儿童腹腔镜复杂阑尾切除术后引流的使用:单中心经验。

IF 1 Q3 PEDIATRICS Minerva Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-09-19 DOI:10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07483-4
Valerio Voglino, Simone Frediani, Ivan P Aloi, Valerio Pardi, Arianna Bertocchini, Antonella Accinni, Alessandro Inserra
{"title":"儿童腹腔镜复杂阑尾切除术后引流的使用:单中心经验。","authors":"Valerio Voglino, Simone Frediani, Ivan P Aloi, Valerio Pardi, Arianna Bertocchini, Antonella Accinni, Alessandro Inserra","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07483-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients undergoing appendectomy, postoperative complications are more likely to occur with complicated appendicitis. Abdominal drainage may occasionally be used to prevent such scenarios. It is unclear, though, how abdominal drains help to reduce problems after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis at a tertiary center between October 2021 and September 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Following appendectomy, patients with and without peritoneal drains were contrasted in terms of preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven of 83 patients (44.58%) undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis received abdominal drainage. The drain group had longer hospital stay (9 days [IQR 6-11] vs. 6 days [IQR 4-8], P=0.0002) and longer time to CRP normalization (6 days [IQR 4-9.5] vs. 8 days [7-12], P=0.0222) compared to the no-drain group. The drain group also had a higher complication rate (30.56% vs. 23.81%, P=0.6107), although such finding was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of abdominal drains after laparoscopic appendectomy did not significantly prevent postoperative complications in complicated appendicitis. Instead, it was associated with longer hospitalization, although patients in the drain group are likely to have experienced more severe conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56337,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of drainage after laparoscopic complicated appendectomy in children: a single-center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Valerio Voglino, Simone Frediani, Ivan P Aloi, Valerio Pardi, Arianna Bertocchini, Antonella Accinni, Alessandro Inserra\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07483-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients undergoing appendectomy, postoperative complications are more likely to occur with complicated appendicitis. Abdominal drainage may occasionally be used to prevent such scenarios. It is unclear, though, how abdominal drains help to reduce problems after surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis at a tertiary center between October 2021 and September 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Following appendectomy, patients with and without peritoneal drains were contrasted in terms of preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven of 83 patients (44.58%) undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis received abdominal drainage. The drain group had longer hospital stay (9 days [IQR 6-11] vs. 6 days [IQR 4-8], P=0.0002) and longer time to CRP normalization (6 days [IQR 4-9.5] vs. 8 days [7-12], P=0.0222) compared to the no-drain group. The drain group also had a higher complication rate (30.56% vs. 23.81%, P=0.6107), although such finding was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of abdominal drains after laparoscopic appendectomy did not significantly prevent postoperative complications in complicated appendicitis. Instead, it was associated with longer hospitalization, although patients in the drain group are likely to have experienced more severe conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva Pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva Pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07483-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07483-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在接受阑尾切除术的患者中,复杂性阑尾炎更容易出现术后并发症。腹腔引流偶尔可用于预防此类情况。但目前还不清楚腹腔引流是如何帮助减少术后问题的:方法:对 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 9 月期间在一家三级医院接受复杂性阑尾炎阑尾切除术的小儿患者进行回顾性研究。在阑尾切除术后,对有腹腔引流管和没有腹腔引流管的患者进行术前特征和术后结果对比:83名因复杂性阑尾炎接受急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者中有37名(44.58%)接受了腹腔引流术。与未引流组相比,引流组住院时间更长(9 天 [IQR 6-11] 对 6 天 [IQR 4-8],P=0.0002),CRP 恢复正常时间更长(6 天 [IQR 4-9.5] 对 8 天 [7-12],P=0.0222)。引流管组的并发症发生率也更高(30.56% vs. 23.81%,P=0.6107),但这一结果没有统计学意义:结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术后使用腹腔引流管并不能显著预防复杂性阑尾炎的术后并发症。结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术后使用腹腔引流管并不能明显预防复杂性阑尾炎的术后并发症,反而会延长住院时间,尽管引流管组患者的病情可能更严重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Use of drainage after laparoscopic complicated appendectomy in children: a single-center experience.

Background: In patients undergoing appendectomy, postoperative complications are more likely to occur with complicated appendicitis. Abdominal drainage may occasionally be used to prevent such scenarios. It is unclear, though, how abdominal drains help to reduce problems after surgery.

Methods: Pediatric patients who underwent appendectomy for complicated appendicitis at a tertiary center between October 2021 and September 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Following appendectomy, patients with and without peritoneal drains were contrasted in terms of preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes.

Results: Thirty-seven of 83 patients (44.58%) undergoing emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis received abdominal drainage. The drain group had longer hospital stay (9 days [IQR 6-11] vs. 6 days [IQR 4-8], P=0.0002) and longer time to CRP normalization (6 days [IQR 4-9.5] vs. 8 days [7-12], P=0.0222) compared to the no-drain group. The drain group also had a higher complication rate (30.56% vs. 23.81%, P=0.6107), although such finding was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: The use of abdominal drains after laparoscopic appendectomy did not significantly prevent postoperative complications in complicated appendicitis. Instead, it was associated with longer hospitalization, although patients in the drain group are likely to have experienced more severe conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
294
期刊最新文献
An intranasal multicomponent medical device (Saflovir®) may represent a valuable option in managing upper airways diseases. Management of nocturnal enuresis in children. The role of combining anti-reflux and anti-drooling surgery in neurologically impaired children with chronic lung aspiration. Studying inborn errors of immunity to understand the pathogenic mechanisms underlying highly prevalent immune-mediated diseases. Timing for reconstructive surgery in Hirschsprung disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1