended OHCA in WA from 2015 to 2022. Incidence was calculated on all OHCAs, but the study cohort for the multivariable regression analysis of rurality on survival outcomes consisted of OHCAs of medical aetiology with EMS resuscitation attempted. Rurality was categorised into four categories, derived from the Australian Standard Geographic Classification - Remoteness Areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age-standardised incidence of EMS-attended OHCA per 100 000 population increased with increasing remoteness: Major Cities = 104.9, Inner Regional = 123.3, Outer Regional = 138.0 and Remote = 103.9. Compared to Major Cities, the adjusted odds for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital were lower in Inner Regional (aOR = 0.71, 95%CI 0.53-0.95), Outer Regional (aOR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.45-0.86) and Remote areas (aOR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.35-0.77) but there was no statistically significant difference for 30-day survival. Relative to Major Cities, Regional and Remote areas had longer response times, shorter transport-to-hospital times, and higher rates of bystander CPR and automated external defibrillator use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in rural areas had lower odds of ROSC at hospital compared to metropolitan areas, despite adjustment for known prognostic covariates. Despite WA's highly sparse regional population, these differences in ROSC are consistent with those reported in other international studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The reality of rurality: Understanding the impact of remoteness on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Western Australia - A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Ashlea Smith, Stephen Ball, Karen Stewart, Judith Finn\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajr.13184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Western Australia (WA) spans a large, sparsely-populated area of Australia, presenting a challenge for the provision of Emergency Medical Service (EMS), particularly for time-critical emergencies such as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of rurality on the epidemiology, incidence and survival of OHCA in WA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of EMS-attended OHCA in WA from 2015 to 2022. Incidence was calculated on all OHCAs, but the study cohort for the multivariable regression analysis of rurality on survival outcomes consisted of OHCAs of medical aetiology with EMS resuscitation attempted. Rurality was categorised into four categories, derived from the Australian Standard Geographic Classification - Remoteness Areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The age-standardised incidence of EMS-attended OHCA per 100 000 population increased with increasing remoteness: Major Cities = 104.9, Inner Regional = 123.3, Outer Regional = 138.0 and Remote = 103.9. Compared to Major Cities, the adjusted odds for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital were lower in Inner Regional (aOR = 0.71, 95%CI 0.53-0.95), Outer Regional (aOR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.45-0.86) and Remote areas (aOR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.35-0.77) but there was no statistically significant difference for 30-day survival. Relative to Major Cities, Regional and Remote areas had longer response times, shorter transport-to-hospital times, and higher rates of bystander CPR and automated external defibrillator use.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in rural areas had lower odds of ROSC at hospital compared to metropolitan areas, despite adjustment for known prognostic covariates. Despite WA's highly sparse regional population, these differences in ROSC are consistent with those reported in other international studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.13184\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.13184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:西澳大利亚州(WA)地广人稀,给紧急医疗服务(EMS)的提供带来了挑战,尤其是对于院外心脏骤停(OHCA)等时间紧迫的紧急情况:评估乡村地区对西澳大利亚州院外心脏骤停流行病学、发病率和存活率的影响:我们对 2015 年至 2022 年期间西澳大利亚州由急救服务提供的 OHCA 进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究计算了所有 OHCA 的发病率,但对生存结果进行多变量回归分析的研究队列包括尝试过 EMS 复苏的内科病因 OHCA。根据《澳大利亚标准地理分类--偏远地区》将偏远地区分为四类:结果:每 10 万人口中急救中心接诊的 OHCA 年龄标准化发病率随着偏远程度的增加而增加:大城市=104.9,内地区=123.3,外地区=138.0,偏远地区=103.9。与大城市相比,内区域(aOR = 0.71,95%CI 0.53-0.95)、外区域(aOR = 0.62,95%CI 0.45-0.86)和偏远地区(aOR = 0.52,95%CI 0.35-0.77)的住院自发性循环恢复(ROSC)调整后几率较低,但在 30 天存活率方面没有显著的统计学差异。与大城市相比,地区和偏远地区的响应时间更长,送往医院的时间更短,旁观者心肺复苏术和自动体外除颤器的使用率更高:尽管对已知的预后协变量进行了调整,但与大都市地区相比,农村地区的院外心脏骤停患者在医院的ROSC几率较低。尽管西澳大利亚的地区人口非常稀少,但这些ROSC差异与其他国际研究报告的结果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The reality of rurality: Understanding the impact of remoteness on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Western Australia - A retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Western Australia (WA) spans a large, sparsely-populated area of Australia, presenting a challenge for the provision of Emergency Medical Service (EMS), particularly for time-critical emergencies such as out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Objective: To assess the impact of rurality on the epidemiology, incidence and survival of OHCA in WA.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of EMS-attended OHCA in WA from 2015 to 2022. Incidence was calculated on all OHCAs, but the study cohort for the multivariable regression analysis of rurality on survival outcomes consisted of OHCAs of medical aetiology with EMS resuscitation attempted. Rurality was categorised into four categories, derived from the Australian Standard Geographic Classification - Remoteness Areas.

Results: The age-standardised incidence of EMS-attended OHCA per 100 000 population increased with increasing remoteness: Major Cities = 104.9, Inner Regional = 123.3, Outer Regional = 138.0 and Remote = 103.9. Compared to Major Cities, the adjusted odds for return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at hospital were lower in Inner Regional (aOR = 0.71, 95%CI 0.53-0.95), Outer Regional (aOR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.45-0.86) and Remote areas (aOR = 0.52, 95%CI 0.35-0.77) but there was no statistically significant difference for 30-day survival. Relative to Major Cities, Regional and Remote areas had longer response times, shorter transport-to-hospital times, and higher rates of bystander CPR and automated external defibrillator use.

Conclusions: Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in rural areas had lower odds of ROSC at hospital compared to metropolitan areas, despite adjustment for known prognostic covariates. Despite WA's highly sparse regional population, these differences in ROSC are consistent with those reported in other international studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
期刊最新文献
Does distance to hospital and interhospital transfer negatively impact time to definitive fixation and outcomes in patients with fractured neck of femur in a rural setting? Who stays? Australian alcohol and other drug work and worker characteristics predicting regional, rural and remote job retention. 'They got my back': Thematic analysis of relationship building in nurse home visiting in Aboriginal communities. Imaging personnel are key to improved imaging service delivery in rural areas. The 7Cs to reduce dental hesitancy for culturally and linguistically diverse rural Australians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1