乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白给药方式对肝移植术后患者治疗体验的影响:在线调查结果。

Giorgia Rizza, Kyriaki Glynou, Masha Eletskaya
{"title":"乙型肝炎免疫球蛋白给药方式对肝移植术后患者治疗体验的影响:在线调查结果。","authors":"Giorgia Rizza, Kyriaki Glynou, Masha Eletskaya","doi":"10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.90949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in combination with a potent nucleos(t)ide analog is considered the standard of care for prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation for HBV-associated disease.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate patients' satisfaction, preferences, and requirements for subcutaneous (SC), intramuscular (IM), and intravenous (IV) HBIG treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-completion, cross-sectional, online, 22-question survey was conducted to examine perceptions and satisfaction with current HBIG treatment in adults receiving HBIG treatment following liver transplantation for HBV-associated disease in France, Italy, and Turkey. Hypothetical HBIG products with different administration modes were evaluated using target product profile assessment and a conjoint (trade-off) exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients were enrolled; 32%, 17%, and 51% were SC, IM, and IV HBIG users, respectively. Mean duration of treatment was 36.2 months. SC HBIG had the least negative impact on emotional well-being and social life and was perceived as the most convenient, easiest to administer, least painful, and had the highest self-rating of treatment compliance. More IM HBIG users than SC or IV HBIG users reported that administration frequency was excessive (67%, 28%, and 28%, respectively). In the target product profile assessment, 76% of patients were likely to use hypothetical SC HBIG. In the conjoint exercise, administration route, frequency, and duration were key drivers of treatment preferences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ease, frequency, duration, and side effects of HBIG treatment administration were key drivers of treatment preferences, and SC HBIG appeared advantageous over IM and IV HBIG for administration ease, convenience, and pain. A hypothetical SC HBIG product elicited a favorable response. Patient demographics, personal preferences, and satisfaction with HBIG treatment modalities may influence long-term treatment compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":65557,"journal":{"name":"世界移植杂志","volume":"14 3","pages":"90949"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317858/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of hepatitis B immunoglobulin mode of administration on treatment experiences of patients after liver transplantation: Results from an online survey.\",\"authors\":\"Giorgia Rizza, Kyriaki Glynou, Masha Eletskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.90949\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in combination with a potent nucleos(t)ide analog is considered the standard of care for prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation for HBV-associated disease.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate patients' satisfaction, preferences, and requirements for subcutaneous (SC), intramuscular (IM), and intravenous (IV) HBIG treatments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A self-completion, cross-sectional, online, 22-question survey was conducted to examine perceptions and satisfaction with current HBIG treatment in adults receiving HBIG treatment following liver transplantation for HBV-associated disease in France, Italy, and Turkey. Hypothetical HBIG products with different administration modes were evaluated using target product profile assessment and a conjoint (trade-off) exercise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety patients were enrolled; 32%, 17%, and 51% were SC, IM, and IV HBIG users, respectively. Mean duration of treatment was 36.2 months. SC HBIG had the least negative impact on emotional well-being and social life and was perceived as the most convenient, easiest to administer, least painful, and had the highest self-rating of treatment compliance. More IM HBIG users than SC or IV HBIG users reported that administration frequency was excessive (67%, 28%, and 28%, respectively). In the target product profile assessment, 76% of patients were likely to use hypothetical SC HBIG. In the conjoint exercise, administration route, frequency, and duration were key drivers of treatment preferences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Ease, frequency, duration, and side effects of HBIG treatment administration were key drivers of treatment preferences, and SC HBIG appeared advantageous over IM and IV HBIG for administration ease, convenience, and pain. A hypothetical SC HBIG product elicited a favorable response. Patient demographics, personal preferences, and satisfaction with HBIG treatment modalities may influence long-term treatment compliance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":65557,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"世界移植杂志\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"90949\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11317858/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"世界移植杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.90949\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界移植杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5500/wjt.v14.i3.90949","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目的:评估患者对皮下注射(SC)、肌肉注射(IM)和静脉注射(IV)HBIG治疗的满意度、偏好和要求:方法:在法国、意大利和土耳其进行了一项自我填写、横断面、在线、22 个问题的调查,以了解因 HBV 相关疾病接受肝移植后接受 HBIG 治疗的成人对当前 HBIG 治疗的看法和满意度。采用目标产品特征评估和联合(权衡)练习对不同给药模式的假设 HBIG 产品进行了评估:结果:90 名患者参与了研究,其中 32%、17% 和 51% 分别使用了 SC、IM 和 IV HBIG。平均治疗时间为 36.2 个月。皮下注射 HBIG 对情绪健康和社交生活的负面影响最小,被认为是最方便、最容易操作、痛苦最小的方法,治疗依从性的自我评价也最高。与经皮或静脉注射 HBIG 用户相比,更多的 IM HBIG 用户表示给药频率过高(分别为 67%、28% 和 28%)。在目标产品特征评估中,76% 的患者可能会使用假定的 SC HBIG。在联合练习中,给药途径、频率和持续时间是治疗偏好的主要驱动因素:结论:HBIG 治疗给药的难易程度、频率、持续时间和副作用是影响治疗偏好的关键因素,与 IM 和 IV HBIG 相比,SC HBIG 在给药难易程度、便利性和疼痛方面更具优势。一种假定的皮下注射 HBIG 产品引起了良好反响。患者的人口统计学特征、个人偏好以及对 HBIG 治疗方式的满意度可能会影响长期治疗的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of hepatitis B immunoglobulin mode of administration on treatment experiences of patients after liver transplantation: Results from an online survey.

Background: Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in combination with a potent nucleos(t)ide analog is considered the standard of care for prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation for HBV-associated disease.

Aim: To evaluate patients' satisfaction, preferences, and requirements for subcutaneous (SC), intramuscular (IM), and intravenous (IV) HBIG treatments.

Methods: A self-completion, cross-sectional, online, 22-question survey was conducted to examine perceptions and satisfaction with current HBIG treatment in adults receiving HBIG treatment following liver transplantation for HBV-associated disease in France, Italy, and Turkey. Hypothetical HBIG products with different administration modes were evaluated using target product profile assessment and a conjoint (trade-off) exercise.

Results: Ninety patients were enrolled; 32%, 17%, and 51% were SC, IM, and IV HBIG users, respectively. Mean duration of treatment was 36.2 months. SC HBIG had the least negative impact on emotional well-being and social life and was perceived as the most convenient, easiest to administer, least painful, and had the highest self-rating of treatment compliance. More IM HBIG users than SC or IV HBIG users reported that administration frequency was excessive (67%, 28%, and 28%, respectively). In the target product profile assessment, 76% of patients were likely to use hypothetical SC HBIG. In the conjoint exercise, administration route, frequency, and duration were key drivers of treatment preferences.

Conclusion: Ease, frequency, duration, and side effects of HBIG treatment administration were key drivers of treatment preferences, and SC HBIG appeared advantageous over IM and IV HBIG for administration ease, convenience, and pain. A hypothetical SC HBIG product elicited a favorable response. Patient demographics, personal preferences, and satisfaction with HBIG treatment modalities may influence long-term treatment compliance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
293
期刊最新文献
Tuberculosis in kidney transplant candidates and recipients. Challenges related to clinical decision-making in hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence post-liver transplantation: Is there a hope? Disorders of potassium homeostasis after kidney transplantation. Donor hepatectomy time and liver transplantation outcomes: An opportunity that cannot be dismissed. Evolution of heart transplant donor characteristics in the 21st century: A United States single center's experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1